复发转移性宫颈癌药物治疗的新进展
New Progress in Drug Treatment of Recurrent and Metastatic Cervical Cancer
DOI: 10.12677/MD.2022.121001, PDF,   
作者: 孟 宇, 王淑珍:首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院,妇产科,北京
关键词: 抗血管生成免疫治疗宫颈癌复发转移Anti-Angiogenesis Immunotherapy Cervical Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis
摘要: 血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)已经成为包括宫颈癌在内的多种恶性肿瘤的治疗靶点。化疗联合完全人源化单克隆抗体——贝伐珠单抗,现已成为复发转移性宫颈癌患者的治疗选择。III期随机试验GOG 240结果显示化疗联合贝伐单抗,可以明显提高总生存期及无进展生存期(PFS17.0 vs. 13.3个月),不增加不良反应。GOG 240研究结果显示贝伐单抗的治疗效果与患者不良预后因素及循环肿瘤细胞有关,存在高中危预后不良因素者对贝伐单抗治疗反应良好。循环肿瘤细胞量与贝伐单抗治疗效果相关,可以作为贝伐单抗治疗效果评估的生物标记物。不可否认阴道瘘是与贝伐单抗使用相关的不良事件。复发性转移性宫颈癌药物治疗的另一个飞跃是免疫治疗,以免疫检查点为靶点,免疫检查点抑制剂通过PD-1/PD-L1通路来打破免疫耐受,对部分晚期宫颈癌有效,但仍需要大量临床数据对其治疗选择、适应症、禁忌症进行评价。抗血管生成及免疫检查点抑制剂为复发转移性宫颈癌患者带来一缕曙光,但其并发症值得关注。广泛临床应用还需要积累更多的临床数据。
Abstract: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has become a therapeutic target for several malignancies, including cervical cancer. Chemotherapy combined with a fully humanized monoclonal anti-body—bevacizumab, has become the treatment of choice for patients with recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer. The regulatory approval for this indication was based on the Phase III randomized trial GOG 240, which showed statistically and clinically significant improvement in overall survival after the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy: 17.0 vs. 13.3 months. The addition of bevacizumab significantly improved progression-free survival without affecting quality of life. GOG 240 confirmed that the treatment effect of bevacizumab was related to poor prognostic factors, and those with medium to high risk prognosis responded well to bevacizumab treatment. Circulating tumor cells can be used as biomarkers to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab therapy. Vaginal fistula is an adverse event associated with bevacizumab. Immunotherapy has entered clinical trials to address the clinical need for effective and tolerated second-line treatment in this patient population. Targeted by immune checkpoints, immune checkpoint inhibitors break immune tolerance through the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, and are effective against some advanced cervical cancer, but a large number of clinical data are needed to evaluate treatment options, indications, and contraindications. Anti-angiogenesis and immune checkpoint inhibitors bring dawn to patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, but their complications deserve attention. Extensive clinical applications need more clinical data.
文章引用:孟宇, 王淑珍. 复发转移性宫颈癌药物治疗的新进展[J]. 医学诊断, 2022, 12(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.12677/MD.2022.121001

参考文献

[1] Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D. and Jemal, A. (2018) Cancer Statistics, 2018. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68, 7-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Folkman, J. (1971) Tumor Angiogenesis: Therapeutic Implications. New England Journal of Medicine, 285, 1182-1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Monk, B.J., Sill, M.W., Burger, R.A., et al. (2009) Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 1069-1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Monk, B.J., Mas, L.L., Zarba, J.J., et al. (2010) Phase II, Open-Label Study of Pazopanib or Lapatinib Monotherapy Compared with Pazopanib Plus Lapatinib Combination Therapy in Patients with Advanced and Recurrent Cervical Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28, 3562-3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Tewari, K.S., Sill, M.W., Penson, R.T., et al. (2017) Bevacizumab for Advanced Cervical Cancer: Final Overall Survival and Adverse Event Analysis of a Randomised, Controlled, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240). Lancet, 390, 1654-1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Tewari, K.S., Sill, M.W., Long, H.R., et al. (2014) Improved Survival with Bevacizumab in Advanced Cervical Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 370, 734-743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Moore, D.H., Tian, C., Monk, B.J., et al. (2010) Prognostic Factors for Response to Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Cervical Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecologic Oncology, 116, 44-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Penson, R.T., Huang, H.Q., Wenzel, L.B., et al. (2015) Bevacizumab for Advanced Cervical Cancer: Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Randomised, Phase 3 Trial (NRG Oncology-Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol 240). Lancet Oncology, 16, 301-311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Pim, D., Collins, M. and Banks, L. (1992) Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E5 Gene Stimulates the Transforming Activity of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. Oncogene, 7, 27-32.
[10] Mezache, L., Paniccia, B., Nyinawabera, A., et al. (2015) Enhanced Expression of PD L1 in Cervical In-traepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancers. Modern Pathology, 28, 1594-1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Feng, Y.C., Ji, W.L., Yue, N., Huang, Y.C. and Ma, X.M. (2018) The Relationship between the PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway and DNA Mismatch Repair in Cervical Cancer and Its Clin-ical Significance. Cancer Management and Research, 10, 105-113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Reddy, O.L., Shintaku, P.I. and Moatamed, N.A. (2017) Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Is Expressed in a Significant Number of the Uterine Cervical Carcinomas. Diagnostic Pathology, 12, Article No. 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Naumann, R.W., Hollebecque, A., Meyer, T., et al. (2019) Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Monotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical, Vaginal, or Vulvar Carcinoma: Results from the Phase I/II CheckMate 358 Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 37, 2825-2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Frenel, J.S., Le Tourneau, C., O’Neil, B., et al. (2017) Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Advanced, Programmed Death Ligand 1-Positive Cervical Cancer: Results from the Phase Ib KEYNOTE-028 Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35, 4035-4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Chung, H.C., Ros, W., Delord, J.P., et al. (2019) Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in Previously Treated Advanced Cervical Cancer: Results from the Phase II KEYNOTE-158 Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 37, 1470-1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Peng, Z., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., et al. (2016) EBP50 Interacts with EGFR and Regulates EGFR Signaling to Affect the Prognosis of Cervical Cancer Patients. International Journal of Oncology, 49, 1737-1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Qin, Y., Ekmekcioglu, S., Forget, M.A., Szekvolgyi, L., Hwu, P., Grimm, E.A., et al. (2017) Cervical Cancer Neoantigen Landscape and Immune Activity Is Associated with Human Pap-illomavirus Master Regulators. Frontiers in Immunology, 8, Article No. 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Yang, W., Lu, Y.P., Yang, Y.Z., Kang, J.-R., Jin, Y.-D. and Wang, H.-W. (2017) Expressions of Programmed Death (PD)-1 and PD-1 Ligand (PD-L1) in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinomas Are of Prognostic Value and Associated With Human Papillomavirus Status. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 43, 1602-1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Heeren, A.M., Punt, S., Bleeker, M.C., et al. (2016) Prognostic Effect of Different PD-L1 Expression Patterns in Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix. Modern Pathology, 29, 753-763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Curie, I. (2017) Nivolumab in Association with Radiotherapy and Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancers Followed by Adjuvant Nivolumab for up to 6 Months. NCT03298893.
[21] NCI (National Cancer Institute) (2018) Atezolizumab before and/or with Chemoradiotherapy in Immune System Activation in Patients with Node Positive Stage IB2, II, IIIB, or IVA Cervical Cancer. NCT03738228.
[22] Trust RMNF (2017) A Study of Pembrolizumab And Platinum with Radiotherapy in Cervix Cancer. NCT03144466.