地区因素对大学英语听力发展影响的调查研究
A Survey of the Influence of Regional Factors on the Development of College English Listening
DOI: 10.12677/AE.2022.123109, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张水云, 薛常欣, 龙凤霞:兰州大学外国语学院,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 地区因素大学英语听力教学测试内容Regional Factors College English Listening Teaching Testing Content
摘要: 本研究历时3个学期跟踪调查了西部一所“双一流”综合性大学2019级3963名本科生的三次听力成绩。结果表明:1) 听力成绩整体呈现“上升–下降”的变化趋势,第二次成绩高于第一次和第三次;2) 地区因素对听力成绩有突出影响。东部地区成绩最高,其次是中部地区、东北地区和西部地区;3) 各地区的听力成绩变化趋势不完全一致。E级东北地区成绩进步更快,D级西部地区成绩较为稳定,C级中部地区成绩起伏较为明显,B级和A级西部地区学生进步空间较大;4) 听力测试内容的地区差异显著。四个地区D级和E级学生在短对话上发挥较好,A至C级学生普遍在短对话上发挥欠佳。研究结果对英语听力教学有重要的启示作用,大学英语教学应关注学生地区差异,在班级内部合理调配学生地区比例。
Abstract: This study lasted 3 semesters to track and investigate three listening scores of 3963 undergraduates of grade 2019 in a “Double Top” comprehensive university in Western China. The results indicated that: 1) The overall listening performances show an “up-down” trend in which the second score is higher than the first and the third score; 2) Regional factors have a prominent impact on listening performance. The eastern region scores are the highest, followed by the central region, the northeast region and the western region; 3) Trends of three listening scores in different regions are not consistent. The progress of E-level in northeast region is faster, the D-level in western region is more stable, the fluctuation of C-level in central region is obvious, and B and A-level students in western region have greater space for improvement; 4) There are significant regional differences in testing content. D-level and E-level play better in short conversation, while A-level to C-level perform poorer in it. The findings have critical implications for English listening study. Regional differences in students’ scores should not be ignored in College English teaching and learning stages. Allocating regional proportion reasonably within classes is crucial too.
文章引用:张水云, 薛常欣, 龙凤霞. 地区因素对大学英语听力发展影响的调查研究[J]. 教育进展, 2022, 12(3): 667-678. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2022.123109

参考文献

[1] 李万军. 大学英语教学法发展趋势探讨[C]//李洋修, 王福安, 王宪华. 大学教学管理与教学研究. 济南: 山东大学出版社, 2005: 93-99.
[2] 李红霞. 大学英语教学研究[M]. 天津: 天津科学技术出版社, 2017: 11-13.
[3] 文秋芳. 构建“产出导向法”理论体系[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2015, 47(4): 547-558+640.
[4] Idrissova, M., Smagulova, B. and Tussupbekova, M. (2015) Improving Listening and Speaking Skills in Mixed Level Groups (on the Material of New English File). Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 276-284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Jia, C. and Hew, K.F. (2021) Toward a Set of Design Principles for Decoding Training: A Systematic Review of Studies of English as a Foreign/Second Language Listening Education. Educational Research Review, 33, 1-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Ngo, N. (2019) Understanding the Impact of Listening Strategy Instruction on Listening Strategy Use from a Socio-Cultural Perspective. System, 81, 63-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 于琴妹, 鲁吉, 王毅, 等. “研究性学习”视听说教学模式下听力教学成效实证研究[J]. 外语电化教学, 2013(6): 44-49.
[8] 石琳. 民族地区大学英语分级教学模式的现状调查及优化研究[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(2): 76-80.
[9] 杨烨. 欠发达地区大学英语听力教学现状和对策——以安庆师范学院为例[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2012, 9(3): 194-195.
[10] 徐虹. 贵州民族地区大学英语听力教学中的障碍及其对策[J]. 贵州民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008(2): 166-169.
[11] 葛宝祥, 王利民. E英语教程[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2018.
[12] 郑树棠. 新视野大学英语视听说教程[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2017.
[13] 王守仁, 文秋芳. 新一代大学英语[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2018.
[14] 施良方. 学习论[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2001.
[15] Ausubel, D.P., No-vak, J.D. and Hanesian, H. (1968) Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
[16] 韩芸. 英语听力学习中会话含义的推导——基于CET4听力短对话的研究[J]. 语文学刊(外语教育与教学), 2011(6): 107-109+128.