中药辅助化疗治疗晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效及经济学评价的回顾性研究
Retrospective Study on Clinical Efficacy and Economic Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2022.124395, PDF,   
作者: 崔 鹏:青岛大学附属海慈医院肿瘤科,山东 青岛;赵海蓉:青岛大学附属海慈医院全科医学科,山东 青岛;姜倩倩, 于 壮*:青岛大学附属医院肿瘤科,山东 青岛
关键词: 晚期非小细胞肺癌中药辅助治疗临床疗效经济学评价回顾性研究Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Adjuvant Therapy with Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Efficacy Economic Evaluation Retrospective Study
摘要: 目的:回顾性分析晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌中药辅助化疗治疗的临床疗效及经济学评价,为非小细胞肺癌患者提供更有效且经济的治疗方案。方法:回顾性收集2019年1月1日至2020年12月31日在青岛大学附属海慈医院诊治的100例气阴两虚型或者气滞血瘀型晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌患者的临床基本资料。根据是否联合中药辅助化疗治疗分为两组:A组化疗组,B组化疗 + 中药辅助化疗治疗组。所有患者治疗期间,每2个治疗周期进行影像学及血液学检查。本研究主要研究终点临床疗效、医药经济学评价,次要研究终点临床症状改善情况、治疗期间不良反应发生情况、肿瘤标志物水平及阳性情况、免疫指标、生活质量。结果:A组病人50例,B组病人50例。疗效评价:B组患者的客观缓解率较A组明显提高了20.00% (χ2 = 4.762, P < 0.05)。B组患者的咳嗽、胸痛、血痰、食少、乏力、气短改善率均高于A组(P < 0.05)。治疗后,B组患者的CA125、CEA水平及阳性率均低于A组(P < 0.05),两组患者治疗后的CA125、CEA水平及阳性率均低于治疗前(P < 0.05)。治疗后,B组患者的CD3、CD4、CD4/CD8、CIK均高于A组(P < 0.05);两组患者治疗后的CD3、CD4、CD4/CD8、CIK均高于治疗前(P < 0.05)。B组患者的生活质量提高比例高于A组,B组患者治疗期间胃肠道反应发生率高于A组(P < 0.05),肝功能损伤、肾功能损伤、骨髓抑制发生率均低于A组(P < 0.05)。B组患者的C、E均高于A组(P < 0.05),C/E低于A组(P < 0.05),ΔC/ΔE = 104.72。结论:化疗联合中药辅助化疗治疗可明显提高晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌患者的客观缓解率,可有效缓解患者咳嗽、胸痛、血痰、食少、乏力、气短等临床症状,减少化疗相关药物副反应,提高机体免疫功能,经济学效益显著。
Abstract: Objective: To retrospectively study the clinical efficacy and economic evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine adjuvant therapy for advanced non-scale non-small cell lung cancer, so as to provide effective evidence for clinical treatment of patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer more economically and effectively. Methods: This study retrospectively collected the basic clinical data of 100 patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with Qi Yin deficiency or Qi stagnation and blood stasis in Haici Hospital affiliated to Qingdao University from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. According to whether it is combined with the addition and subtraction of fixed traditional Chinese medicine decoction, it is divided into two groups: group A chemotherapy group and group B chemotherapy + addition and subtraction of fixed traditional Chinese medicine decoction adjuvant treatment group. During the treatment period, all patients underwent imaging and hematological examination every two treatment cycles. The main end point of this study was the clinical efficacy and medical economic evaluation, and the secondary end point was the improvement of clinical symptoms, the occurrence of adverse reactions during treatment, the level and positive of tumor markers, immune indexes and quality of life. Results: There were 50 patients in group A and 50 patients in group B. Evaluation of curative effect: the objective remission rate of patients in group B was significantly higher than that in group A by 20.00% (χ2 = 4.762, P < 0.05). The improvement rates of cough, chest pain, blood phlegm, anorexia, fatigue and shortness of breath in group B were higher than those in group A (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels and positive rates of CA125 and CEA in group B were lower than those in group A (P < 0.05), and the levels and positive rates of CA125 and CEA in both groups were lower than those before treatment (P < 0.05). After treatment, CD3, CD4, CD4/CD8 and CIK in group B were higher than those in group A (P < 0.05). After treatment, CD3, CD4, CD4/CD8 and CIK in both groups were higher than those before treatment (P < 0.05). The improvement rate of quality of life in group B was higher than that in group A, the incidence of gastrointestinal reaction in group B was higher than that in group A (P < 0.05), and the incidence of liver function damage, renal function damage and bone marrow suppression were lower than those in group A (P < 0.05). C and E in group B were higher than those in group A (P < 0.05), C/E was lower than that in group A (P < 0.05), the ΔC/ΔE = 104.72. Conclusion: Chemotherapy combined with the addition and subtraction of fixed traditional Chinese medicine decoction can significantly improve the objective remission rate of patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, effectively alleviate the clinical symptoms of patients such as cough, chest pain, blood phlegm, lack of food, fatigue and shortness of breath, reduce the side effects of chemotherapy related drugs, improve the immune function of the body, and have significant economic benefits.
文章引用:崔鹏, 赵海蓉, 姜倩倩, 于壮. 中药辅助化疗治疗晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效及经济学评价的回顾性研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(4): 2753-2763. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2022.124395

参考文献

[1] 赫捷, 李霓, 陈万青, 等. 中国肺癌筛查与早诊早治指南[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2021, 30(2): 81-111.
[2] Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 邹小农, 赵平. 中国癌症态势七十年分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2019, 26(17): 1153-1161.
[4] 黄海红, 冯运, 金永春, 等. 上海某三级专科医院住院肺癌患者经济负担研究[J]. 中国医院管理, 2012, 32(2): 57-59.
[5] 中华医学会, 中华医学会肿瘤分会, 中华医学会杂志社. 中华医学会肺癌临床诊疗指南(2019版) [J]. 中国肿瘤杂志, 2020, 42(4): 257-287.
[6] Schiller, J.H., Harrington, D., Belani, C.P., et al. (2002) Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 92-98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 王洁. 晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗进展[C]//中华医学会、中华医学会呼吸病学分会. 中华医学会第五届全国胸部肿瘤及内窥镜学术会议论文汇编. 海口: 中华医学会, 2011: 29-336.
[8] Tamiya, A., Tamiya, M., Shiroyama, T., et al. (2015) Phase II Trial of Carboplatin, S-1, and Gefitinib as First-Line Triplet Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations. Medical Oncology, 32, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 王伟英, 董良, 李海金, 等. 安罗替尼联合化疗二线治疗酪氨酸激酶抑制剂获得性耐药晚期非小细胞肺癌临床观察[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2020, 27(20): 1669-1673.
[10] 田建辉, 罗斌, 毕凌, 等. 非小细胞肺癌循环肿瘤细胞表达规律及其与“伏邪”致病关系的研究[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2016, 50(1): 15-19.
[11] 李和根. 刘嘉湘教授以扶正法为主治疗肺癌经验[J]. 四川中医, 2005, 23(7): 5-6.
[12] 张亚密, 杨宁, 曹迪, 等. 扶正化瘀方联合化疗治疗中、晚期非小细胞肺癌气虚血瘀证的临床研究[J]. 河北中医, 2020, 42(12): 1820-1823.
[13] 梁亚丽, 王国海, 杜全宇, 等. 中医药防治肺癌的常用治法及应用进展[J]. 甘肃医药, 2021, 40(4): 302-304.
[14] 姚俊. 消癌平注射液联合化疗干预非小细胞肺癌晚期有效性和安全性研究[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2016, 25(24): 2706-2708.
[15] 谢守泳. 加味参芪汤联合TP化疗方案治疗老年肺癌化疗并发症随机平行对照研究[J]. 实用中医内科杂志, 2016, 30(2): 33-35.
[16] 李华, 马箐, 艾萍, 等. 中药预防肿瘤化疗后白细胞减少症随机对照试验的系统评价及Meta分析[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2015, 35(2): 157-166.
[17] 屠小龙, 史国军, 张婷素, 等. 益气祛痰抗癌汤辅助化疗治疗肺癌气虚痰湿证的疗效观察[J]. 中国中医药科技, 2021, 28(3): 439-441.
[18] 杨帆, 姜庆辉, 姜家康, 等. 芪杉方对气阴两虚型晚期非小细胞肺癌患者化疗后免疫功能影响的回顾性分析[J]. 中医药学报, 2020, 48(7): 50-53.
[19] 陈洁. 药物经济学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2006: 200.
[20] 李幼平. 循证医学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 98.
[21] Walkom, E., Robertson, J., Newby, D., et al. (2006) The Role of Pharmacoeconomics in formulary Decision-Making. Formulary, 41, 374-385.
[22] Rameckers, E. (2001) Using Health Outcomes Data to Inform Decision-Making: Patient Perspective. Pharmacoeconomics, 19, 53-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Sanchez, L.A. (1999) Applied Pharmacoeconomics: Evaluation and Use of Pharmacoeconomic Data from the Literature. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 56, 1630-1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Tilson, L., O’Leary, A., Usher, C., et al. (2010) Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation in Ireland: A Review of the Process. Pharmacoeconomics, 28, 307-322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] 吴晶, 孙利华, 刘国恩. 中国药物经济学学科发展现状[J]. 中国药物经学, 2008(6): 29-36.
[26] 李明晖, 李洪超, 马爱霞. 我国药物经济学评价研究的现状、问题及建议[J]. 中国药房, 2008, 19(11): 801-805.
[27] 杨武韬, 裴艳霞. 热毒宁治疗儿童急性呼吸道感染伴发热临床疗效的探讨[J]. 中国药物评价, 2017, 34(6): 424-426.
[28] 高亚, 蔺小艳, 李戟玭, 等. 仿制药一致性评价的可视化分析[J]. 中国药物评价, 2017, 34(4): 241-245.
[29] 孙利昆, 柳芳, 陈文倩, 等. 基于Meta分析的小金丸治疗乳腺增生疗效评价[J]. 中国药物评价, 2016, 33(5): 448-451, 456.
[30] 何耀, 张素华, 刘芳芳, 等. 我国药物经济学研究的现状调查[J]. 中国药物评价, 2013, 30(4): 253-256.
[31] 皮啸环, 唐佳, 李沐阳, 等. 我国中药联合化药药物经济学研究方法分析[J]. 中国药物评价, 2018, 35(3): 161-166.