同科目理论课程与实践课程时序安排及教学效果研究——以建筑学专业《城市设计》科目为例
A Study on the Time Arrangement and Teaching Effect of Theory Course and Practice Course in Same Subject—Taking “Urban Design” Courses of Architecture Major as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/CES.2022.105154, PDF,   
作者: 毛骏亚, 李 晨:华东交通大学土木建筑学院,江西 南昌;李传成:武汉理工大学土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 设计类工科专业理论课程实践课程课程时序教学效果Design Major of Engineering Theory Course Practice Course Course Sequence Teaching Effect
摘要: 文章针对高校中设计类工科专业课程中普遍存在的由于授课时间安排导致同时出现专业理论课程前置于专业实践课程与专业理论课程、实践课程同步进行的两种授课模式,选取了代表性强,课程进度安排清晰,考察环节多样且能充分反映教学效果的建筑学专业《城市设计》课程进行教学效果研究。明确了“理论课程前置”模式的整体教学效果更优,“同步模式”中实践课程对理论课程的反向促进效果更好。文中进一步针对两类课程具体理论知识点授课内容和时间安排提出了优化调整对策。
Abstract: Because of the teaching schedule and time arrangement, there are two kinds of teaching modes which are common in design major courses of engineering in colleges and universities. One of them is Theory courses precede Practice courses, another is Theory course and Practice course are carried out in the same time. This paper chooses urban design courses of architecture major which has strong representativeness, clear curriculum schedule, various inspection phases and can fully reflect the teaching effect to study the teaching effect. It is clear that the overall teaching effect of “Pre mode” which Theory courses are set advanced is better, and the promoting effect on Theory course of Practice course in “synchronous mode” is better. This paper further puts forward optimization strategies in teaching content and time arrangement of Theory courses and Practice courses.
文章引用:毛骏亚, 李晨, 李传成. 同科目理论课程与实践课程时序安排及教学效果研究——以建筑学专业《城市设计》科目为例[J]. 创新教育研究, 2022, 10(5): 951-960. https://doi.org/10.12677/CES.2022.105154

参考文献

[1] 杨俊宴, 高源, 雒建利. 城市设计教学体系中的培养重点与方法研究[J]. 城市规划, 2011, 35(8): 55-59.
[2] 教育部关于印发《关于加强高等学校本科教学工作提高教学质量的若干意见》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A08/gjs_left/s5664/moe_1623/201001/t20100129_88633.html, 2001-08-28.
[3] 住房和城乡建设部. 全国高等学校建筑学专业教育评估文件(2018年版总第六版) [EB/OL]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/jsrc/zypg/201806/t20180622_236511.html, 2018-06-22.
[4] 董慰, 董禹. 新一级学科划分背景下城市设计教学探讨[J]. 城市建筑, 2014(10): 46-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 杨春侠, 耿慧志. 城市设计教育体系的分析和建议——以美国高校的城市设计教育体系和核心课程为借鉴[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2017(1): 103-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 涂慧君, 李宛蓉, 周聪, 汤佩佩. 基于多种主体参与的建筑策划理论介入城市设计课程方法研究[J]. 中国建筑教育, 2020(1): 52-58.