猕猴桃溃疡病菌侵染过程中鞭毛基因的转录组表达分析
Transcriptome Expression Analysis of Flagella Gene during Infection of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae
DOI: 10.12677/BP.2022.122012, PDF,   
作者: 吴莲莲:贵州大学农学院,贵阳 贵州;黄 露, 安星宇, 吴石平*:贵州省农业科学院植物保护研究所,贵阳 贵州
关键词: 猕猴桃溃疡病菌转录组鞭毛基因 Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae Transcriptome Flagella Gene
摘要: 为了发掘猕猴桃溃疡病菌的致病相关基因,利用(RNA sequencing, RNA-Seq)技术对接菌不同时间点的猕猴桃与溃疡病菌进行互作转录组测序分析。结果表明:共获得101.01 Gb Clean Data,各样品Clean Data均达到4.85 Gb以上,Q30碱基百分比在96.77%以上。其中与鞭毛相关并表达的差异基因有31个。鞭毛相关差异表达基因GO注释表明参与细胞过程的基因数目最多,细胞组分和分子功能次之;鞭毛相关差异表达基因KEGG通路分析表明差异基因的注释以细胞运动为主。经qRT-PCR检测表明,5个随机选择的差异表达基因表达量变化与转录组测序结果基本一致。本研究结果对猕猴桃溃疡病致病基因发掘具有重要的理论指导和实践意义。
Abstract: In order to explore the pathogenic genes of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiaer, use (RNA sequencing, RNA-Seq) transcriptome sequencing analysis of interaction between kiwifruit and Psa at different time points of technology docking bacteria. The results show that: a total of 101.01 Gb of clean data were obtained, the clean data of each sample reached more than 4.85 Gb, and the base percentage of Q30 was more than 96.77%. Among them, there are 31 differentially expressed genes related to flagella. GO annotation of flagella-related differentially expressed genes showed that the number of genes involved in cell process was the largest, followed by cell components and molecular functions. KEGG pathway analysis of flagella-related differentially expressed genes showed that the enrichment of differential genes was mainly cell movement. qRT-PCR showed that the expression changes of five randomly selected differentially expressed genes were consistent with the transcriptome sequencing results. The results of this study have important theoretical guidance and practical significance for discovering the pathogenic genes of kiwifruit canker.
文章引用:吴莲莲, 黄露, 安星宇, 吴石平. 猕猴桃溃疡病菌侵染过程中鞭毛基因的转录组表达分析[J]. 生物过程, 2022, 12(2): 106-115. https://doi.org/10.12677/BP.2022.122012

参考文献

[1] 李黎, 钟彩虹, 李大卫, 等. 猕猴桃细菌性溃疡病的研究进展[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2013, 32(5): 124-133.
[2] 黄其玲, 高小宁, 赵志博, 等. GFPuv标记猕猴桃溃疡病菌的生物学特性及其在土壤根系中的定殖[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(2): 282-291.
[3] Bartoli, C., Lamichhane, J.R., Berge, O., et al. (2015) A Framework to Gauge the Ep-idemic Potential of Plant Pathogens in Environmental Reservoirs: The Example of Kiwifruit Canker. Molecular Plant Pathology, 16, 137-149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Dharmaraj, K., Cui, W., Rikkerink, E., et al. (2019) Construction of a Ki-wifruit Yeast Two-Hybrid cDNA Library to Identify Host Targets of the Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae Effector AvrPto5. BMC Research Notes, 12, Article No. 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Donati, L., Cellini, A., Sangiorgio, D., et al. (2020) Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae: Ecology, Infection Dynamics and Disease Epidemiology. Microbial Ecology, 80, 81-102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Wicaksono, W.A., Jones, E.E., Casonato, S., et al. (2017) Biological Control of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa), the Causal Agent of Bacterial Canker of Kiwifruit, Using Endophytic Bacteria Recovered from a Medicinal Plant. Biological Control, 116, 103-112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Tontou, R., Gaggia, F., Baffoni, L., et al. (2016) Molecular Characterization of an Endophyte Showing a Strong Antagonistic Activity against Pseudomonas sy-ringae pv. actinidiae. Plant & Soil, 405, 97-106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Di, L.G., Evangelisti, M., Mancuso, F., et al. (2015) Isolation and Partial Characterization of Bacteriophages Infecting Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae, Causal Agent of Kiwifruit Bacterial Canker. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 54, 1210-1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Frampton, R.A., Taylor, C., Holguin Moreno, A.V., et al. (2014) Identification of Bacteriophages for Biocontrol of the Kiwifruit Canker Phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. acti-nidiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 80, 2216-2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Zhang, T., Jiang, Y., Huang, J. and Dong, W. (2013) Isolation and Identification of the Causal Pathogens for Kiwifruit Bacterial Canker and the Isolation of the Antagonistic Endophytic Fungi from Kiwifruit in Sichuan, China. Journal of Agricultural Science, 5, 2415-2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 魏海娟, 刘萍, 杨燕, 吴云锋. 多羟基双萘醛提取物对猕猴桃溃疡病菌的抑制作用[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(1): 126-130+136.
[12] 张爱萍, 张晓晓, 吴林娜, 等. 西瓜噬酸菌趋化性及鞭毛素基因ΔcheAΔfliC双突变体构建及功能[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2017, 25(11): 1838-1850.
[13] Zhang, Y., Chao, W., Jiang, W., et al. (2013) The HD-GYP Domain Protein RpfG of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola Regulates Synthesis of Extracellular Polysaccharides That Contribute to Biofilm Formation and Vir-ulence on Rice. PLoS ONE, 8, e59428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Gao, M., Niu, J., Zhao, S.P., et al. (2012) Characterization of Erysiphe Necator Responsive Genes in Chinese Wild Vitis quinquangularis. Inter-national Journal of Molecular Sciences, 13, 11497-11519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 井赵斌. 猕猴桃抗溃疡病转录组分析和基因功能注释[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(6): 1830-1838.
[16] Schmittgen, T.D. and Livak, K.J. (2008) Analyzing Real-Time PCR Data by the Comparative CT Method. Nature Protocols, 3, 1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Ke, X.W., Yin, Z.Y., et al. (2014) Transcriptome Profiling to Identify Genes Involved in Pathogenicity of Valsa mali on Apple Tree. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 68, 31-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Saminathan, T., Bodunrin, A., Singh, N.V., et al. (2016) Genome-Wide Identification of MicroRNAs in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) by High-Throughput Sequencing. BMC Plant Biology, 16, Article No. 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]