长江流域固碳服务流动路径量化及驱动因子分析
Quantification and Driving Factors of Carbon Sequestration Service Flow Paths
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2022.125066, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 百晓莹, 向洪莉, 王 昕, 王燕雯, 刘建晓, 官冬杰:重庆交通大学智慧城市学院,重庆;周李磊*:重庆交通大学土木工程学院,重庆
关键词: 固碳服务供需平衡服务流长江流域Carbon Sequestration Service Balance between Supply and Demand Service Flow The Yangtze River Basin
摘要: 量化生态系统固碳服务的供给、需求及固碳服务流动路径,探索服务流驱动因子,以期为区域碳的空间格局管理提供依据。以长江流域为研究区,采用多源数据融合、InVEST模型、流动比率的方法、引入主风向的概念,研究长江流域固碳服务供给量与需求量的平衡关系,分析固碳服务空间流动的人为和自然驱动因子。结果表明:长江流域2015年、2020年碳固定量分别为248.7 t/hm2、249.1 t/hm2,主要的碳需求区为林地生态系统;碳排放量分别为21.7 t/hm2、22.6 t/hm2,建设用地是主要的碳供给区域。区域总体上碳需求值大于碳供给值。2) 2015、2020年长江流域上、中、下游固碳服务供需比分别为0.09、0.089、0.136和0.09、0.09、0.138,各省市固碳服务碳需求碳供给比率均小于1。3) 2015年,福建省碳服务流流量最大,为2370 t/km2;青海省碳服务流流量最小,为1523 t/km2;2020年,广西壮族自治区碳服务流流量最大,为2710 t/km2;青海省碳服务流流量最小,为1628 t/km2。4) 人口与土地利用因子是碳排放最主要的正向驱动因子,维持碳的供给。气候和降水对研究区的碳排放起负作用。长江流域2015年、2020年区域总体上碳汇值大于碳源值,依次由长江流域的上游、中游到下游区域,碳需求区域逐渐变大。未来长江流域低碳发展的实现需要加强上游碳需求区域保护,平衡中、下游固碳服务供需平衡。
Abstract: To quantify the supply and demand of ecosystem carbon sequestration services and the flow paths of carbon sequestration services, and to explore the service flow drivers, with a view to providing a basis for the management of regional carbon spatial pattern. Taking the Yangtze River basin as the study area, we adopt the methods of multi-source data fusion, the InVEST model, flow ratio, and introduce the concept of main wind direction to study the equilibrium relationship between the supply and demand of carbon sequestration services in the Yangtze River basin, and analyze the anthropogenic and natural drivers of the spatial flow of carbon sequestration services. The results showed that: 1) The carbon fixtion of the Yangtze River Basin in 2015 and 2020 was 248.7 t/hm2 and 249.1 t/hm2, respectively, and the main carbon demand region was woodland ecosystem. Carbon emissions were 21.7 t/hm2 and 22.6 t/hm2, respectively. Construction land was the main carbon source region. On the whole, the carbon demand value is greater than the carbon supply value. 2) In 2015 and 2020, the supply-demand ratio of carbon sequestration services in the upper, middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin was 0.09, 0.089, 0.136, and 0.09, 0.09, 0.138, respectively. The ratio of carbon sequestration services to carbon sources in each province was less than 1. 3) In 2015, Fujian province had the largest carbon service flow, which was 2370 t/km2; Qinghai province has the lowest carbon service flow, which is 1523 t/km2. In 2020, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region has the largest carbon service flow, which is 2710 t/km2. Qinghai province has the lowest carbon service flow, which is 1628 t/km2. 4) Population and land use factors are the most important positive drivers of carbon emissions, maintaining carbon supply. Climate and precipitation have negative effects on carbon emission in the study area. The carbon sink value of the Yangtze River Basin in 2015 and 2020 was larger than the carbon source value, and the carbon demand area gradually increased from the upper, middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin. In order to achieve low-carbon development in the Yangtze River basin in the future, it is necessary to strengthen the protection of the upstream carbon demand area and balance the supply and demand of carbon sequestration services in the middle and downstream.
文章引用:百晓莹, 向洪莉, 王昕, 王燕雯, 刘建晓, 周李磊, 官冬杰. 长江流域固碳服务流动路径量化及驱动因子分析[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2022, 12(5): 654-667. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2022.125066

参考文献

[1] 杨丽雯, 董丽青, 张立伟, 等. 固碳服务供需平衡和服务流量化评估——以引黄入晋南干线为例[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(3): 557-571.
[2] 张丽峰, 刘思萌. 碳中和目标下京津冀地区碳排放影响因素研究——基于分位数回归和VAR模型的实证分析[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2021, 37(9): 1025-1031.
[3] 王志民, 张新林, 邱小樱. 基于碳中和的旅游景区净碳排放估算与低碳景区建设——以镇江“焦山”风景区为例[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版), 2016, 39(4): 107-113.
[4] 蒋金亮, 徐建刚, 吴文佳, 等. 中国人-地碳供给汇系统空间格局演变及其特征分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(5): 757-768.
[5] Vrebos, D., Staes, J., Vandenbroucke, T., et al. (2015) Mapping Ecosystem Service Flows with Land Covers Coring Maps for Data-Scarce Regions. Ecosystem Services, 13, 28-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 李婷, 李晶, 王彦泽, 等. 关中-天水经济区生态系统固碳服务空间流动及格局优化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(20): 3953-3969.
[7] 年蔚, 陈艳梅, 高吉喜, 等. 京津冀固碳释氧生态服务供-受关系分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(9): 783-791.
[8] 孟士婷, 黄庆旭, 何春阳, 等. 区域碳固持服务供需关系动态分析——以北京为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(7): 1191-1203.
[9] 杨洁, 谢保鹏, 张德罡. 基于InVEST和CA-Markov模型的黄河流域碳储量时空变化研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(6): 1018-1029.
[10] 何云玲, 吴志杰, 徐蕊. 昆明市碳供给碳汇结构变化及其驱动因子研究[J]. 云南地理环境研究, 2013, 25(6): 14-21.
[11] 陆威. 川中丘陵不同土地利用方式下土壤呼吸研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 成都: 四川师范大学, 2017.
[12] 王小国, 朱波, 王艳强, 等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤呼吸及其温度敏感性[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(5): 1960-1968.
[13] 鲍莹, 张安明. 重庆合川区土地利用碳排放的效应及驱动因素[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(2): 440-444.
[14] 张勇, 张乐勤, 汪应宏, 等. 安徽省池州市土地利用碳排放演变及其影响因素[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2014, 19(2): 216-223.
[15] Villamagna, A.M., Angermeier, P.L. and Bennett, E.M. (2013) Capacity, Pressure, Demand, and Flow: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Ecosystem Service Provision and Delivery. Ecological Complexity, 15, 114-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef