经阴道宫颈环扎术治疗复发性流产合并宫颈机能不全的疗效分析
Transvaginal Cervical Cerclage for Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion with Cervical Insufficiency
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2022.125589, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 钟兰萍, 陶丽梅, 马 蕊, 康晓敏*:云南省第一人民医院,昆明理工大学附属医院生殖医学科,云南 昆明
关键词: 宫颈机能不全经阴道宫颈环扎术复发性流产妊娠结局Cervical Incompetence Transvaginal Cervical Cerclage Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion Pregnancy Outcomes
摘要: 目的:评价经阴道宫颈环扎术(transvaginal cervical cerclage, TVC)对复发性流产(recurrent sponta-neous abortion, RSA)合并宫颈机能不全(cervical insufficiency, CI)患者的治疗效果。方法:选取2019年1月至2021年12月在我院接受TVC治疗合并CI的RSA患者作为研究对象,根据手术时机将其分为治疗性宫颈环扎组(80例)、紧急性宫颈环扎组(18例)及选择性宫颈环扎组(40例),并对其临床疗效进行综合分析。结果:与紧急性宫颈环扎相比,选择性宫颈环扎和治疗性宫颈环扎至分娩间隔明显延长(35.4天 vs 105.3天;35.4天 vs 92.4天;P < 0.001)。出生体重 ≥ 2000 g新生儿比率在治疗性宫颈环扎组最高(87.5%),其次是选择性宫颈环扎组(65.0%)和紧急性宫颈环扎组(33.3%),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与选择性宫颈环扎组(72.22%)和紧急性宫颈环扎组(77.5%)相比,治疗性宫颈环扎组患者的活产率(95%)更高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。无论是选择性宫颈环扎组还是治疗性宫颈环扎组,相比流产次数 ≥ 3次的患者,流产次数 < 3次的患者在分娩时有更长的胎龄(P < 0.05)。在选择性宫颈环扎组中,相比孕20周后行宫颈环扎,孕20周前行宫颈环扎的患者的新生儿体重更重,分娩的孕周更大(P < 0.05;P < 0.01)。在治疗性宫颈环扎组中,相比孕20周后行宫颈环扎,在孕20周前进行宫颈环扎患者的新生儿体重更重(P < 0.01)。结论:TVC是一种有效的干预措施,可以延长合并CI的RSA患者孕周,预防早产发生,进行宫颈环扎术的最佳手术时间应在妊娠20周之前。
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effect of Transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC) for Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) patients with cervical insufficiency (CI). Method: RSA patients with CI treated in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2021. These patients who received TVC were categorized into emergent, elective and therapeutic groups. Results: A significant pregnancy prolongation was observed in the elective and therapeutic group (105.3 d and 92.4 d, respectively), compared with the emergent group (35.4 d, P < 0.001). Incidence of birth weight ≥ 2000 g tended to be highest in therapeutic group (87.5%), followed by the elective (65.0%) and the emergency groups (33.3%, respectively, P < 0.05). Patients in therapeutic group tended to have higher live birth rate (95%), compared with the elective and emergent group (72.22% and 77.5%, respectively, P < 0.05). Com-pared to women who had ≥ 3 abortions, those who had < 3 abortions were more likely to have long-er gestation week at delivery whether in the elective group or therapeutic group (P < 0.05). Those women in the elective group who were cerclaged before 20th gestation week could have heavier neonate weight and longer gestation week than those who were cerclaged after 20th gestation week (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Those women who were therapeutic cerclaged before 20th gestation week could have heavier neonate weight than the woman who were cerclaged after 20th gestation week (P < 0.01). Conclusion: TVC is an efficacious intervention that prolongs pregnancy and prevents preterm births in RSA patients with CI. The best time to do a elective cerclage is be-fore the gestional age of 20 weeks.
文章引用:钟兰萍, 陶丽梅, 马蕊, 康晓敏. 经阴道宫颈环扎术治疗复发性流产合并宫颈机能不全的疗效分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(5): 4072-4079. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2022.125589

参考文献

[1] Vousden, N., Hezelgrave, N., Carter, J., Seed, P.T. and Shennan, A.H. (2015) Prior Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage: How Should We Manage the Next Pregnancy? European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 188, 129-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Song, J.E. and Lee, K.Y. (2015) Prediction of Out-come for Transabdominal Cerclage in Women with Cervical Insufficiency. BioMed Research International, 2015, Article ID: 985764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Drakeley, A.J., Roberts, D. and Alfirevic, Z. (2003) Cervi-cal Stitch (Cerclage) for Preventing Pregnancy Loss in Women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 1, Arti-cle No. CD003253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Ioscovich, A., Popov, A., Gimelfarb, Y., Gozal, Y., Or-bach-Zinger, S., Shapiro, J., et al. (2015) Anesthetic Management of Prophylactic Cervical Cerclage: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 291, 509-512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Ragab, A. and Mesbah, Y. (2015) To Do or Not to Do Emer-gency Cervical Cerclage (a Rescue Stitch) at 24-28 Weeks Gestation in Addition to Progesterone for Patients Coming Early in Labor? A Prospective Randomized Trial for Efficacy and Safety. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 292, 1255-1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Repke, J.T. (2011) Women with Prior Preterm Birth and Short Cervix: Do NOT Cerclage. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 205, 89-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Alfirevic, Z., Owen, J., Carreras Moratonas, E., Sharp, A.N., Szychowski, J.M. and Goya, M. (2013) Vaginal Progesterone, Cerclage or Cervical Pessary for Preventing Preterm Birth in Asymptomatic Singleton Pregnant Women with a History of Preterm Birth and a Sonographic Short Cervix. Ultra-sound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 41, 146-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Israfil-Bayli, F., Toozs-Hobson, P., Lees, C., Slack, M. and Ismail, K.M. (2013) Pregnancy Outcome after Elective Cervical Cerclage in Relation to Type of Suture Material Used. Medical Hy-potheses, 81, 119-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] The Lancet (2008) Preterm Birth: What Can Be Done? Lancet, 371, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Fortner, K.B., Fitzpatrick, C.B., Grotegut, C.A., Swamy, G.K., Murtha, A.P., Heine, R.P., et al. (2012) Cervical Dilation as a Predictor of Pregnancy Outcome Following Emergency Cerclage. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 25, 1884-1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Zhu, L.Q., Chen, H., Chen, L.B., Liu, Y.L., Tian, J.P., Wang, Y.H., et al. (2015) Effects of Emergency Cervical Cerclage on Pregnancy Outcome: A Retrospective Study of 158 Cases. Medical Science Monitor, 21, 1395-1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Yalvac, S., Esin, S., Kocak, O., Yirci, B. and Kandemir, O. (2014) Effect of Body Mass Index on Latency Periods after History-Indicated Cervical Cerclage. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 54, 121-125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Ko, H.S., Jo, Y.S., Kil, K.C., Chang, H.K., Park, Y.G., Park, I.Y., et al. (2011) The Clinical Significance of Digital Examination-Indicated Cerclage in Women with a Dilated Cervix at 14 0/7-29 6/7 Weeks. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 8, 529-536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Berghella, V. and Mackeen, A.D. (2011) Cervical Length Screening with Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage Compared with History-Indicated Cerclage for Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Me-ta-Analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 118, 148-155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Ra-faeli-Yehudai, T., Kessous, R., Aricha-Tamir, B., Sheiner, E., Erez, O., Meirovitz, M., et al. (2014) The Effect of Cervi-cal Cerclage on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Following Conization. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Med-icine, 27, 1594-1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Ciancimino, L., Laganà, A.S., Imbesi, G., Chiofalo, B., Mancuso, A. and Triolo, O. (2015) Evaluation of Maternal-Fetal Outcomes after Emergency Vaginal Cerclage Performed With Shirodkar-McDonald Combined Modified Technique. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 7, 319-323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Abu Hashim, H., Al-Inany, H. and Kilani, Z. (2014) A Re-view of the Contemporary Evidence on Rescue Cervical Cerclage. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 124, 198-203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Melamed, N., Hiersch, L., Domniz, N., Maresky, A., Bardin, R. and Yogev, Y. (2013) Predictive Value of Cervical Length in Women with Threatened Preterm Labor. Obstet-rics & Gynecology, 122, 1279-1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage (1993) Final Report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Multicentre Random-ised Trial of Cervical Cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. BJOG, 100, 516-523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Wood, S.L. and Owen, J. (2016) Cerclage: Shirodkar, McDonald, and Modifications. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 59, 302-310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Romero, R., Yeo, L., Chaemsaithong, P., Chaiworapongsa, T. and Hassan, S.S. (2014) Progesterone to Prevent Spontaneous Preterm Birth. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medi-cine, 19, 15-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Khan, M.J., Ali, G., Al Tajir, G. and Sulieman, H. (2012) Evaluation of Outcomes Associated with Placement of Elective, Urgent, and Emergency Cerclage. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 62, 660-664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Nelson, L., Dola, T., Tran, T., Carter, M., Luu, H. and Dola, C. (2009) Pregnancy Outcomes Following Placement of Elective, Urgent and Emergent Cerclage. The Journal of Mater-nal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 22, 269-273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Abbott, D., To, M. and Shennan, A. (2012) Cervical Cerclage: A Review of Current Evidence. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 52, 220-223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Rafael, T.J., Berghella, V. and Alfirevic, Z. (2014) Cervi-cal Stitch (Cerclage) for Preventing Preterm Birth in Multiple Pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 9, Article No. CD009166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Conde-Agudelo, A., Romero, R., Nicolaides, K., Chaiworapongsa, T., O’Brien, J.M., Cetingoz, E., et al. (2013) Vaginal Progesterone vs. Cervical Cerclage for the Pre-vention of Preterm Birth in Women with a Sonographic Short Cervix, Previous Preterm Birth, and Singleton Gestation: A Systematic Review and Indirect Comparison Meta Analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 208, 42.e1-42.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Hume, H., Rebarber, A., Saltzman, D.H., Roman, A.S. and Fox, N.S. (2012) Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage: Shirodkar vs. McDonald. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medi-cine, 25, 2690-2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Gilner, J. and Biggio, J. (2016) Management of Short Cervix during Pregnancy: A Review. The American Journal of Perinatology, 33, 245-252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Orzechowski, K.M., Boelig, R., Nicholas, S.S., Baxter, J. and Berghella, V. (2015) Is Universal Cervical Length Screening Indicated in Women with Prior Term Birth? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 212, 234.E1-234.E5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Owen, J., Szychowski, J.M., Hankins, G., Iams, J.D., Sheffield, J.S., Perez-Delboy, A., et al. (2010) Does Midtrimester Cervical Length ≥25 mm Predict Preterm Birth in High-Risk Women? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 203, 393.E1-393.E5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]