夫妻间房产赠与约定的性质与效力
The Nature and Effectiveness of Property Gift Agreement between Husband and Wife
摘要: 因法律条文的模糊表述与供给不足,也因强财产法的理念指引,夫妻间房产赠与纠纷尽管标的小,却普遍困扰着司法实践。该类纠纷难以解决的始点是各方对夫妻间财产约定的性质认定存在分歧,未能厘清内含于其中的身份法与财产法关系。将夫妻间赠与纳入《民法典》第1065条的广义夫妻间财产约定中,使其优先适用婚姻家庭编规则,不仅能客观上理顺条文关系,更能深入实现家庭和睦与财产保护的双重愿景。夫妻间房产赠与约定的效力内外有别,对内无需登记即可发生物权变动,对外未经登记不可对抗善意第三人。总而言之,夫妻间房产赠与纠纷的裁判要把握夫妻间赠与内含于夫妻间财产约定的底层逻辑,重视民本价值和伦理价值以平衡好夫妻内部利益,重视市场经济和交易秩序以维护好善意第三人利益。
Abstract: Because of the vague expression, insufficient supply of legal provisions and the strong guidance of the concept of property law, the property gift dispute between husband and wife generally troubled the judicial practice, although the target is small. It is difficult to solve this kind of dispute because the parties have different views on the nature of property agreement between husband and wife, and fail to clarify the relationship between identity law and property law. By including the gift between husband and wife into the broad property agreement between husband and wife in Article 1065 of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China and giving priority to the application of marriage and family constitution rules, it can not only objectively straighten out the relationship between provisions, but also deeply realize the dual vision of family harmony and property protection. The validity of the property gift agreement between husband and wife is different inside and outside. The property right can be changed without registration inside, and the third party in good faith cannot be opposed without registration outside. In a word, the judge of the dispute of property gift between husband and wife should grasp the underlying logic of the gift between husband and wife contained in the property agreement between husband and wife, pay attention to the people-oriented value and ethical value to balance the internal interests of husband and wife, pay attention to the market economy and transaction in order to maintain the interests of the third party in good faith.
文章引用:梁瑞鑫. 夫妻间房产赠与约定的性质与效力[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2022, 11(3): 963-971. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2022.113132

参考文献

[1] 李侠. 论民法典编纂中我国婚姻协议的立法规制[J]. 学术论坛, 2018, 41(2): 163-169.
[2] 薛宁兰. 与立法相伴前行: 七十年来的婚姻家庭法学研究[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 41(10): 12-28.
[3] 肖立梅. 我国《物权法》与《婚姻法》在调整婚姻家庭财产关系中的适用[J]. 法学杂志, 2014, 35(8): 70-78.
[4] 曲超彦. 夫妻间赠与的法律适用[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 38(1): 23-28.
[5] 最高人民法院民事审判第一庭. 最高人民法院民法典婚姻家庭编司法解释(一)理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2021: 301.
[6] 赵敏. 家庭财产关系法律适用的路径选择——以夫妻间赠与为分析进路[J]. 理论月刊, 2017(11): 78-86.
[7] 叶名怡. 夫妻间房产给予约定的性质与效力[J]. 法学, 2021(3): 131-149.
[8] 田韶华. 夫妻问赠与的若干法律问题[J]. 法学, 2014(2): 71-80.
[9] 曹薇薇, 黎林. 民法典时代夫妻房产赠与纠纷中的司法判决冲突及解决[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2021(2): 108-117.
[10] 裴桦. 也谈夫妻间赠与的法律适用[J]. 当代法学, 2016, 30(4): 92-102.
[11] 冉克平. 夫妻之间给予不动产约定的效力及其救济——兼析《婚姻法司法解释(三)》第6条[J]. 法学, 2017(11): 154-167.
[12] 许莉. 夫妻房产约定的法律适用——基于我国约定夫妻财产制的考察[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2015(1): 55-63.
[13] 申晨. 《民法典》视野下婚内协议的效力认定[J]. 法学评论, 2021, 39(6): 181-193.
[14] 罗师, 颜凌云. 夫妻约定不动产“归一方所有”的性质、效力与物权变动——对《民法典》第1065条的解释论展开[J]. 山东女子学院学报, 2021(5): 77-85.
[15] 龙俊. 物权变动模式的理想方案与现实选择[J]. 法学杂志, 2019, 40(7): 21-30.
[16] 王轶, 关淑芳. 物权债权区分论的五个理论维度[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2014, 54(5): 5-13.
[17] 贺剑. 夫妻财产法的精神——民法典夫妻共同债务和财产规则释论[J]. 法学, 2020(7): 20-40.
[18] 李贵连, 刘陈皓. 民法物权变动理论的历史经验及当代启示[J]. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 47(4): 118-126+169.
[19] 申晨. 民法典婚姻家庭编的回归与革新[J]. 比较法研究, 2020(5): 109-121.
[20] 赵玉. 司法视域下夫妻财产制的价值转向[J]. 中国法学, 2016(1): 210-227.