高中生未来取向与学习投入的关系：应对方式和学业浮力的中介作用
The Relationship between High School Students’ Future Orientation and Study Engagement: The Mediating Role of Coping Style and Academic Buoyancy
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.123071, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 童可儿, 赵必华：安徽师范大学教育科学学院，安徽 芜湖
关键词: 高中生；未来取向；学习投入；应对方式；学业浮力；High School Students； Future Orientation； Study Engagement； Coping Style； Academic Buoyancy
摘要: 本文研究考察高中生未来取向对学习投入预测的可能途径，即探究应对方式和学业浮力在高中生未来取向与学习投入间的中介作用，并采用《青少年未来取向问卷》《学习投入量表》《中学生应对方式量表》《学业浮力量表》对516名高中生进行调查。结果显示：1) 高中生未来取向与指向问题的应对方式、学业浮力、学习投入两两之间呈显著正相关，未来取向、学业浮力、学习投入分别与指向情绪的应对方式呈显著负相关。2) 未来取向对学习投入的直接效应显著，应对方式与学业浮力在未来取向对学习投入的关系中起部分中介作用，并且应对方式与学业浮力在未来取向对学习投入的影响中起链式中介作用。
Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the possible ways for high school students’ future orientation to predict learning input, that is, to explore the mediating role of coping style and academic buoyancy be-tween high school students’ future orientation and study engagement. Method: A survey of 516 high school students was conducted using the “Adolescent Future Orientation Questionnaire”, “Learning Input Scale”, “Middle School Students’ Coping Style Scale”, and “Academic Floating Power Scale”. Results: 1) The future orientation of high school students was significantly positively correlated with the problem-oriented coping style, academic buoyancy, and study engagement. Future orientation, academic buoyancy, and study engagement were significantly negatively correlated with the emotional coping style. 2) The direct effect of future orientation on study engagement was significant. Coping style and academic buoyancy played partial mediating roles in the relationship between future orientation and study engagement. Coping style and academic buoyancy played chain mediating roles in the influence of future orientation on study engagement.
文章引用：童可儿, 赵必华 (2022). 高中生未来取向与学习投入的关系：应对方式和学业浮力的中介作用. 心理学进展, 12(3), 618-624. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.123071

参考文献

[1] 陈树林, 郑全全, 潘健男, 郑胜圣(2000). 中学生应对方式量表的初步编制. 中国临床心理学杂志, 8(4), 211-214+237.
[2] 方来坛, 时勘, 张风华(2008). 中文版学习投入量表的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(6), 618-620.
[3] 富辰, 刘文理(2020). 大专生未来取向和学习投入的关系: 专业适应性的中介作用. 宁波教育学院学报, 22(6), 24-29.
[4] 郭建鹏, 计国君(2019). 大学生学习体验与学习结果的关系: 学生投入的中介作用. 心理科学, 42(4), 868-875.
[5] 郭秀琴(2016). 大学生学业倦怠的影响因素及干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 太原: 山西医科大学.
[6] 韩琴, 张晨怡(2020). 大学生学业自我效能感对生活满意度的影响: 日常性学业弹性的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 28(2), 270-273.
[7] 贾绪计, 李雅倩, 蔡林, 王庆瑾, 林琳(2020). 自我妨碍与学习投入的关系: 学业浮力的中介作用和父母支持的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 18(2), 227-233.
[8] 李抗, 杨文登(2015). 从归因疗法到内隐理念: 德韦克的心理学理论体系及影响. 心理科学进展, 23(4), 621-631.
[9] 刘霞, 黄希庭, 毕翠华(2011). 青少年未来取向问卷的编制. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 37(6), 7-12+201.
[10] 谢晓东, 喻承甫, 李丁丁(2016). 珠三角地区青少年未来取向与学习倦怠的关系: 应对方式的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, (10), 1468-1472.
[11] 张信勇, 卞小华, 徐光兴(2000). 高中生的学习投入及其与应激的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 16(11), 1246-1248.
[12] Chua, L. W., & Milfont, T. L., & Jose, P. E. (2015). Coping Skill Help Explain How Fu-ture-Oriented Adolescents Accrue Greater Well-Being over Time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2028-2041.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Malmberg, L. E., Hall, J., & Ginns, P. (2015). Academic Buoyancy, Student’s Achievement, and the Linking Role of Control: A Cross-Lagged Analysis of High School Students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 113-130.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If It Changes It Must Be a Process: Study of Emotion and Coping during Three Stages of a College Examination. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 48, 150-170.[CrossRef] 
[15] John, P. S., & Clive, J. F. (2009). Facilitators and Outcomes of Student Engagement in a College Setting. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 143, 5-27.[CrossRef] 
[16] Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic Buoyancy: Towards an Understanding of Students’ Everyday Academic Resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 53-83.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Martin, A. J., Colmar, S. H., Davey, L. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2010). Longitudinal Modelling of Academic Buoyancy and Motivation: Do the “5Cs” Hold Up over Time? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 473-496.[CrossRef] 
[18] Pitzer, J., & Skinner, E. (2017). Predictors of Changes in Students’ Motivational Resilience over the School Year: The Roles of Teacher Support, Self-Appraisals, and Emotional Reactivity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41, 15-29.[CrossRef] 
[19] Putwain, D. W., Connors, L., Symes, W., & Douglas-Osborn, E. (2012). Is Academic Buoyancy Anything More than Adaptive Coping? Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 25, 349-358.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.[CrossRef] 
[21] Thomas, C. L., & Allen, K. (2020). Driving Engagement: Investigating the Influence of Emotional Intelligence and Academic Buoyancy on Student Engagement. Journal of Future and Higher Education, 45, 107-119.[CrossRef] 
[22] Vizoso, C., Rodriguez, C., & Arias-Gundin, O. (2018). Coping, Academic Engagement and Performance in University Students. Higher Education Research & Development, 37, 1515-1529.[CrossRef] 
[23] Wefald, A. J., & Downey, R. G. (2009). Construct Dimensionality of Engagement and Its Relation with Satisfaction. The Journal of Psychology, 143, 91-112.[CrossRef]