基于二次–凸扫频声源的声学法烟气速度测量研究
Study on Acoustic Method of Flue Gas Velocity Measurement Based on Quadratic-Convex Frequency Sweeping Sound Source
摘要: 燃煤电厂中烟气速度测量的准确性是电厂的安全生产和效率提升的基础。本文采用一种新颖的二次–凸扫频声学驱动模式,对燃煤电厂脱硝后烟气流速进行了长周期的测量研究。通过对脱硝烟道内部的背景噪声分析,确定了二次–凸声源频率范围为4 kHz~8 kHz,并通过互相关时延估计算法计算声波飞渡时间。经过理论分析和现场实验,验证了该驱动模式的有效性。通过对测试数据的功率谱密度(PSD)、均方根误差(RMSE)和标准偏差(SD)的分析,对基于三种驱动模式的测速结果的准确性和稳健性进行了定量评估。现场实验结果表明,基于二次–凸扫频驱动模式的RMSESD值均小于0.3 m/s。与传统采用的线性扫频方法相比,所提出的声波驱动方案可以显著提高烟气速度测量的准确性和稳健性。
Abstract: The accuracy of flue gas velocity measurements in coal-fired power plants is fundamental to the safe production and efficiency improvement of the plants. In this paper, a novel quadratic-convex frequency sweeping driven mode drive mode is used to study the long-period measurement of flue gas flow velocity after denitrification in coal-fired power plants. By analyzing the background noise inside the denitrification flue, the frequency range of the quadratic-convex frequency sweeping sound source is determined to be 4 kHz~8 kHz, and the acoustic fly-through time is calculated by a mutual-off time delay estimation algorithm. After theoretical analysis and field experiments, the effectiveness of this driving mode was verified. The accuracy and robustness of the velocimetry results based on the three driving modes were quantitatively evaluated by analyzing the power spectral density (PSD), root mean square error (RMSE) and standard deviation (SD) of the test data. The field experimental results show that the RMSE and SD values based on the quadratic-convex frequency sweeping driven mode are less than 0.3 m/s. The proposed acoustic wave driving scheme can significantly improve the accuracy and robustness of the flue gas velocity measurements compared with the traditionally adopted linear sweep method.
文章引用:高伯赋, 刘鹏, 徐江, 周宾, 刘奇. 基于二次–凸扫频声源的声学法烟气速度测量研究[J]. 传感器技术与应用, 2022, 10(2): 246-254. https://doi.org/10.12677/JSTA.2022.102030

参考文献

[1] 赵万里. 火电厂SCR烟气脱硝的催化剂应用性能分析研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 新乡: 河南师范大学, 2014.
[2] Fischer, A. (2017) Model-Based Review of Doppler Global Velocimetry Techniques with Laser Frequency Modulation. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 93, 19-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Westerweel, J., Elsinga, G.E. and Adrian, R.J. (2013) Particle Image Velocimetry for Complex and Turbulent Flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 45, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Dai, M., Zhou, B., Zhang, J., et al. (2022) Experimental and Simulation Investigation of 3-D Soot Temperature and Volume Fraction Fields of Afterburner Flame. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 33, Article ID: 101932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 许国强, 段拼搏, 张恩先, 等. 非均匀流场CO2浓度分布测量方法研究[J]. 应用激光, 2021, 41(3): 590-598.
[6] 王明, 向鹏, 祁建民, 等. 基于改进卷积神经网络的激光吸收光谱层析成像[J]. 应用激光, 2021, 41(4): 890-901.
[7] 韩雨佳, 陈钻, 薛志亮, 等. 基于吸收光谱技术的气流速度测量研究[J]. 激光与红外, 2019, 49(6): 686-691.
[8] 蔡伟, 刘奇, 周宾, 等. 基于声学法的送风机风速测量实验研究[J]. 仪表技术与传感器, 2021(6): 100-103+114.
[9] 佟纯涛. 燃煤机组烟气流量软测量技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2017.
[10] 陈栋, 任思远, 沈国清, 等. 基于声学技术的非接触式烟气流速测量实验[J]. 热力发电, 2018, 47(1): 66-71.
[11] Farina, A. (2000) Simultaneous Measurement of Impulse Response and Distortion with a Swept-Sine Technique. Audio Engineering Society, New York.
[12] Ćirić, D.G., Marković, M., Mijić, M., et al. (2013) On the Effects of Nonlinearities in Room Impulse Response Measurements with Exponential Sweeps. Applied Acoustics, 74, 375-382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Roggerone, V., Ré-billat, M. and Corteel, É. (2017) Parallel Hammerstein Models Identification Using Sine Sweeps and the Welch Method. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50, 14040-14045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 罗振, 田丰, 孙小平. 炉膛声波飞行时间测量中声源信号的选取研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2007(1): 329-332.
[15] 唐小明, 吴昊, 刘志坤. 基于广义互相关算法的时延估计研究[J]. 电声技术, 2009(8): 73-76.
[16] 沈国清, 杨杰栋, 陈栋, 等. 基于二次相关PHAT-β算法的锅炉声学测温时延估计研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2018, 38(8): 617-623.
[17] Liu, Q., Zhou, B., Cheng, R., et al. (2022) High Temporal Resolution Pyrometry and Velocimetry Based on Acoustic Frequency Division Multiplexing. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 71, Article ID: 6500511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 安连锁, 张世平, 李庚生, 等. 电站锅炉声学监测中互相关时延估计影响因素研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2012, 32(2): 112-117.
[19] Liu, Q., Zhou, B., Zhang, J., et al. (2021) De-velopment of Flue Gas Audio-Range Velocimeter Using Quadratic-Convex Frequency Sweeping. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21, 9777-9787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef