装配式建筑组合楼板研究现状
Research Status of Prefabricated Building Composite Floor
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2022.114058, PDF,   
作者: 谢常风：安徽工业大学，建筑工程学院，安徽 马鞍山
关键词: 装配式建筑；组合楼板；研究现状；Prefabricated Buildings； Composite Floor； Research Status
摘要: 装配式建筑作为近年来热门建造方式之一，在国家相关政策扶持与推动下得到了全方位的推广和发展。而楼板作为装配式建筑体系中重要构件，楼板的合理选用对结构体系的施工进度和工程造价有着至关重要的作用。组合楼板作为楼板的形式之一，凭借免支模、施工速度快且能够大幅提升装配式预制率等优势，在装配式建筑中得到较为广泛的应用。因此本文从试验研究、理论分析以及数值模拟等方面对整浇楼板、压型钢板–混凝土组合楼板、钢筋桁架混凝土叠合板以及不同构造形式的叠合板发展历程研究现状进行总结，对比四种不同类型楼板优缺点，从而为后续研究工作提供进一步参考。
Abstract: As one of the popular construction methods in recent years, prefabricated building has been promoted and developed comprehensively under the support and promotion of relevant national policies. The floor slab is an important component in the prefabricated building system. The reasonable selection of floor slab plays a vital role in the construction progress and cost of the whole structure. As one of the forms of floor slab, composite floor slab has been widely used in prefabricated buildings by virtue of its advantages of free formwork, fast construction speed and greatly improved prefabrication rate. Therefore, from the aspects of experimental research, theoretical analysis and numerical simulation, this paper summarizes the development process and research status of concrete slab, profiled steel plate-concrete composite floor slab, reinforced truss concrete composite slab and composite slab with different structural forms, and compares the advantages and disadvantages of four different types of floor slab, so as to provide further reference for follow-up research work.
文章引用：谢常风. 装配式建筑组合楼板研究现状[J]. 土木工程, 2022, 11(4): 535-541. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2022.114058

参考文献

[1] 曹万林, 张洁, 董宏英, 乔崎云, 周中一. 中强再生混凝土楼板抗弯性能试验研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2015, 24(3): 112-119.
[2] Spathelf, C.A. and Vogel, T. (2018) Fatigue Performance of Orthogonally Reinforced Concrete Slabs: Experimental Investigation. Engineering Structures, 168, 69-81.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Moon, S.K. and Lee, D.G. (1994) Effects of Inplane Floor Slab Flexibility on the Seismic Behaviour of Building Structures. Engineering Structures, 16, 129-144.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] 狄生奎, 杨万辉, 王立宪, 项长生. 考虑挠度影响的钢筋混凝土楼板可靠度分析[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2017, 43(1): 122-126.
[5] 王洪涛, 刘嫄春, 邵新妍, 李爽. 钢筋混凝土楼板均质化有限元模型[J]. 特种结构, 2017, 34(3): 21-26.
[6] 刘晓娟, 袁康. 现浇楼板温度收缩裂缝的有限元分析[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 25(3): 361-363.
[7] Kataoka, M.N., Friedrich, J.T. and El Debs, A.L.H.C. (2017) Experimental Investigation of Longitudinal Shear Behavior for Composite Floor Slab. Steel and Composite Structures, 23, 351-362.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Ferrer, M., Marimon, F. and Casafont, M. (2018) An Experimental Investigation of a New Perfect Bond Technology for Composite Slabs. Construction and Building Materials, 166, 618-633.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Shivam, S., Varun, T.V. and Anil, A. (2019) Insulation Effect of the Concrete Slab-Steel Deck Interface in Fire Conditions and Its Influence on the Structural Fire Behavior of Composite Floor Systems. Fire Safety Journal, 105, 79-91.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 陈世鸣. 压型钢板-混凝土组合楼板的承载能力研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2002, 23(3): 19-26.
[11] Hossain, K.M.A., Attarde, S. and Anwar, M.S. (2019) Finite Element Modelling of Profiled Steel Deck Composite Slab System with Engineered Cementitious Composite under Monotonic Loading. Engineering Structures, 186, 13-25.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Fewer, M., Marimon, F. and Crisinel, M. (2006) Designing Cold-Formed Steel Sheets for Composite Slabs: An Experimentally Validated FEM Approach to Slip Failure Mechanics. Thin-Walled Structures, 44, 1261-1271.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] 王森军, 杨俊杰, 郑懿, 邹传仁. 压型钢板混凝土组合板抗弯承载力影响因素的分析[J]. 浙江工业大学学报, 2006, 34(5): 580-583.
[14] Gholamhoseini, A., Gilbert, R.I., Bradford, M.A. and Chang, Z.T. (2014) Longitudinal Shear Stress and Bond-Slip Relationships in Composite Concrete Slabs. Engineering Structures, 69, 37-48.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] 郝家欢. 压型钢板-混凝土组合楼板剪切粘结滑移性能试验研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2007.
[16] Li, Y.X., Jiang, L., Yu, Z.Q., Li, J. and Li, Y.W. (2012) Test Research on the Behaviors of Steel Bar Truss and Concrete Superimposed Floor Slabs. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 166-169, 3-8.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Liu, Y.L., Huang, J.Q., Chong, X. and Ye, X.-G. (2021) Experimental Investigation on Flexural Performance of Semi-Precast Reinforced Concrete One-Way Slab with Joint. Structural Concrete, 22, 2243-2257.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] 黄新宇, 郝彬, 吴胤, 熊梦雅. 钢筋桁架混凝土叠合板变形理论研究及试验分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2019, 49(s1): 650-654.
[19] 刘运林. 双向叠合楼板拼缝处受力机理试验研究与数值模拟[D]: [博士学位论文]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2014.
[20] Nikhil, G., Das Chakladar, N., Gangadhara Prusty, B., Song, C. and Phillips, A.W. (2020) Modelling of Laminated Composite Plates with Weakly Bonded Interfaces Using Scaled Boundary Finite Element Method. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 170, Article ID: 105349.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Majdi, Y., Hsu, C. and Zarei, M. (2014) Finite Element Analysis of New Composite Floors Having Cold-Formed Steel and Concrete Slab. Engineering Structures, 77, 65-83.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] 李晓明, 黄小坤, 蒋勤俭, 田春雨, 赵勇, 朱茜, 等. JGJ 1-2014. 装配式混凝土结构技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014: 8.
[23] 赵基达, 徐有邻, 黄小坤, 朱爱萍, 王晓峰, 傅剑平, 等. GB 50010-2010. 混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
[24] 程志军, 田春雨, 李然, 赵勇, 赵作周, 谢旺兰, 等. T/CECS 715-2020. 钢筋桁架混凝土叠合板应用技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2020.
[25] 黄炜, 罗斌, 李斌, 徐学坤, 苏衍江. 不同构造形式绿色混凝土叠合板受弯性能试验[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 46(7): 35-44.
[26] Liu, J.P., Hu, H.F., Li, J., Chen, Y.F. and Zhang, L. (2020) Flexural Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Composite Slab with Precast Inverted T-Shaped Ribbed Panels. Engineering Structures, 215, Article ID: 110687.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] 李明, 王浩然, 赵唯坚. 单向带抗剪键叠合板的受力性能试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(2): 654-667.
[28] 蒋昭奕. 叠合面粘结程度对混凝土叠合板承载性能影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2017.

为你推荐