语法化和去语法化的动态关系分析
Analysis of Dynamic Relationship between Grammaticalization and Degrammaticalization
摘要: 语法化是语言演变中一种重要的演变方式，语言世界的可变性决定了语言发展的复杂性，语法化和去语法化构成了一个连续统的动态关系，两者既有共性特征，也有各自的不同之处：它们都是一个渐进的演变过程，但语法化具有普遍性，去语法化具有地域性；尽管演变机制相似，但语法化表现出能产性，去语法化表现出非能产性；虽然两者的演变过程具有逆向性，可是在历时演变中，语法化过程具有官方性，去语法化过程具有非官方性。
Abstract:
Grammaticalization is an important way of language evolution. The variability of language world determines the complexity of language development. Grammaticalization and degrammaticaliza-tion form a continuous dynamic relationship. And they also have generality and individuality. First of all, they are a gradual evolution process, while grammaticalization is universal, and degrammaticalization is regional. Secondly, although the mechanisms are similar with each other, grammaticalization is productive, while degrammaticalization is non-productive. Last but not least, though the evolution of the two is reverse in the diachronic evolution, grammaticalization is official, while degrammaticalization is non-official.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Norde, M. (2009) Degrammaticalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
邵斌, 王文斌. 英语情态动词must的语法化和去语法化认知阐释[J]. 现代外语, 2012(2): 134-141, 218.
|
|
[3]
|
罗耀华, 周晨磊. “抑”的去语法化[J]. 语言教学与研究, 2013(4): 83-90.
|
|
[4]
|
张秀松. 疑问语气副词“究竟”向名词“究竟”的去语法化[J]. 语言科学, 2014, 13(4): 379-395.
|
|
[5]
|
文旭, 杨坤. 去语法化及有关问题——兼论Norde (2009)的去语法化观[J]. 历史语言学研究, 2020(1): 15-24.
|
|
[6]
|
Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. (2003) Grammaticalization. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. (2002) Common Grammaticalization Processes in the Languages of the World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
|
|
[8]
|
Brinton, L.J. and Traugott, E.C. (2005) Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
吴福祥. 汉语方言中的若干逆语法化现象[J]. 中国语文, 2017(3): 259-276+382.
|
|
[10]
|
李炜, 刘亚男. 西南官话的“跟”——从《华西官话汉法词典》说起[J]. 中国语文, 2015(4): 358-363+384.
|