主、客观社会经济地位对自尊的影响：感觉加工敏感性的调节作用
The Effect of Subjective and Objective Socioeconomic Status on Self-Esteem: The Moderating Role of Sensory Processing Sensitivity
摘要: 目的：探讨客观社会经济地位和主观社会地位对自尊的影响，以及感觉加工敏感性在其中的调节作用。方法：采用客观社会经济地位问卷、主观社会地位问卷、Rosenberg总体自尊量表以及高度敏感人格量表对248名大学生进行调查。结果：1) 客观社会经济地位和主观社会地位对自尊均具有正向预测作用；2) 相比于客观社会经济地位，主观社会地位对自尊的预测作用更大；3) 感觉加工敏感性的“易于激发性”维度在客观社会经济地位与自尊之间起调节作用。结论：个体的敏感性特质与客观社会经济地位之间存在交互作用，这一结果支持了素质–压力模型。
Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to explore the effects of objective socioeconomic status and subjective social status on self-esteem and the moderating role of sensory processing sensitivity. Methods: 248 college students completed the questionnaire of objective socioeconomic status, the questionnaire of subjective social status, Rosenberg self-esteem scale, and sensory processing sensitivity. Results: 1) Objective socioeconomic status and subjective social status positively predicted self-esteem; 2) Subjective social status had a stronger predictive effect on self-esteem; 3) The ease of excitation dimension of sensory processing sensitivity played a moderating role in the relation between objective socioeconomic status and self-esteem. Conclusion: There is an interaction between an individual’s sensitivity traits and objective socioeconomic status, which supported the diathesis-stress model.
文章引用：蒋佳伶, 周欣念 (2022). 主、客观社会经济地位对自尊的影响：感觉加工敏感性的调节作用. 心理学进展, 12(2), 552-566. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.122063

参考文献

[1] 程刚, 陈艳红, 关雨生, 等(2015). 大学生主观社会地位的指标构成及特点. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), (6), 156-162.
[2] 侯倩倩(2019). 父母的受教育程度对子女教育期望的影响. 硕士学位论文, 长沙: 湖南大学.
[3] 林崇德, 杨治良, 黄希庭(主编) (2003). 心理学大辞典(p. 600). 上海教育出版社.
[4] 曲可佳, 邹泓(2013). 家庭社会经济地位、父母教养行为与大学生职业生涯探索的关系. 心理发展与教育, (5), 500-506.
[5] 严标宾, 郑雪(2006). 大学生社会支持、自尊和主观幸福感的关系研究. 心理发展与教育, 3(3), 60-64.
[6] 占盛丽(2009). 从个人和学校视角看家庭社会经济地位对学生学业成绩的影响——国际学生评估项目(PISA)的启示. 上海教育科研, (12), 10-13.
[7] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942.
[8] Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-Processing Sensitivity and Its Relation to Introversion and Emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 345-368.[CrossRef] 
[9] Belsky, J. (1997). Theory Testing, Effect-Size Evaluation, and Differential Susceptibility to Rearing Influence: The Case of Mothering and Attachment. Child Development, 68, 598-600.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond Diathesis Stress: Differential Susceptibility to Environmental Influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885-908.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Booth, C., Standage, H., & Fox, E. (2015). Sensory-Processing Sensitivity Moderates the Association between Childhood Experiences and Adult Life Satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 24-29.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Chen, E., & Paterson, L. Q. (2006). Neighborhood, Family, and Subjective Socioeconomic Status: How Do They Relate to Adolescent Health? Health Psychology, 25, 704-714.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., & Martin, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic Status, Family Processes, and Individual Development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 685-704.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Cundiff, J. M., & Matthews, K. A. (2017). Is Subjective Social Status a Unique Correlate of Physical Health? A Meta-Analysis. Health Psychology, 36, 1109-1125.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Friedkin, N. E. (2011). A Formal Theory of Reflected Appraisals in the Evolution of Power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 501-529.[CrossRef] 
[16] Greven, C. U., Lionetti, F., Booth, C. et al. (2019). Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the Context of Environmental Sensitivity: A Critical Review and Development of Research Agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287-305.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Herman, K. C., Bi, Y., Borden, L. A. et al. (2012). Latent Classes of Psychiatric Symptoms among Chinese Children Living in Poverty. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21, 391-402.[CrossRef] 
[18] Hoebel, J., & Lampert, T. (2020). Subjective Social Status and Health: Multidisciplinary Explanations and Methodological Challenges. Journal of Health Psychology, 25, 173-185.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Jonassaint, C. R., Ashley-Koch, A., Whitfield, K. E. et al. (2012). The Serotonin Transporter Gene Polymorphism (5HTTLPR) Moderates the Effect of Adolescent Environmental Conditions on Self-Esteem in Young Adulthood: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Biological Psychology, 91, 111-119.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Keith, V., & Thompson, M. (2019). Subjective Social Status, Resiliency Resources, and Self-Concept among Employed African Americans. Issues in Race and Society: An Interdisciplinary Global Journal, No. 8, 29-56.
[21] Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2009). Signs of Socioeconomic Status: A Thin-Slicing Approach. Psychological Science, 20, 99-106.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Malka, A., & Miller, D. T. (2010). Political-Economic Values and the Relationship between Socioeconomic Status and Self-Esteem. Journal of Personality, 75, 25-42.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2013). Vantage Sensitivity: Individual Differences in Response to Positive Experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 901-916.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F. et al. (2018). Environmental Sensitivity in Children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and Identification of Sensitivity Groups. Developmental Psychology, 54, 51-70.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Rahal, D., Huynh, V., Cole, S. et al. (2020). Subjective Social Status and Health during High School and Young Adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 56, 1220-1232.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Roisman, G. I., Newman, D. A., Fraley, R. C. et al. (2012). Distinguishing Differential Susceptibility from Diathesis-Stress: Recommendations for Evaluating Interaction Effects. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 389-409.[CrossRef] 
[27] Rosenberg, M., & Pearlin, L. I. (1978). Social Class and Self-Esteem among Children and Adults. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 53-77.[CrossRef] 
[28] Smolewska, K. A., McCabe, S. B., & Woody, E. Z. (2006). A Psychometric Evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The Components of Sensory-Processing Sensitivity and Their Relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five”. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1269-1279.[CrossRef] 
[29] Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2002). Self-Esteem and Socioeconomic Status: A Meta-Analytic Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 59-71.[CrossRef] 
[30] von Soest, T., Wagner, J., Hansen, T. et al. (2018). Self-Esteem across the Second Half of Life: The Role of Socioeconomic Status, Physical Health, Social Relationships, and Personality Factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 945-958.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2007). The Problems of Relative Deprivation: Why Some Societies Do Better than Others. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 1965-1978.[CrossRef] [PubMed]