论“毒树之果”——重复性供述

On “Fruit of Poisonous Tree”—Repeated Confession

摘要: 我国的证据制度建设在不断完善的路上，尤其是对于刑事证据的相关规定中列入了对于非法证据排除的相关规定。但司法实践中，在追求和保障程序正义的同时，必然付出更大的经济代价，也有“钻空子”的存在。在毒树之果立法态度不明朗的情况下，我国仅就重复性论述进行了规制，但当前否定“重复性供述”立法态度下，仍旧呈现出“重复性供述”的“诱因”存在过于狭窄之疑、两次排除性规定难防极左极右的规避行为的现实困境。简单的列举极易导致两条例外规定被有心之人滥用，同时实践情况的复杂性使得法律难以言尽，因此，“裁量排除”在重复性供述中具有其适用空间。

Abstract: China’s evidence system construction is on the road of continuous improvement, especially the rel-evant provisions on the exclusion of illegal evidence are included in the relevant provisions on criminal evidence. However, in judicial practice, while pursuing and guaranteeing procedural jus-tice, it is bound to pay a greater economic price, and there are also “loopholes”. Under the circum-stance that the legislative attitude of the fruit of the poisonous tree is not clear, China only regulates repetitive statements, but under the current legislative attitude of denying “repetitive confessions”, it still shows that the “incentives” of “repetitive confessions” are too narrow. It is difficult to prevent the practical dilemma of the extreme left and right evasion behavior. Simple enumeration can easi-ly lead to the two exceptions being abused by people with intentions. At the same time, the com-plexity of the practical situation makes it difficult to describe the law. Therefore, “discretionary ex-clusion” has its application space in repeated confessions.