“全面三孩”政策下，主观社会经济地位与生育意愿：生命史策略的中介作用
Subjective Socioeconomic Status and Fertility Willingness under the “Universal Three-Child” Policy: The Mediating Role of Life History Strategies
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.122066, PDF,   
作者: 郭明琴：广西师范大学教育学部心理系，广西 桂林
关键词: 主观社会经济地位；生育意愿；生命史策略；Socioeconomic Status； Fertility Willingness； Life History Strategies
摘要: 生育赤字、人口老龄化已经成为21世纪全世界面临的难题，如何提高国民生育意愿，缓解潜在的人口问题和其他社会问题已成当务之急。本研究采用问卷法，对生命史策略在主观社会经济地位与生育意愿的中介作用进行考察。结果显示：1) 主观社会经济地位对生育意愿有负向影响。2) 生命史策略对主观社会经济地位与生育意愿的关系的间接效应显著。
Abstract: Birth deficit and population aging have become problems faced by the world in the 21st century. How to improve the willingness of citizens to have children, alleviate potential population prob-lems and other social problems has become a top priority. This study used a questionnaire me-thod to investigate the mediating role of life history strategies between subjective socioeco-nomic status and fertility willingness. The results show that: 1) Subjective socioeconomic status has a negative impact on fertility willingness. 2) The indirect effect of life history strategies on the relationship between subjective socioeconomic status and fertility willingness was signifi-cant.
文章引用：郭明琴 (2022). “全面三孩”政策下，主观社会经济地位与生育意愿：生命史策略的中介作用. 心理学进展, 12(2), 582-588. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.122066

参考文献

[1] 陈建新, 王莉君(2021). 个人因素对不同阶段生育意愿的影响——基于CGSS2017数据的实证分析. 调研世界, (6), 58-64.
[2] 陈卫(2019). 中国的两孩政策与生育率. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 56(5), 57-68.
[3] 方长春, 陈友华(2016). 生育率的阶层差异将形塑M型社会. 探索与争鸣, (1), 59-63.
[4] 洪岩璧, 华杰(2020). 健康行为代际传递模式的社会经济地位差异——基于CHNS2015的实证研究. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 34(6), 39-48.
[5] 林镇超, 王燕(2015). 生命史理论: 进化视角下的生命发展观. 心理科学进展, (4), 721-728.
[6] 刘金菊, 陈卫(2019). 中国的生育率低在何处? 人口与经济, (6), 70-81.
[7] 茅倬彦, 罗昊(2013). 符合二胎政策妇女的生育意愿和生育行为差异——基于计划行为理论的实证研究. 人口研究, 37(1), 84-93.
[8] 人民网(2021-06-22). 实施三孩政策 完善配套措施. http://cq.people.com.cn/n2/2021/0622/c365405-34786992.html
[9] 汤兆云, 郭真真(2012). 经济水平对生育意愿的影响分析——一项经验研究: 基于621份调查问卷的数据. 人口与发展, 18(3), 29-35+88.
[10] 王记文(2018). 很低生育率背景下中国的生育意愿及其影响因素研究——基于CGSS (2010~2015)重复调查数据的分析. 西北人口, 39(4), 73-80+88.
[11] 王燕, 林镇超, 侯博文, 孙时进(2017). 生命史权衡的内在机制: 动机控制策略的中介作用. 心理学报, 49(6), 783-793.
[12] 王煜, 李梦菊(2020). 建设性还是破坏性? 羞愧的双路径模型. 心理科学进展, 28(8), 1325-1336.
[13] 吴帆(2016). 欧洲家庭政策与生育率变化——兼论中国低生育率陷阱的风险. 社会学研究, 31(1), 49-72+243.
[14] 吴帆(2019). 低生育率陷阱究竟是否存在?——对后生育率转变国家(地区)生育率长期变化趋势的观察. 人口研究, 43(4), 50-60.
[15] 吴帆(2020). 生育意愿研究: 理论与实证. 社会学研究, 35(4), 218-240.
[16] 邢采, 孟彧琦, 林青青, 秦子玉(2019). 生育年龄限制感提高女性的计划生育数量. 心理学报, 51(4), 428-436.
[17] 郑真真(2014). 生育意愿的测量与应用. 中国人口科学, (6), 15-25+126.
[18] 中央政治局(2021-5-31). 听取“十四五”时期积极应对人口老龄化重大政策举措汇报, 审议《关于优化生育政策促进人口长期均衡发展的决定》.
[19] 周国红, 何雨璐, 杨均中(2021). “生育主力”缘何有名无实?——基于743份城市青年生育意愿的问卷调查分析. 浙江社会科学, (5), 77-86+157-158.
[20] Baizan, P. (2021). Welfare Regime Patterns in the Social Class-Fertility Relationship: Second Births in Austria, France, Norway, and the United Kingdom. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 73, Article ID: 100611.[CrossRef] 
[21] Becker, G. S. (1960). An Economic Analysis of Fertility. In Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries (pp. 209-240). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[22] Belsky, J. (2010). Childhood Experience and the Development of Reproductive Strategies. Psicothema, 22, 28-34.
[23] Berent, J. (1952). Fertility and Social Mobility. Population Studies, 5, 244-260.[CrossRef] 
[24] Boberg-Fazlic, N., Sharp, P., & Weisdorf, J. (2011). Survival of the Richest? Social Status, Fertility and Social Mobility in England 1541-1824. European Review of Economic History, 15, 365-392.[CrossRef] 
[25] Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theory of Fertility Decline. London & New York Academic, 85, 1210-1211.
[26] Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. L. (2009). Fundamental Dimensions of Environmental Risk. Human Nature, 20, 204-268.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Figueredo, A. J., Wolf, P. S. A., Olderbak, S. G., Gladden, P. R., Fernandes, H. B. F., Wenner, C. et al. (2014). The Psychometric Assessment of Human Life History Strategy: A Meta-Analytic Construct Validation. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8, 148-185.[CrossRef] 
[28] Flanders, N. A., Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Vol. 2089). Addison-Wesley.
[29] Griskevicius, V., Ackerman, J. M., Cantú, S. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., Simpson, J. A. et al. (2013). When the Economy Falters, Do People Spend or Save? Responses to Resource Scarcity Depend on Childhood Environments. Psychological Science, 24, 197-205.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Griskevicius, V., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & Tybur, J. M. (2011a). Environmental Contingency in Life History Strategies: The Influence of Mortality and Socioeconomic Status on Reproductive Timing. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 100, 241-254.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2011b). The Influence of Mortality and Socioeconomic Status on Risk and Delayed Rewards: A Life History Theory Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1015-1026.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Kaplan, H. S., & Gangestad, S. W. (2005). Life History Theory and Evolutionary Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[33] Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., & Keltner, D. (2010). Social Class, Contextualism, and Empathic Accuracy. Psychological Science, 21, 1716-1723.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Singh-Manoux, A., Adler, N. E., & Marmot, M. G. (2003). Subjective Social Status: Its Determinants and Its Association with Measures of Ill-Health in the Whitehall II Study. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1321-1333.[CrossRef] 
[35] Torres, A. (2020). Analysis of Latin American Fertility in Terms of Probable Social Classes. MPIDR Working Papers.
[36] Whelpton, C. V. K. K. (1949). Social and Psychological Factors Affecting Fertility. IX. Fertility Planning and Fertility Rates by Socio-Economic Status. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 27, 188-244.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Zhang, G. (2004). Does the Family Planning Program Affect Fertility Preferences? The Case of China. In 12th Biennial Conference: Population and Society: Issue, Research, Policy. Australian Population Association.