我国高等教育规模扩张政策对城乡教育公平影响研究——基于CGSS2017数据的分析
Research on the Impact of China’s Higher Education Scale Expansion Policy on Urban and Rural Education Equity—Analysis Based on CGSS2017 Data
摘要: 文章基于教育政策评估视角,通过2017年度中国综合社会调查(CGSS)数据分析的实证研究,以前后比较的教育政策评估方法,研究了高等教育规模扩张政策对城乡之间大学入学机会分布的新变化。结果表明,中国高等院校入学机会在城乡分配中的不平等现状依然存在,但教育扩张政策落实后,中国高等教育机会分配的城乡差异已明显减少;城市高等教育机遇不公平程度降低更多地体现在总量的变化,但在普通高校中,城市大学机会的不平等并没有明显的变化。在此基础上,通过对我国城市高等教育扩展政策实施效果的评价,为今后制定更有针对性的城市高等教育扩张政策提供依据。
Abstract: Based on the perspective of education policy evaluation, this paper studies the effect of higher edu-cation scale expansion policy on the distribution of university enrollment opportunities between urban and rural areas through an empirical study of data analysis of the 2017 China General Social Survey (CGSS) and a comparison of education policy evaluation methods before and after. new changes. The results show that the unequal status quo of China’s higher education opportunity dis-tribution in urban and rural distribution still exists, but after the implementation of the education expansion policy, the urban-rural difference in China’s higher education opportunity distribution has been significantly reduced; the degree of inequality in urban higher education opportunities has decreased more. It is reflected in the change of the total amount, but in ordinary colleges and universities, the inequality of urban university opportunities has not changed significantly. On this basis, the evaluation of the implementation effect of my country’s urban higher education expan-sion policy provides a basis for formulating more targeted urban higher education expansion poli-cies in the future.
文章引用:任慧颖. 我国高等教育规模扩张政策对城乡教育公平影响研究——基于CGSS2017数据的分析[J]. 应用数学进展, 2022, 11(5): 3125-3133. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2022.115332

参考文献

[1] 陈爱丽, 郑逸芳, 许佳贤. 教育能促进社会阶层代际流动吗?——基于中国综合社会调查(CGSS)的经验证据[J]. 教育与经济, 2019, 35(6): 27-34.
[2] 陆学艺. 当代中国社会阶层的分化与流动[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2003(4): 1-9.
[3] 朱志玲. 影响教育机会公平感的宏观结构因素及其十年变迁——基于CGSS2005与CGSS2015的比较[J]. 当代教育科学, 2021(4): 54-64.
[4] 杨飒. 2020年全国教育事业统计主要结果发布[N]. 光明日报, 2021-03-02(011).
[5] Raftery, A.E. and Hout, M. (1993) Maximally Maintained Inequality: Expansion, Reform, and Opportunity in Irish Education 1921-75. Sociology of Education, 66, 41-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Lucas, S.R. (2001) Effectively Maintained Inequality: Education Transitions, Track Mobility, and Social Background Effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1642-1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 刘精明. 中国基础教育领域中的机会不平等及其变化[J]. 中国社会科学, 2008(5): 101-116+206-207.
[8] Ballarino, G., Bernardi, F., Requena, M. and Schadee, H. (2009) Persistent Inequali-ties? Expansion of Education and Class Inequality in Italy and Spain. European Sociological Review, 25, 123-138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Paul Vogt, W. (1995) Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attain-ment in Thirteen Countries. Comparative Education Review, 39, 239-240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Jennings, M.K. (1968) The American Occupational Structure. American Polit-ical Science Review, 62, 596-597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Lenski, G.E. (1966) Power and Privilege. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[12] 杜桂英. 家庭背景对我国高等教育入学机会的影响——基于2009年高校毕业生的调研报告[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2010(10): 78-84+5.
[13] 沈艳, 张恺. 家庭背景对我国高等教育入学机会的影响——基于2013届高校毕业生调查的实证分析[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2015(5): 30-36.
[14] 刘精明. 高等教育扩展与入学机会差异: 1978-2003 [J]. 社会杂志, 2006, 26(3): 158-179+209.
[15] 吴晓刚. 中国当代的高等教育、精英形成与社会分层来自“首都大学生成长追踪调查”的初步发现[J]. 社会杂志, 2016, 36(3): 1-31.
[16] 刘复兴, 邢海燕. 论教育政策执行评估中的公众参与问题[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(3): 54-61+205-206.