基于多任务学习的注意力机制双向GRU用于在线手写签名认证
Bidirectional GRU with Attention Mechanism Based on Multi-Task Learning for Online Handwritten Signature Verification
摘要: 深度学习的进步极大地提高了在线签名认证(online signature verification, OSV)系统的性能,但是如何从有限的签名样本中学习具有判别性的签名特征仍然是该领域所面临的挑战。为了缓解这个问题,本研究提出了一种基于多任务学习的注意力机制双向门循环单元(MT-A-BiGRU)模型来实现在线签名的认证。首先,通过基于注意力机制的双向门循环单元(A-BiGRU)模型来实现序列特征的有监督表征学习,并引入深度度量学习任务来充分挖掘序列特征的潜在表示。在此基础上,将稀疏自动编码器压缩后的全局特征与A-BiGRU模型所提取的特征进行融合,以实现特征信息的互补。最后,本文提出一种基于多任务学习的训练方法,进一步提高了OSV系统的准确率。所提出的方法在SVC-2004-task2数据集中达到了2.16%的等错误率和96.88%的准确率,实验结果表明所提出的方法够有效地提高OSV系统的认证精度。
Abstract: Advances in deep learning have greatly improved the performance of online signature verification (OSV) systems, but how to learn discriminative signature features from limited signature samples remains a challenge in this field. To alleviate this problem, this study proposes a multitask learning-attention mechanism-bidirectional gate recurrent unit (MT-A-BiGRU) model to achieve online signature verification. Firstly, the supervised representation learning of sequence features is realized through an attention mechanism-bidirectional gate recurrent unit (A-BiGRU) model, and a deep metric learning task is introduced to fully mine the latent representations of sequence features. On this basis, the global features compressed by sparse auto encoder are fused with the features extracted by the A-BiGRU model to achieve the complementarity of feature information. Finally, this study proposes a training method based on multi-task learning, which further improves the accuracy of the OSV system. The proposed method achieves an equal error rate of 2.16% and an accuracy of 96.88% in the SVC-2004-task2 dataset. The experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively improve the verification accuracy of the OSV system.
文章引用:沈奇, 栾方军, 袁帅. 基于多任务学习的注意力机制双向GRU用于在线手写签名认证[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2022, 12(2): 473-485. https://doi.org/10.12677/CSA.2022.122048

参考文献

[1] Ahrabian, K. and Baba Ali, B. (2019) Usage of Autoencoders and Siamese Networks for Online Handwritten Signature Verification. Neural Computing and Applications, 31, 9321-9334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Fierrez-Aguilar, J., Nanni, L., Lopez-Penalba, J., et al. (2005) An On-Line Signature Verification System Based on Fusion of Local and Global Information. In: International Conference on Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, Springer, Berlin, 523-532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Kholmatov, A. and Yanikoglu, B. (2005) Identity Authentication Using Improved Online Signature Verification Method. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26, 2400-2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Van, B.L., Garcia-Salicetti, S. and Dorizzi, B. (2007) On Using the Viterbi Path along with HMM Likelihood Information for Online Signature Verification. IEEE Transactions on Sys-tems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 37, 1237-1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Sharma, A. and Sundaram, S. (2016) An Enhanced Contextual DTW Based System for Online Signature Verification Using Vector Quantization. Pattern Recognition Letters, 84, 22-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Lai, S., Jin, L. and Yang, W. (2017) Online Signature Verification Using Recurrent Neural Network and Length-Normalized Path Signature Descriptor. 2017 14th IAPR International Con-ference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Vol. 1, 400-405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 陆鑫益. 在线签名认证算法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2020: 6-7.
[8] Vorugunti, C.S., Pulabaigari, V., Gorthi, R.K.S.S., et al. (2020) OSVFuseNet: Online Signature Verification by Feature Fusion and Depth-Wise Separable Convolution Based Deep Learning. Neurocomputing, 409, 157-172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Yeung, D.Y., Chang, H., Xiong, Y., et al. (2004) SVC2004: First International Signature Verification Competition. In: International Conference on Biometric Authentication, Springer, Berlin, 16-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Vorugunti, C.S., Mukherjee, P. and Pulabaigari, V. (2019) Osvnet: Convolutional Siamese Network for Writer Independent Online Signature Verification. 2019 International Con-ference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Sydney, 20-25 September 2019, 1470-1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Bengio, Y., Simard, P.Y. and Frasconi, P. (1994) Learning Long-Term Dependencies with Gradient Descent Is Difficult. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5, 157-166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Cho, K., Van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., et al. (2014) Learning Phrase Representations Using RNN Encoder—Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. In: Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, ACL, Doha, 1724-1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Olshausen, B.A. and Field, D.J. (1996) Emergence of Simple-Cell Receptive Field Properties by Learning a Sparse Code for Natural Images. Nature, 381, 607-609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D. and Philbin, J. (2015) Facenet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, 7-12 June 2015, 815-823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Sharma, A. and Sundaram, S. (2017) On the Exploration of In-formation from the DTW Cost Matrix for Online Signature Verification. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 48, 611-624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Impedovo, D. and Pirlo, G. (2018) Automatic Signature Verifi-cation in the Mobile Cloud Scenario: Survey and Way Ahead. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 1, 41-54.
[17] He, L., Tan, H. and Huang, Z.C. (2019) Online Handwritten Signature Verification Based on Association of Curvature and Torsion Feature with Hausdorff Distance. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78, 19253-19278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef