承诺型人力资源管理实践对知识分享的影响
The Impact of Commitment-Based Human Resource Management Practices on Knowledge Sharing
摘要: 知识分享对提升组织核心竞争力至关重要,因此如何激励员工分享知识成为当下人力资源管理的现实问题。针对以上问题,本研究在社会交换理论研究的基础上构建了承诺型人力资源管理实践、组织地位感知、知识自我效能感与知识分享之间关系的假设模型。本研究采用问卷调查方式收集398份数据,得出以下结论:承诺型人力资源管理实践对员工知识分享行为有显著的积极影响;组织地位感知在承诺型人力资源管理实践与知识分享之间起中介作用;员工基于知识的自我效能感调节组织地位感知对知识分享的影响。由此,本文从实施承诺型人力资源管理实践、维护组织地位感知和提升知识自我效能感三个方面给企业管理实践提出可行性建议。
Abstract: Knowledge sharing is crucial to enhance the core competitiveness of an organization, so how to motivate employees to share their knowledge and skills has become a real issue in human resource management nowadays. In view of the above problems, based on the research of social exchange theory, this paper constructs a hypothetical model of the relationship between commitment-based human resource management practices, organizational status, knowledge self-efficacy and knowledge sharing. We collected data from 398 employees by questionnaire. The results are as followed: commitment-based human resource management practice has a significant positive impact on employees’ knowledge sharing behavior; Organizational status plays a mediated role between commitment-based human resource management practices and knowledge sharing; Employees’ knowledge-based self-efficacy moderates the impact of organizational status perception on knowledge sharing. Therefore, this study puts forward corresponding suggestions on enterprise management practice, such as constructing commitment-based human resource management practices, maintaining organizational status and improving knowledge self-efficacy.
文章引用:桑雨, 赵继新. 承诺型人力资源管理实践对知识分享的影响[J]. 现代管理, 2022, 12(4): 463-473. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2022.124062

参考文献

[1] Homans, G.C. (1958) Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Walton, R.E. (1985) From Control to Commitment in the Workplace. Harvard Business Review, 1, 15-29.
[3] Arthur, J.B. (1994) Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 670-687.
[4] Allen, D.G., Shore, L.M. and Griffeth, R.W. (2003) The Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Supportive Human Resource Practices in the Turnover Process. Journal of Management, 29, 99-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Easa, N.F. and Orra, H.E. (2020) HRM Practices and Innovation: An Empirical Systematic Review. International Journal of Disruptive Innovation in Government, 1, 15-35.
[6] 陈小平, 肖鸣政. 高承诺人力资源实践与科技企业绩效——有调节的中介模型[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(8): 156-165.
[7] Seeman, T.E. and Berkman, L.F. (1988) Structural Characteristics of Social Networks and Their Relationship with Social Support in the Elderly: Who Provides Support. Social Science & Medicine, 26, 737-749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Eisenberger, R., Stingl hamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I.L. and Rhoades, L. (2002) Perceived Supervisor Support: Contributions to Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565-573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Bock, G.W. and Kim, Y.G. (2002) Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15, 14-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Bandura, A. (1977) Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Advances in Behaviour Research & Therapy, 1, 139-161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.G. and Lee, J.-N. (2005) Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29, 87-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Grant, R.M. (1996) Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Bart, V.D.H. and De Ridder, J.A. (2004) Knowledge Sharing in Context: The Influence of Organizational Commitment, Communication Climate and CMC Use on Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8, 117-130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Karagoz, Y., Whiteside, N. and Korthaus, A. (2020) Context Matters: Enablers and Barriers to Knowledge Sharing in Australian Public Sector ICT Projects. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24, 1921-1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Raza, I. and Awang, Z. (2020) Knowledge Sharing Practices in Higher Educational Institutes of Islamabad, Pakistan: An Empirical Study Based on Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 20, 1809-1842.
[16] Abdelwhab Ali, A., Panneer Selvam, D.D.D., Paris, L. and Gunasekaran, A. (2019) Key Factors Influencing Knowledge Sharing Practices and Its Relationship with Organizational Performance within the Oil and Gas Industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23, 1806-1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Collins, C.J. and Smith, K.G. (2006) Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 544-560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Chiang, H.-H., Han, T.-S. and Nielsen, P. (2011) The Relationship between High-Commitment HRM and Knowledge-Sharing Behavior and Its Mediators. International Journal of Manpower, 32, 604-622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 袁勇志, 何会涛, 彭纪生. 承诺型人力资源实践与知识共享的作用机制研究——组织内社会资本中介作用的实证检验[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010, 31(1): 171-177.
[20] 刘宗华, 李燕萍, 郑馨怡. 高承诺工作系统与知识分享的关系:内部人身份感知和工作嵌入的作用[J]. 当代经济管理, 2017, 39(7): 62-68.
[21] 李燕萍, 刘宗华. 高承诺人力资源管理实践对知识分享的影响机制[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学•人文科学•社会科学), 2015, 52(4): 140-149+160.
[22] 丁道韧. 组织地位感知对创新性前摄行为的作用——基于心理资本的中介作用与变革型领导的调节作用[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(2): 326-334.
[23] 王辉, 聂巧媛. 包容性领导对员工创新行为的影响——员工信任和创新自我效能感的作用[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 15(2): 1-12.
[24] 许晓东, 魏志轩, 郑君怡. 研究生知识共享对其科研绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2021, 18(3): 434-440.
[25] 焦乐. 职业女性工作压力与工作绩效关系研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北经贸大学, 2015.
[26] 阎海峰, 陈灵燕. 承诺型人力资源管理实践、知识分享和组织创新的关系研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2010(5): 92-98+106.
[27] 周建涛, 廖建桥. 权力距离导向与员工建言: 组织地位感知的影响[J]. 管理科学, 2012, 25(1): 35-44.
[28] Lin, L., Leung, K. and Koch, P.T. (2006) Managerial Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Individual, Interpersonal, and Organizational Factors. Management and Organization Review, 2, 15-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef