景区质量如何影响区域旅游收入?——基于中介效应和逐步回归分析
How Does the Quality of Scenic Spots Affect Regional Tourism Revenue?—Based on Mediation Effect and Stepwise Regression Analysis
摘要: 旅游景区是旅游业的核心产品,但是区域间的旅游收入差异较大。这些现象背后的原因是什么呢?区域景区质量有哪些维度?这些维度如何影响区域旅游收入?论文以266个区域的A级景区为研究对象,选取景区质量的三个维度——景区丰度、景区密度、景区精度来分析其对区域旅游收入的影响。得出如下结论:1) 景区丰度、景区密度、景区精度对区域旅游收入均有正向影响。2) 游客人数在景区丰度、景区密度、景区精度与区域旅游收入三对关系间均发挥中介效应,均为部分中介,但效应占比有所不同。3) 逐步回归结果中,景区精度存在的情况下,景区丰度对区域旅游收入的影响不显著,且景区精度对区域旅游收入的贡献大于景区密度。
Abstract:
Tourist attractions are the core products of the tourism industry, but there are large differences in tourism income between regions. What are the reasons behind these phenomena? What are the dimensions of the quality of regional scenic spots? How do these dimensions affect regional tourism revenue? This paper takes the A-level scenic spots in 266 regions as the research object, and selects three dimensions that affect the quality of scenic spots—scenic spot abundance, scenic spot density, and scenic spot accuracy to analyze its impact on regional tourism revenue. The following conclusions are drawn: 1) The abundance of scenic spots, the density of scenic spots, and the accuracy of scenic spots have a positive impact on regional tourism revenue. 2) The number of tourists all play a mediating effect among the three pairs of relationship between the abundance of scenic spots, the density of scenic spots, the precision of scenic spots and the regional tourism revenue, all of which are partial mediators, but the proportions of the effects are different. 3) In the stepwise regression results, in the presence of scenic spot accuracy, the influence of scenic spot abundance on regional tourism revenue is not significant, and the contribution of scenic spot accuracy to regional tourism revenue is greater than that of scenic spot density.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Kresic, D. and Prebezac, D. (2011) Index of Destination Attractiveness as a Tool for Destination Attractiveness Assessment. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 59, 497-517.
|
|
[2]
|
罗浩, 颜钰荛, 杨旸. 中国各省的旅游增长方式“因地制宜”吗?——中国省际旅游增长要素贡献与旅游资源比较优势研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2016, 31(3): 43-53.
|
|
[3]
|
许贤棠, 胡静, 陈婷婷. 湖北省旅游资源禀赋空间分异的综合评析[J]. 统计与决策, 2015, 425(5): 107-110.
|
|
[4]
|
龚熊波, 杨波, 黄钦, 等. 基于地理探测器的旅游经济收入驱动力探析——以武陵山集中连片特困地区(湖南)为例[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2021, 44(6): 1-9.
|
|
[5]
|
李飞, 何建民. 中国旅游景区发展的地区差异及其收敛性——以2001-2009年A级景区为例[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2011, 27(4): 83-88+106.
|
|
[6]
|
杨友宝, 王荣成, 李秋雨, 等. 东北地区旅游资源赋存演化特征与旅游业空间重构[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(10): 194-201+209.
|
|
[7]
|
张广海, 赵韦舒. 省域A级景区旅游环境承载力综合评价及障碍因子研究[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 50(6): 944-951.
|
|
[8]
|
邓纯纯, 吴晋峰, 吴珊珊, 等. 中国A级景区等级结构和空间分布特征[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(1): 70-79.
|
|
[9]
|
冯烽, 崔琳昊. 高铁开通与站点城市旅游业发展: “引擎”还是“过道”? [J]. 经济管理, 2020, 42(2): 175-191.
|
|
[10]
|
何仁伟, 李光勤, 曹建华. 酒香真的不怕巷子深吗?——基于国家级风景名胜区的区位选择问题研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(9): 94-107.
|
|
[11]
|
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.
|