昼–夜Stroop效应中执行功能的受抑制情况
Inhibition of Executive Function in Day-Night Stroop Effect
摘要: 目的:正处于执行功能发展关键期的学前儿童在完成昼–夜Stroop任务时抑制控制能力会受到抑制。本文旨在研究大学生的执行功能在昼–夜Stroop任务中的受抑制情况。方法:本研究从湖北工程学院召集了58名大学生被试,使用E-Prime编写实验程序,采用2 (刺激类型:彩色图片VS.四字词语)*2 (匹配状况:匹配VS.不匹配)的被试内设计研究被试的抑制控制能力是否会受到刺激材料的类型与匹配状况的影响。因变量为平均反应时和平均正确率。结果:重复测量的方差分析结果显示,在反应时上,刺激类型的主效应显著(p < 0.05),匹配类型主效应显著(p < 0.05),刺激类型与匹配类型的交互作用不显著(p > 0.05)。结论:执行功能的表现会收到刺激类型与匹配情况的影响,且进一步发现,与学前儿童相比,大学生被试在完成昼–夜Stroop任务时,执行功能的受抑制程度更低。该研究结果为现有的对执行功能的研究提供了实证证据。
Abstract: Objective: Preschoolers who are in the critical period of executive function development will be inhibited in their inhibitory control ability when performing the day-night Stroop task. The purpose of this study was to investigate the inhibition of executive function in the day-night Stroop task of college students. Methods: In this study, 58 college students were recruited from Hubei Institute of Engineering. E-prime was used to write the experimental program, and 2*2 within-subject design was used to study whether the inhibition and control ability of the subjects would be affected by the type of stimulus materials and the matching status, and the dependent variables were average response time and average accuracy. Results: ANOVA of repeated measures showed that the main effect of stimulus type on response time was significant (p <0.05), the main effect of matching type was significant (p <0.05), the interaction between stimulus type and matching type was not significant (p >0.05). Conclusions: The performance of executive function was affected by the type of stimulus and the matching situation, and it was further found that compared with preschool children, the executive function of college students was less inhibited when they completed the day-night Stroop task. The results of this study provide empirical evidence for existing research on executive function.
文章引用:石曼卿. 昼–夜Stroop效应中执行功能的受抑制情况[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2022, 11(3): 760-770. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2022.113108

参考文献

[1] 杜亚松, 曹阳, 江文庆. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的执行功能[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(5): 465-468, 472.
[2] 宋耀武, 白学军. 小学生有意遗忘中认知抑制能力发展的研究[J]. 心理科学, 2002, 25(2): 183-187.
[3] Malone, S.A., Pritchard, V.E., Heron-Delaney, M., Burgoyne, K., Lervåg, A. and Hulme, C. (2019) The Relationship between Numerosity Discrimination and Arithmetic Skill Reflects the Approximate Number System and Cannot Be Explained by Inhibitory Control. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 184, 220-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 徐闻. Baddeley工作记忆多成分理论模型研究发展综述[J]. 韶关学院学报, 2012, 33(7): 51-54.
[5] 刘海燕, 陈俊, 肖少北. Stroop效应的研究进展[J]. 海南师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 22(1): 100-103.
[6] 白学军, 刘湍丽, 沈德立. 部分线索效应的认知抑制过程: 情绪Stroop任务证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(2): 143-155.
[7] 郭娜娜, 吴国榕, 毕明华, 邱江. 努力控制及其神经基础[J]. 心理科学, 2018, 41(3): 546-552.
[8] Montgomery, D.E. and Koeltzow, T.E. (2010) A Review of the Day-Night Task: The Stroop Paradigm and Interference Control in Young Children. Developmental Review, 30, 308-330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 李红, 王乃弋. 论执行功能及其发展研究[J]. 心理科学, 2004(2): 426-430.
[10] 倪媛媛, 李红. 从生理机制探讨心理理论与执行功能的关系[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 35(5): 75-79.
[11] 李莉, 朱湘茹, 李永鑫. 执行功能的理论研究综述[J]. 心理研究, 2012, 5(2): 50-53.
[12] 王静梅, 张义宾, 郑晨烨, 卢英俊, 秦金亮. 3-6岁儿童执行功能子成分发展的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 1-10.
[13] 李泉, 宋亚男, 廉彬, 冯廷勇. 正念训练提升3-4岁幼儿注意力和执行功能[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(3): 324-336.
[14] 刘海燕, 陈俊, 张积家. Stroop效应研究的新进展——理论, 范式及影响因素[J]. 心理科学, 2007, 30(2): 415-418.
[15] 邹雨晨, 李燕芳, 丁颖. 早期高级认知发展与前额叶功能发育的fNIRS研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 761-768.
[16] 张丽, 辛自强. 认知复杂性与意识水平: Zelazo理论述评[J]. 心理科学, 2007(1): 120-122.
[17] 魏旻俊, 朱翔贞, 高静芳, 陈莹. 抑郁症患者执行功能障碍的神经心理学机制及其脑影像学研究进展[J]. 浙江中医药大学学报, 2014, 38(8): 1034-1036+1040.
[18] 张积家, 王悦. 熟练汉-英双语者的语码切换机制——来自短语水平的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(2): 166-178.
[19] 陈俊, 刘海燕, 张积家. Stroop效应研究的新进展——理论、范式及影响因素[J]. 心理科学, 2007(2): 415-418+390.
[20] MacLeod, C.M. (1991) Half a Century of Research on the Stroop Effect: An Integrative Review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Abramczyk, R.R., Jordan, D.E. and Hegel, M. (1983) Reverse Stroop Effect in the Performance of Schizophrenics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 99-106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Aine, C.J. and Harter, M.R. (1984) Event-Related Potentials to Stroop Stimuli: Color and Word Processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 425, 152-153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Aine, C.J. and Harter, M.R. (1984) Hemispheric Differences in Event-Related Potentials to Stroop Stimuli: Attention and Color-Word Processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 425, 154-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Daniel, N.B., Michael, E.J., Masson, et al. (2006) Cognitive Control in Children: Stroop Interference and Suppress Ion of Word Reading. Psychological Science, 17, 351-357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Adleman, N.E., Menon, V., Christine, et al. (2002) A Developmental fMRI Study of the Stroop Color-Word Task. NeuroImage, 16, 61-75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Stuart, J., Johnstone, C.B. and Pleffer, R.J. (2005) Development of Inhibitory Processing during the Go/NoGo Task: A Behavioral and Event -Related Potential Study of Children and Adults. Journal of Psychophysiology, 199, 11-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Kray, J., Eppinger, B. and Mechlinger, A. (2005) Age Differences in Attentional Control: An Event-Related Potential Approach. Psychophysiology, 42, 406-416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] 彭聃龄, 桃梅, 魏景汉, 等. 儿童Stroop效应加工阶段特点的事件相关电位研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2004, 4(2): 84-88.
[29] Ridderinkhof, K.R. and van derMolen, M.W. (2000) Attention and Selection in the Growing Child: Views Derived from Developmental Psychophysiology. Biological Psychology, 54, 55-106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Qiu, J., Luo, Y.J., Wang, Q.H., et al. (2006) Brain Mechanism of Stroop Interference Effect in Chinese Characters. Brain Research, 1072, 186-193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] 郭起浩, 洪震, 吕传真, 周燕, 陆骏超, 丁玎. Stroop色词测验在早期识别阿尔茨海默病中的作用[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2005, 4(7): 701-704.
[32] 魏勇刚, 吴睿明, 李红, 冯廷勇. 抑制性控制在幼儿执行功能与心理理论中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2005(5): 598-605.