知识产权保护对老挝高新技术产品出口质量的影响研究
Study on the Impact of Intellectual Property Protection on the Export Quality of High-Tech Products in Laos
摘要: 质量发展是强国之道。目前在国际上，老挝产品一直都是“水货”、“劣质产品”的代名词，虽然近几年有一些改善，但是与很多国家相比仍然有很大的差距。随着老挝对知识产权的不断重视，越来越多的高端产品开始出现在国际舞台，而知识产权的发展也不断促进老挝出口业务质量的提升。本文主要通过文献研究法、实证分析法等方法分析了知识产权保护与高新技术产品出口质量之间的关系。通过本文的分析主要得到以下的结果：在实证研究方面，本文通过建立多元线性回归模型，将知识产权保护分为不同的变量，研究每一个变量与高新技术出口质量的关系，将高新技术产品出口集中度与出口国地位作为调节变量来建立Var模型，运用Stata软件对数据进行分析。
Abstract: Quality development is the path to a strong country. At present, laotian products are always syn-onymous with “parallel” and “inferior products” in the international market. Although there has been some improvement in recent years, there is still a big gap compared with many countries. As Laos pays more attention to intellectual property rights, more and more high-end products begin to appear on the international stage, and the development of intellectual property rights also continuously promotes the improvement of the quality of Laos’ export business. This paper mainly analyzes the relationship between intellectual property protection and the export quality of high- tech products by means of literature research and empirical analysis. Through the analysis of this paper, the main results are as follows: In empirical research, this article through the establishment of multiple linear regression model, the protection of intellectual property rights can be divided into different variables, each variable and the quality of high and new technology export, the new high-tech product export concentration and exporter as a moderator variable to establish the Var model, using Stata software to analyze data.
文章引用：陆玉治, 钟昌宝. 知识产权保护对老挝高新技术产品出口质量的影响研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2022, 11(4): 1066-1075. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2022.114145

参考文献

[1] 戎娜. 中国应对美国高新技术产品贸易保护问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 东北财经大学, 2014.
[2] Hwang, H., Mai, C.C. and Ohta, H. (2010) Export Subsidies, Cost Differential and Product Quality. Pacific Economic Review, 15, 32-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 董钰, 孙赫. 知识产权保护对产业创新影响的定量分析——以高技术产业为例[J]. 世界经济研究, 2012(4): 11-15+87.
[4] 顾振华, 沈瑶. 知识产权保护、技术创新与技术转移——基于发展中国家的视角[J]. 产业经济研究, 2015(3): 64-73.
[5] Fink, C. and Braga, C.A.R. (2005) How Stronger Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Affects International Trade Flows. In: Fink, C. and Maskus, K.E., Eds., Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research, World Bank, Washington DC, 19-40.
[6] 沈国兵. “美国利益优先”战略背景下中美经贸摩擦升级的风险及中国对策[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 71(5): 91-99.
[7] 王云, 袁永友. 知识产权教育与经贸翻译人才培养探讨[J]. 对外经贸, 2018(8): 153-156.
[8] 李坤望, 王有鑫. FDI促进了中国出口产品质量升级吗?——基于动态面板系统GMM方法的研究[J]. 世界经济研究, 2013(5): 60-66+89.
[9] 李秀芳, 施炳展. 补贴是否提升了企业出口产品质量[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2013(4): 139-148.
[10] 刘思明, 侯鹏, 赵彦云. 知识产权保护与中国工业创新能力——来自省级大中型工业企业面板数据的实证研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2015, 32(3): 40-57.
[11] Gervais, A. (2009) Product Quality, Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade. Mimeo, New York.
[12] 沈国兵, 刘佳. TRIPS协定下中国知识产权保护水平和实际保护强度[J]. 财贸经济, 2009(11): 66-71+60.
[13] 王华. 更严厉的知识产权保护制度有利于技术创新吗[J]. 经济研究, 2011(S2): 124-135.
[14] 张静玉. 聚焦平行进口中的商标法律保护——“第十五届上海知识产权国际论坛暨全球知识产权保护和创新发展大会贸易与商标品牌保护分论坛”综述[J]. 中华商标, 2018(11): 55-58.
[15] 王平, 田彬彬. 知识产权保护对中国FDI质量的影响——基于行业层面的实证分析[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2011(9): 42-46+86.
[16] Diwan, I. and Rodrik, D. (1991) Patents, Appropriate Technology, and North-South Trade. Journal of International Economics, 30, 27-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Ferrantino, M.J. (1993) The Effect of Intellectual Property Rights on International Trade and Investment. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 129, 300-331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Grossman, G.M. and Lai, E.L.C. (2004) International Protection of Intellectual Property. The American Economic Review, 94, 1635-1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Hallak, J.C. and Schott, P.K. (2011) Estimating Cross-Country Differences in Product Quality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 417-474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐