不同插值方法下的土壤重金属污染三维空间分析
Three-Dimensional Spatial Analysis of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution under Different Interpolation Methods
DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2022.122032, PDF,   
作者: 陈 诚:上海富嗣工程咨询有限公司,上海
关键词: 土壤重金属污染三维空间插值Heavy Metals in Soil Pollution Three-Dimensional Spatial Interpolation
摘要: 为确定某地块区域内土壤污染物的空间变异与三维分布状况,选择退役某合金制造工厂内土壤重金属Cu为研究对象,对比Kriging、IDW和Nearest Neighbor 3种三维空间插值方法对污染预测的不确定性影响。结果表明,不同插值模型计算结果差异较大。交叉验证结果表明:Kriging模型插值精度最高,其预测结果能较真实地反映实际污染情况;三维可视化方法相较于传统的二维空间分析可以解决二维平面不能直观展示污染物垂直空间变化的问题,可以多方式多角度展示土壤信息,反映土壤内部污染物形态。
Abstract: In order to determine the spatial variability and three-dimensional distribution of soil pollutants in contaminated sites, the soil heavy metal Cu in a certain alloy manufacturing plant was selected as the research object, and the uncertainty effects of three 3D spatial interpolation methods on pollution prediction, Kriging, IDW and Nearest Neighbor were compared. The results show that the results of different difference models are large. The cross-validation results show that the Kriging model has the highest interpolation accuracy, and the prediction results can reflect the actual pollution situation. Compared with the traditional two-dimensional spatial analysis, the three-dimensional visualization method can solve the problem that the two-dimensional plane cannot visually display the vertical spatial changes of pollutants, and can display soil information in multiple ways and at multiple angles, reflecting the form of pollutants in the soil.
文章引用:陈诚. 不同插值方法下的土壤重金属污染三维空间分析[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2022, 12(2): 244-250. https://doi.org/10.12677/AEP.2022.122032

参考文献

[1] 郑黎明, 袁静. 重金属污染土壤植物修复技术及其强化措施[J]. 环境科技, 2017, 30(1): 75-78.
[2] 祁迎春, 应婷, 田浩, 等. 陕北公路旁土壤、农作物重金属污染特征与评价[J]. 环境科技, 2016, 29(3): 52-57.
[3] 周以富, 董亚英. 几种重金属土壤污染及其防治的研究进展[J]. 环境科学动态, 2003(1): 15-16.
[4] 唐小亮, 吴以中, 张瑜. 氯丹和灭蚁灵在典型污染地块的空间分布研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(4): 942-948.
[5] Liu, G., Niu, J., Guo, W., et al. (2017) Assessment of Terrain Factors on the Pattern and Extent of Soil Contamination Surrounding a Chemical Industry in Chongqing, Southwest China. Catena, 156, 237-243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1996) Method 3050B: Acid Digestion of Sediments Sludges and Soils.
[7] 巍文侠, 宋博宇, 李培中, 等. 三维可视化建模方法在污染地块中的应用[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2016, 6(4): 384-390.
[8] Pan, G., Moss, K., Heiner, T., et al. (1992) A Fortran Program for Three Dimensional Cokriging with Case Demonstration. Computers & Geosciences, 18, 557-578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Triantafilis, J., Odeh, I.O.A. and McBrantney, A.B. (2001) Five Geostatistical Models to Predict Soil Salinity from Electromagnetic Induction Data across Irrigated Cotton. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65, 869-878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 李洪义. 滨海盐土三维土体电导率空间变异及可视化研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2008.
[11] 王政权. 地统计学及在生态学中的应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
[12] Webster, R. and Norteliff, S. (1984) Improved Estimation of Micronutriens in Hectare Plots of the Sonning Series. European Journal of Soil Science, 35, 667-672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 刘庚, 毕如田, 权腾, 等. 某焦化地块土壤中多环芳烃分布的三维空间插值研究[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(11): 2876-2883.
[14] 韩霁昌, 李晓明, 孙剑虹, 等. 卤泊滩典型田块土壤盐分三维空间分布研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(5): 847-854.