考虑气候内部变率影响的偏差校正评价框架及其应用
A Framework to Consider Internal Climate Variability for Bias Correction Methods and Its Application
DOI: 10.12677/JWRR.2022.111005, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 惠 宇, 李书飞:长江设计集团有限公司,湖北 武汉;徐雨妮:长江水利委员会水文局,湖北 武汉;彭培艺:重庆交通大学西南水运工程科学研究所,重庆
关键词: 气候内部变率非一致性全球气候模式偏差校正方法Internal Climate Variability Nonstationarity Global Climate Model Bias Correction Method
摘要: 气候内部变率可能引起全球气候模式输出变量(如降雨和气温)偏差非一致性,进而会影响偏差校正方法的结果。因此,本文建立了考虑气候内部变率影响的偏差校正评价框架,采用残留偏差指标定量评价了偏差校正方法在历史和未来时段的偏差校正结果。同时,分别通过4个GCM多成员集合估算了气候内部变率,进而分析气候内部变率模拟值的不确定性对偏差校正评价结果的影响。结果表明,在历史时段,偏差校正方法能够有效地降低GCM输出变量的偏差,使得残留偏差在气候内部变率范围内。在未来时段,偏差校正方法仅仅在一定程度上降低了GCM输出变量的偏差。虽然气候内部变率具有明显的不确定性,但残留偏差依然可能大于气候内部变率。
Abstract: Bias nonstationarity of outputs (precipitation and temperature) of GCMs attributed by internal climate variability could influence the performance of bias correction methods. This study established a framework to consider internal climate variability for bias correction methods. The remaining bias index was introduced to evaluate the performance of tradition bias correction method over historical and future periods. Furthermore, the impacts of uncertainty of internal climate sensitivity estimated by 4 GCMs multi-member ensembles are explored in evaluating the performance of bias correction. The results show that the bias correction method can reduce the bias of raw GCM simulations in the historical period, indicated by the remaining bias which is within internal climate variability. However, the bias correction method can only reduce the bias of raw GCM simulations to some extent in the future period. The remaining bias can be outside the range of internal climate variability, even though the uncertainty of internal climate variability is large.
文章引用:惠宇, 徐雨妮, 李书飞, 彭培艺. 考虑气候内部变率影响的偏差校正评价框架及其应用[J]. 水资源研究, 2022, 11(1): 50-60. https://doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2022.111005

参考文献

[1] 陈杰, 许崇育, 郭生练, 等. 统计降尺度方法的研究进展与挑战[J]. 水资源研究, 2016, 5(4): 299-313. CHEN Jie, XU Chongyu, GUO Shenglian, et al. Progress and challenge in statistically downscaling climate model outputs. Journal of Water Resources Research, 2016, 5(4): 299-313. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] CHEN, J., BRISSETTE, F. P. and LECONTE, R. Uncertainty of downscaling method in quantifying the impact of climate change on hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, 2011, 401(3-4): 190-202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] TEUTSCHBEIN, C., SEIBERT, J. Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, 456: 12-29.[CrossRef
[4] TEUTSCHBEIN, C., SEIBERT, J. Is bias correction of regional climate model (RCM) simulations possible for non-stationary conditions? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 17(12): 5061-5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] CHEN, J., BRISSETTE, F. P. and LUCAS-PICHER, P. Assessing the limits of bias-correcting climate model outputs for climate change impact studies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2015, 120(3): 1123-1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] HUI, Y., CHEN, J., XU, C. Y., et al. Bias nonstationarity of global climate model outputs: The role of internal climate variability and climate model sensitivity. International Journal of Climatology, 2019, 39(4): 2278-2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] HUI, Y., XU, Y. N., CHEN, J., et al. Impacts of bias nonstationarity of climate model outputs on hydrological simulations. Hydrology Research, 2020, 51(5): 925-941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] CHEN, J., ST-DENIS, B. G., BRISSETTE, F. P., et al. Using natural variability as a baseline to evaluate the performance of bias correction methods in hydrological climate change impact studies. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2016, 17(8): 2155-2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] CHEN, J., BRISSETTE, F. P., CHAUMONT, D., et al. Performance and uncertainty evaluation of empirical downscaling methods in quantifying the climate change impacts on hydrology over two North American River basins. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 479: 200-214.[CrossRef
[10] MARAUN, D. Nonstationarities of regional climate model biases in European seasonal mean temperature and precipitation sums. Geophysical Research Letters, 2012, 39(6): L06706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef