胡杨雌雄株冠层光合速率日变化差异及主要影响因子
The Diurnal Variation of Photosynthetic Rate in Male and Female Canopy of Populus euphratica Oliv. and Its Main Influencing Factors
DOI: 10.12677/BR.2022.112016, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 张晋龙, 翟军团, 李 秀, 李志军*:塔里木盆地生物资源保护利用兵团重点实验室,新疆 阿拉尔;塔里木大学生命科学与技术学院,新疆 阿拉尔;塔里木大学胡杨研究中心,新疆 阿拉尔;李小东:塔里木大学生命科学与技术学院,新疆 阿拉尔
关键词: 胡杨光合日变化冠层雌雄Populus euphratica Oliv. Diurnal Variation of Photosynthesis Canopy Male and Female
摘要: 以胡杨为试材,使用Li-6400便携式光合作用仪,测定了不同冠层高度下胡杨雌雄株光合参数的日变化,应用相关分析、回归分析,研究净光合速率与生理、环境因子间的关系,为植物生长调控提供理论依据。结果表明:① 胡杨雌雄株、蒸腾速率Tr与气孔限制值Ls的变化趋势均为单峰曲线,胞间二氧化碳浓度Ci日变化呈现“V”字型,水分利用效率WUE呈现上下波动趋势,胡杨雌雄株气孔导度Gs因不同冠层而表现出“单峰”型和“双峰”型两种趋势,净光合速率Pn日变化与Gs同步,峰值均出现在11:30,而Tr峰值滞后Pn、Gs2h。② 胡杨雌雄株的Pn、Gs、Ci、Tr均随着冠层的升高而增加,WUE、Ls均随着冠层的升高而减少,在11:30和15:30,胡杨雌雄冠层2 m与10 m的Gs、WUE、Tr、Ls有显著差异。③ 胡杨雌雄株对各生理因子和环境因子的响应有所不同,胡杨雌株叶片的光合作用受生理因子和生态因子的影响比雄株更显著。④ 对胡杨雌株Pn的促进作用最大的是光合有效辐射PAR,对胡杨雄株Pn的促进作用最大的是空气温度Tair;对胡杨雌雄株Tr促进作用最大的均是Tair;对胡杨雌株Ci的抑制作用最大的是PAR,对胡杨雄株Ci的抑制作用最大的是Tair;对胡杨雌株Gs的促进作用最大的是Tair,3个环境因子均对胡杨雄株Gs无显著影响。PAR是影响胡杨雌株叶片净光合速率最主要的环境因子;Tair是影响胡杨雄株叶片净光合速率最主要的环境因子。
Abstract: Taking Populus euphratica Oliv. as the test material, the Li-6400 portable photosynthesis instrument was used to measure the diurnal changes of photosynthetic parameters of male and female Populus euphratica plants under different canopy heights. Correlation analysis and regression analysis were used to study the relationship between net photosynthetic rate and physiological and environmental factors. In order to provide theoretical basis for plant growth regulation, the results showed that: ① The change trends of Pn, Tr and Ls of male and female plants of Populus euphratica were all unimodal curves, the daily variation of Ci showed a “V” shape, and WUE showed a trend of up and down fluctuations. Gs showed two trends of “single-peak” and “double-peak” due to different canopy heights. The diurnal variation of Pn was synchronized with Gs, and both peaks appear at 11:30, while the peak of Tr lags behind Pn and Gs for 2 h. ② Pn, Gs, Ci, and Tr of male and female Populus euphratica all increased with the increase of the canopy heights, while WUE and Ls decreased with the increase of the canopy heights. At 11:30 and 15:30, there were significant differences in Gs, WUE, Tr and Ls between male and female canopies of 2 m and 10 m in Populus euphratica. ③ The responses of male and female plants of Populus euphratica to various physiological and environmental factors were different. The photosynthesis of leaves of female Populus euphratica plants was more significantly affected by physiological and environmental factors than that of male plants. ④ PAR was the most promoting effect on Pn in female Populus euphratica, and Tair was the most promoting effect on Pn in male Populus euphratica; Tair was the most promoting effect on Tr in both male and female plants; PAR was the most inhibitory effect on Ci of female Populus euphratica, and Tair was the most inhibitory effect on Ci of male Populus euphratica; Tair has the greatest promoting effect on Gs in female Populus euphratica. All three environmental factors have no significant effect on Gs in male Populus euphratica. PAR was the most important environmental factor affecting the net photosynthetic rate of female leaves of Populus euphratica; Tair was the most important environmental factor affecting the net photosynthetic rate of male leaves of Populus euphratica.
文章引用:张晋龙, 李小东, 翟军团, 李秀, 李志军. 胡杨雌雄株冠层光合速率日变化差异及主要影响因子[J]. 植物学研究, 2022, 11(2): 115-128. https://doi.org/10.12677/BR.2022.112016

参考文献

[1] 马雅莉, 郭素娟. 板栗冠层光合特性的空间异质性研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(10): 71-83.
[2] Sakowska, K., Alberti, G., Genesio, L., et al. (2018) Leaf and Canopy Photosynthesis of a Chlorophyll Deficient Soybean Mutant. Plant Cell and Environment, 41, 1427-1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] O’Rourke, P.A. and Terjung, W.H. (1981) Relative Influence of City Structure on Canopy Photosynthesis. International Journal of Biometeorology, 25, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Suwa, R. and Hagihara, A. (2007) Seasonal Changes in Canopy Photosynthesis and Foliage Respiration in a Rhizophora stylosa Stand at the Northern Limit of Its Natural Distribution. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 16, 313-321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Kurachi, N., Hagihara, A. and Hozumi, K. (1993) Canopy Photosynthetic Production in a Japanese Larch Forest (II): Estimation of the Canopy Photo Synthetic Production. Ecological Research, 8, 349-361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 夏国威, 陈东升, 孙晓梅, 张守攻. 日本落叶松冠层光合生理参数的空间异质性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(6): 130-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 夏国威, 孙晓梅, 陈东升, 张守攻. 日本落叶松冠层光合特性的空间变化[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 13-21.
[8] 殷工, 徐立, 买买提依明, 夏庆友, 吴丽莉, 米日古丽, 印玉萍, 闫海龙, 曾凡江. 新疆沙漠桑树光合特性日变化的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008(8): 257-261.
[9] 刘强, 董利虎, 李凤日, 李想. 长白落叶松冠层光合作用的空间异质性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9): 2789-2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 黄良帅, 韩海荣, 牛树奎, 程小琴, 周文嵩. 华北落叶松冠层光合生理特性的空间异质性[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(2): 193-197.
[11] Jarvis, P.G., James, G.B. and Landsberg, J.J. (1976) Coniferous Forest. Vegetation and the Atmosphere, 2, 171-240.
[12] Han, Q.M. (2011) Height-Related Decreases in Mesophyll Conductance, Leaf Photosynthesis and Compensating Adjustments Associated with Leaf Nitrogen Concentrations in Pinus densiflora. Tree Physiology, 31, 976-984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 罗青红, 李志军, 伍维模, 韩路. 胡杨、灰叶胡杨光合及叶绿素荧光特性的比较研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(5): 983-988.
[14] 马文涛, 武胜利. 不同林龄胡杨净光合速率对生态因子和生理因子的响应[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 1004-1013.
[15] 于军, 王海珍, 周正立, 李志军, 韩路. 塔里木荒漠优势树种气体交换特性与环境因子的关系研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2008, 28(10): 2110-2117.
[16] 代雅琦, 刘艳萍, 韩路, 王海珍. 地下水埋深对胡杨叶片光合作用及抗氧化物质积累的影响[J/OL]. 植物研究, 2022(2): 299-308. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1480.S.20210922.0803.002.html, 2022-02-09.
[17] 周洪华, 陈亚宁, 李卫红, 陈亚鹏. 塔里木河下游胡杨气体交换特性及其环境解释[J]. 中国沙漠, 2008, 28(4): 665-672.
[18] 常宗强, 冯起, 苏永红, 吴雨霞, 司建华, 席海洋. 额济纳绿洲胡杨的光合特征及其对光强和CO2浓度的响应[J]. 干旱区地理, 2006, 29(4): 496-502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 李雪娇, 李伟, 高冠龙. 极端干旱区胡杨净光合速率日变化及主要影响因子[J/OL]. 山西大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 44(6): 1241-1249. 2022-01-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Zhai, J.T., Li, Y.L., Han, Z.J., et al. (2020) Morphological, Structural and Physiological Differences in Heteromorphic Leaves of Euphrates Poplar during Development Stages and at Crown Scales. Plant Biology, 22, 366-375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] 李志军, 焦培培, 郑亚琼, 等. 胡杨和灰杨繁殖生物学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.
[22] 邵玺文, 韩梅, 韩忠明, 孔伟伟, 杨利民. 不同生境条件下黄芩光合日变化与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3): 1470-1477.
[23] 靳甜甜, 傅伯杰, 刘国华, 胡婵娟, 苏常红, 刘宇. 不同坡位沙棘光合日变化及其主要环境因子[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(7): 1783-1793.
[24] 金则新, 柯世省. 云锦杜鹃叶片光合作用日变化特征[J]. 植物研究, 2004, 24(4): 447-452.
[25] 庞发虎, 杨建伟, 庞振凌, 杜瑞卿. 杨树生理生态指标与环境因子之间相关性分析[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(12): 3188-3197.
[26] 刘玉华, 史纪安, 贾志宽, 韩清芳. 旱作条件下紫花苜蓿光合蒸腾日变化与环境因子的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(10): 1811-1814.
[27] 潘瑞炽, 董愚得. 植物生理学(第三版) [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001.
[28] Schulze, E.D., Fuchs, M. and Fuchs, M.I. (1977) Spatial Distribution of Photosynthetic Capacity and Performance in a Mountain Spruce Forest of Northern Germany. Oecologia, 30, 239-248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Kull, O. (2002) Acclimation of Photosynthesis in Canopies: Models and Limitations. Oecologia, 133, 267-279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] 赵宏瑾, 朱仲元, 王喜喜, 宋小园, 王辉, 焦玮. 不同生育期榆树净光合速率对生态因子和生理因子的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(6): 1645-1651.
[31] 刘遵春, 包东娥. “金光杏梅”叶片净光合速率与生理生态因子的关系[J]. 西北植物学报, 2008, 28(3): 564-568.
[32] 吴桂林, 蒋少伟, 周天河, 王丹丹, 李君. 不同地下水埋深胡杨与柽柳幼苗的水分利用策略比较[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(6): 1209-1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef