椎管内镇痛分娩的发展回顾与研究进展
Review and Research Progress of Neuraxial Labor Analgesia
摘要: 提高自然分娩率、减少非社会因素剖宫产一直是产科医护工作者的工作重心之一。而椎管内镇痛分娩是目前公认的镇痛效果确切的药物性镇痛分娩方法。本文就椎管内镇痛分娩的发展回顾与研究进展进行总结，探讨其安全性、有效性，及其在我国的发展前景。
Abstract: Improving the rate of natural delivery and reducing cesarean section due to non-social factors has always been one of the priorities of obstetricians and nurses. And neuraxial labor analgesia is recognized and effective method at present. This article reviews the development and research progress of neuraxial labor analgesia, and discusses its safety, effectiveness and development prospect in China.
文章引用：马瑞芝, 任永变, 马金梅. 椎管内镇痛分娩的发展回顾与研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(2): 1239-1243. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2022.122180

参考文献

[1] 徐春晓, 康程, 熊添. 缩宫素联合连续硬膜外阻滞麻醉对无痛分娩产妇应激反应及疼痛程度的影响[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2018, 46(8): 975-977.
[2] Tabatabaeichehr, M. and Mortazavi, H. (2020) The Effectiveness of Aromatherapy in the Management of Labor Pain and Anxiety: A Systematic Review. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 30, 449-458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Amiri, P., Mirghafourvand, M., Esmaeilpour, K., Kamalifard, M. and Ivanbagha, R. (2019) The Effect of Distraction Techniques on Pain and Stress during Labor: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19, Article No. 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Koyyalamudi, V., Sidhu, G., Cornett, E.M., Nguyen, V., Labrie-Brown, C., Fox, C.J. and Kaye, A.D. (2016) New Labor Pain Treatment Options. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 20, Article No. 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 李冰, 陈绪军, 郭艳, 赵占强, 朱芸, 李佳芹, 王熙乔. 不同浓度罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼在硬膜外阶梯式分娩镇痛中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2016, 32(4): 361-365.
[6] 王占晖, 刘玉梅, 刘雪. 利多卡因复合盐酸罗哌卡因与枸橼酸舒芬太尼对产妇自控硬膜外分娩镇痛效果及对泌乳功能的影响[J]. 河北医学, 2020, 26(1): 23-27.
[7] Bos, E., Hollmann, M.W. and Lirk, P. (2017) Safety and Efficacy of Epidural Analgesia. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 30, 736-742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] 徐铭军, 姚尚龙. 中国分娩镇痛现状分析与实施策略[J]. 中国医刊, 2016, 51(8): 4-7.
[9] Anim-Somuah, M., Smyth, R.M., Cyna, A.M. and Cuthbert, A. (2018) Epidural versus Non-Epidural or No Analgesia for Pain Management in Labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, D331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Buddeberg, B.S., Bandschapp, O. and Girard, T. (2019) Post-Dural Puncture Headache. Minerva Anestesiologica, 85, 543-553.
[11] 张艳菊, 于志强, 王建波. 接受硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇产时发热原因及其对母婴影响的研究进展[J]. 山东医药, 2019, 59(27): 110-114.
[12] 李细平, 王海燕, 袁向华, 贺涛. 无痛分娩对产程及母婴结局的影响分析[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2018, 9(1): 123-125.
[13] 孙岳琴, 郭益萍. 无痛分娩对初产妇的分娩效果、视觉模拟疼痛评分及应激反应的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2019, 34(20): 4630-4632.
[14] Wilson, S.H., Wolf, B.J., Bingham, K., Scotland, Q.S., Fox, J.M., Woltz, E.M. and Hebbar, L. (2018) Labor Analgesia Onset with Dural Puncture Epidural versus Traditional Epidural Using a 26-Gauge Whitacre Needle and 0.125% Bupivacaine Bolus: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126, 545-551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Chau, A., Bibbo, C., Huang, C.C., Elterman, K.G., Cappiello, E.C., Robinson, J.N. and Tsen, L.C. (2017) Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality with Fewer Side Effects Compared with Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 124, 560-569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] 陈培伟, 等. 程控脉冲式注射与连续输注用于硬膜外分娩镇痛效果的比较[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2020, 26(14): 2041-2045.
[17] 刘小溪, 柳韦华, 许圣菊, 李成瑶. 程控硬膜外间歇脉冲注入技术(PIEB)对分娩结局及新生儿apgar评分影响的meta分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2018, 45(20): 3813-3818.
[18] 姚腊梅, 李元海, 朱海娟, 汪胜友, 方向东. 硬膜外程控间歇脉冲式分娩镇痛对母婴安全的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2019, 35(9): 889-892.
[19] Roofthooft, E., Barbé, A., Schildermans, J., Cromheecke, S., Devroe, S., Fieuws, S., Rex, S., Wong, C.A. and Van de Velde, M. (2020) Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus vs. Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Maintenance of Labour Analgesia: A Two-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomised Study. Anaesthesia, 75, 1635-1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Traynor, J.D., Dooley, S.L., Seyb, S., Wong, C.A. and Shadron, A. (2000) Is the Management of Epidural Analgesia Associated with an Increased Risk of Cesarean Delivery? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 182, 1058-1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Anonymous (2019) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 209 Summary: Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133, 595-597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] 段宝敏, 洪凡真, 徐永萍, 辛刚, 孙文娟, 陈丽宇, 肖娟, 刘娣. 实施硬膜外分娩镇痛时机对初产妇妊娠结局的影响[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2021, 30(7): 528-531.
[23] 宋佳, 王冬雪, 王冰冰, 申健. 不同时机实施分娩镇痛对初产妇产程和分娩方式及新生儿结局的影响[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2020, 55(7): 476-479.
[24] Cahill, A.G., Srinivas, S.K., Tita, A., Caughey, A.B., Richter, H.E., Gregory, W.T., Liu, J., Woolfolk, C., Weinstein, D.L., Mathur, A.M., Macones, G.A. and Tuuli, M.G. (2018) Effect of Immediate vs Delayed Pushing on Rates of Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery among Nulliparous Women Receiving Neuraxial Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 320, 1444-1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] 欧候敏, 蔡换萍, 林美琼, 林沈娴. 第二产程不同时机运用腹压对分娩镇痛初产妇分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华保健医学杂志, 2021, 23(5): 502-504.
[26] 姚维银, 范荣, 黄欢. 分娩镇痛初产妇第二产程运用腹压的时机分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(13): 45-48.
[27] Butwick, A.J., Bentley, J., Wong, C.A., Snowden, J.M., Sun, E. and Guo, N. (2018) United States State-Level Variation in the Use of Neuraxial Analgesia during Labor for Pregnant Women. JAMA Network Open, 1, e186567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] 徐铭军, 姚尚龙. 中国分娩镇痛现状与对策[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2018, 39(4): 289-293.

为你推荐