共同内群体认同：群体心理融合的机制
Common Ingroup Identity: The Mechanism of Group Psychological Compatibility
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.122065, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 梁芳美：河池学院教师教育学院，广西 河池
关键词: 共同内群体认同；心理融合；子群体认同；作用机制；Common Ingroup Identity； Psychological Compatibility； Subgroup Identity； Mechanism of Action
摘要: 本文基于社会认同理论和共同内群体认同模型，考察子群体认同、共同内群体认同与群体心理融合之间的关系。研究以342名大学生为被试，采用子群体认同、共同内群体认同和群体心理融合问卷进行调查，使用PROCESS进行中介效应分析。结果发现：控制人口学变量后，共同内群体认同对群体心理融合有直接作用，它是子群体认同增强群体心理融合的中介变量。研究完善了共同群体认同模型，也为积极群际关系的建立和“共同体”建构提供了实证依据。
Abstract: Based on social identity theory and the common ingroup identity model, the relationship between subgroup identity, common ingroup identity and psychological compatibility was explored. In this study, 342 college students were recruited and their subgroup identity, common ingroup identity, and psychological compatibility were measured using questionnaires, and the analysis of the mediating effects was conducted using PROCESS. The results found that common ingroup identity had a direct effect on psychological compatibility after controlling the demographic variables, and it was a mediating variable of subgroup identity for psychological compatibility of groups. The study refines the common ingroup identity model and also provides an empirical basis for the establishment of positive inter-group relationships and the construction of “community”.
文章引用：梁芳美 (2022). 共同内群体认同：群体心理融合的机制. 心理学进展, 12(2), 574-581. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.122065

参考文献

[1] 付宗国(2005). 群际冲突的社会心理实质、原因与对策探析. 山东社会科学, (4), 42-45。
[2] 管健, 荣杨(2020). 共同内群体认同: 建构包摄水平更高的上位认同. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 57(1), 39-49.
[3] 梁芳美, 肖子伦, 包燕, 赵玉芳(2020). 共同内群体认同对心理融合的促进效应及其机制. 心理科学, 43(5), 1147-1153.
[4] 秦向荣(2005). 中国11至20岁青少年的民族认同及其发展. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=2005090139.nh&DbName=CMFD2005
[5] 孙涛, 梁芳美, 赵玉芳(2020). 共同内群体认同对群体帮助的提升作用及其机制. 中国社会心理学评论, (2), 16-33.
[6] 严璞(2017). 高中生共同内群体身份激活对和解的影响——宽恕/道歉预期和共情的作用. 硕士学位论文, 宁波: 宁波大学. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=1017871649.nh&DbName=CMFD2018
[7] 赵守良, 赵玉芳, 雷丹, 刘新丰(2009). 大学生社会评价的内隐与外显测量及其相互关系. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 31(10), 160-164.
[8] 赵玉芳, 包燕, 肖子伦, 李骐, N. Willie, 梁芳美(2020). 文化混搭对群体心理融合的影响: 经验开放性的调节作用. 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版), 43(4), 50-58.
[9] 赵玉芳, 梁芳美(2019). 共同内群体认同促进民族心理融合: 双向度测量与SC-IAT检验. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 56(3), 99-107.
[10] 周天爽(2017). 共同内群体认同下城市儿童群际帮助意愿的影响路径. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 华东师范大学. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=1017074564.nh&DbName=CMFD2018
[11] Baysu, G., Coşkan, C., & Duman, Y. (2018). Can Identification as Muslim Increase Support for Reconciliation? The Case of the Kurdish Conflict in Turkey. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 64, 43-53.[CrossRef] 
[12] Beaton, A. M., Monger, T., Leblanc, D., Bourque, J., Levi, Y., Joseph, D. J. et al. (2012). Crossing the Divide: The Common In-Group Identity Model and Intergroup Affinity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 365-376.[CrossRef] 
[13] Capozza, D., Vezzali, L., Trifiletti, E., Falvo, R., & Favara, I. (2010). Improving Intergroup Relationships within and outside the Contact Situation: The Role of Common Ingroup Identity and Emotions of Empathy and Anxiety. Special Issue, 17, 17-36.
[14] Crisp, R. J., Stone, C. H., & Hall, N. R. (2006). Recategorization and Subgroup Identification: Predicting and Preventing Threats from Common Ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 230-243.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Eller, A., & Abrams, D. (2004). Come Together: Longitudinal Comparisons of Pettigrew’s Reformulated Intergroup Contact Model and the Common Ingroup Identity Model in An-glo-French and Mexican-American Contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 229-256.[CrossRef] 
[16] Eller, A., Abrams, D., & Koschate, M. (2017). Can Stateways Change Folkways? Longitudinal Tests of the Interactive Effects of Intergroup Contact and Categorization on Prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 21-31.[CrossRef] 
[17] Fritzlen, K. A., Phillips, J. E., March, D. S., Grzanka, P. R., & Olson, M. A. (2020). I Know (What) You Are, but What Am I? The Effect of Recategorization Threat and Perceived Immutability on Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 94-108.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2012). Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Routledge.[CrossRef] 
[19] Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the Contact Hypothesis: The Induction of a Common Ingroup Identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 271-290.[CrossRef] 
[20] Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 1-26.[CrossRef] 
[21] Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Benefits of Recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.[CrossRef] 
[22] Gaunt, R. (2009). Superordinate Categorization as a Moderator of Mutual Infrahumanization. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 731-746.[CrossRef] 
[23] Guan, Y., Verkuyten, M., Fung, H. H., Bond, M. H., Chen, S. X. et al. (2011). Out-Group Value Incongruence and Intergroup Attitude: The Roles of Common Identity and Multiculturalism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 377-385.[CrossRef] 
[24] Halloran, M., & Chambers, G. (2011). The Effects of a Common In-Group Prime on Intentions to Help Indigenous and Homeless Australians. Australian Psychologist, 46, 163-170.[CrossRef] 
[25] Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup Relations: A Comparison of Mutual Intergroup Differentiation and Common Ingroup Identity Models of Prejudice Reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242-256.[CrossRef] 
[26] Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2001). Is There Any Scapegoat Around? Determinants of Intergroup Conflicts at Different Categorization Levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1090-1102.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Lemay, E. P., & Ryan, J. E. (2021). Common Ingroup Identity, Perceived Similarity, and Communal Interracial Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47, 985-1003.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Otten, S., & Wentura, D. (1999). About the Impact of Automaticity in the Minimal Group Paradigm: Evidence from Affective Priming Tasks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1049-1071.[CrossRef] 
[29] Peña, J., Wolff, G., & Wojcieszak, M. (2021). Virtual Reality and Political Outgroup Contact: Can Avatar Customization and Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Social Distance? Social Media + Society, 7.[CrossRef] 
[30] Prati, F., Crisp, R. J., Meleady, R., & Rubini, M. (2016). Humanizing Outgroups Through Multiple Categorization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 526-539.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., Gaertner, S. L., McDonald, S. A., & Lamoreaux, M. J. (2010). Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Intergroup Threat? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 403-423.[CrossRef] 
[32] Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Noor, M. (2013). Overcoming Competitive Victimhood and Facilitating Forgiveness through Re-Categorization into a Common Victim or Perpetrator Identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 867-877.[CrossRef] 
[33] Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102.
[34] Toprakkiran, S., & Gordils, J. (2021). The Onset of COVID-19, Common Identity, and Intergroup Prejudice. The Journal of Social Psychology, 161, 435-451.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M., & Weber, U. (2003). Towards Tolerance: Representations of Superordinate Categories and Perceived Ingroup Prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 31-47.[CrossRef]