肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞及肿瘤细胞EGFR蛋白表达在三阴性乳腺癌患者中的预后价值
Prognostic Value of Tumor Infiltrating-Lymphocytes and EGFR Protein Expression of Tumor Cell in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
摘要: 与Luminal型乳腺癌、人类表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2) (+)乳腺癌相比,三阴性乳腺癌(Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, TNBC)缺乏靶向治疗的特异性靶点,具有生物学侵袭性、复发转移风险高、生存期较短等特点。目的:评估肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(Tumor Infiltrating-Lymphocytes, TILs)与表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)表达的预后价值,并确定它们与TNBC的临床病理参数之间的关系。材料与方法:收集2010年1月至2015年12月共计70例于青岛大学附属医院接受手术治疗的、有病理报告和临床资料完整的TNBC患者。评估手术标本中TILs比例,并分为高比例(TILs ≥ 40%,n = 28)和低比例(TILs < 40%,n = 42) 2组。免疫组化检测ER、PR、HER2和EGFR的表达,评估EGFR表达情况,并将其分为强阳性组(EGFR ≥ 50%,n = 10)和非强阳性组(EGFR < 50%,n = 60)。评估TILs比例和EGFR表达对预后的影响。结果:TILs低比例组中位无病生存期(DFS) 55.5个月,TILs高比例组97个月,两组比较p = 0.059;TILs低比例组中位总生存期(OS) 69.5个月,高比例组97个月,p = 0.084。EGFR非强阳性组,低比例TILs (TILs < 40%, n = 25)中位DFS和OS分别为24个月和36个月,高比例TILs (TILs ≥ 40%, n = 35)中位DFS和OS均为96个月,不同TILs比例组之间DFS (p = 0.035)和OS (p = 0.048)具有统计学显著性差异;EGFR强阳性组,低比例TILs (TILs < 40%, n = 7)中位DFS和OS均为98个月,高比例TILs (TILs ≥ 40%, n = 3)中位DFS和OS均为94个月(p = 0.513和p = 0.882)。结论:不同TILs比例三阴性乳腺癌患者治疗后DFS和OS差别无统计学显著性。EGFR非强阳性的TNBC患者,TILs比例越高、术后DFS和OS均越长。
Abstract: Compared with Luminal breast cancer and HER2 (+) breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks specific targets for targeted therapy, and is characterized by biological invasions, high risk of recurrence and metastasis, and short survival. Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of tumor infiltrating-lymphocytes (TILs) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, and to determine their relationship with clinicopathological parameters of TNBC. Materials and Methods: 70 TNBC patients with complete pathological reports and clinical data between January 2010 to December 2015 in Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University were selected. TILs proportions in sur-gical specimens were assessed and divided into high (TILs ≥ 40%, n = 28) and low groups (TILs < 40%, n = 42). The expression of ER, PR, HER2 and EGFR were detected by immunohistochemistry. EGFR expression was evaluated and divided into strongly positive group (EGFR ≥ 50%, n = 10) and non-strongly positive group (EGFR < 50%, n = 60). The effect of TILs ratio and EGFR expression on prognosis was evaluated. Results: Median disease-free survival (DFS) and total survival (OS) were 55.5 and 69.5 months, respectively, in the low-proportion TILs group, and both of them were 97 months in the high-proportion TILs group. There were no statistically significant differences in DFS (p = 0.059) and OS (p = 0.084) in different TILs proportion groups. In EGFR non-strongly positive group, median DFS and OS were 24 and 36 months, respectively, in the low-proportion TILs group (TILs < 40%, n = 25). Median DFS and OS were 96 months in the high-proportion TILs group (TILs ≥ 40%, n = 35). There were statistically significant differences in DFS (p = 0.035) and OS (p = 0.048) in different TILs proportion groups. In EGFR positive group, median DFS and OS were 98 months in the low-proportion TILs group (TILs < 40%, n = 7), and median DFS and OS were 94 months in the high-proportion TILs (TILs ≥ 40%, n = 3) (p = 0.513 and p = 0.882). Conclusion: TILs ratio and EGFR expression had no significant effect on post operative DFS and OS in patients with triple negative breast cancer. In TNBC patients without strong EGFR, the higher the proportion of TILs, the longer the postoperative DFS and OS.
文章引用:张丹丹, 赵静, 曾满芹, 孟婷, 董娴宁, 付广明, 魏志敏. 肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞及肿瘤细胞EGFR蛋白表达在三阴性乳腺癌患者中的预后价值[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(6): 5331-5342. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2022.126773

参考文献

[1] Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Fuchs, H.E. and Jemal, A. (2021) Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clini-cians, 71, 7-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Medina, M.A., Oza, G., Sharma, A., et al. (2020) Tri-ple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of Conventional and Advanced Therapeutic Strategies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, Article No. 2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Al-Mahmood, S., Sapiezynski, J., Garbuzenko, O.B. and Minko, T. (2018) Metastatic and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Challenges and Treatment Options. Drug Delivery and Transla-tional Research, 8, 1483-1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Kim, A., Jang, M.H., Lee, S.J. and Bae, Y.K. (2017) Mutations of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Journal of Breast Cancer, 20, 150-159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Krishnamurti, U., Wetherilt, C.S., Yang, J., et al. (2017) Tu-mor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Are Significantly Associated with Better Overall Survival and Disease-Free Survival in Triple-Negative but Not Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers. Human Pathology, 64, 7-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] El Bairi, K., Haynes, H.R., Blackley, E., et al. (2021) The Tale of TILs in Breast Cancer: A Report from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group. npj Breast Cancer, 7, 150.
[7] Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., Huang, K.H., et al. (2019) EGFR-Specific CAR-T Cells Trigger Cell Lysis in EGFR-Positive TNBC. Aging, 11, 11054-11072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Zhang, L., Liu, F.F., Fu, L., et al. (2016) Significance and Evaluation of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer. Chinese Journal of Pathology, 45, 282-284.
[9] AiErken, N., Shi, H.J., Zhou, Y., Shao, N., Zhang, J., Shi, Y., et al. (2017) High PD-L1 Expression Is Closely Associated with Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Leads to Good Clinical Outcomes in Chinese Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 13, 1172-1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Leon-Ferre, R.A., Polley, M.Y., Liu, H., Gilbert, J.A., Cafourek, V., Hill-man, D.W., et al. (2018) Impact of Histopathology, Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Prognosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 167, 89-99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Byun, K.D., Hwang, H.J., Park, K.J., Kim, M.C., Cho, S.H., Ju, M.H., et al. (2018) T-Cell Immunoglobulin Mucin 3 Expression on Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes as a Positive Prog-nosticator in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Journal of Breast Cancer, 21, 406-414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Aboushousha, T., Hammam, O., Safwat, G., et al. (2018) Differential Expression of RAGE, EGFR and Ki-67 in Primary Tumors and Lymph Node Deposits of Breast Carcinoma. Asian Pa-cific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 19, 2269-2277.
[13] Dass, S.A., Tan, K.L., SelvaRajan, R., et al. (2021) Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of Present and Future Diagnostic Modalities. Medicina, 57, Article No. 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] O’Meara, T., Safonov, A., Casadevall, D., et al. (2019) Immune Microenvironment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in African-American and Caucasian Women. Breast Cancer Re-search and Treatment, 175, 247-259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Denkert, C., Minckwitz, G., Brasen, J.A., et al. (2015) Tu-mor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with or without Carboplatin in Human Epi-dermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive and Triple Negative Primary Breast Cancers. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33, 983-991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] García-Teijido, P., Cabal, M.L., Fernández, I.P., et al. (2016) Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: The Future of Immune Targeting. Clnical Medicine Insights: Oncology, 10, 31-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Loi, S., Sirtaine, N., Piette, F., et al. (2013) Prognostic and Predictive Value of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in a Phase III Randomized Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trial in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Comparing the Addition of Docetaxel to Doxorubicin with Doxorubicin-Based Chemotherapy: BIG 02-98. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31, 860-867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Adams, S., Gray, R.J., Demaria, S., et al. (2014) Prognostic Value of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocites in Triple Negative Breast Cancers from Two Phase III Randomized Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trials: ECOG 2197 and ECOG 1199. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32, 2959-2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Cheng, L., Alexander, R.E., Maclennan, G.T., et al. (2012) Mo-lecular Pathology of Lung Cancer: Key to Personalized Medicine. Modern Pathology, 25, 347-369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Nakai, K., Hung, M.C. and Yamaguchi, H. (2016) A Perspective on Anti-EGFR Therapies Targeting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. American Journal of Cancer Research, 6, 1609-1623.
[21] Park, H.S., Jang, M.H., Kim, E.J., et al. (2014) High EGFR Gene Copy Number Predicts Poor Out-come in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Modern Pathology, 27, 1212-1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Teng, Y.H., Tan, W.J., Thike, A.A., et al. (2011) Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Gene in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Possible Implications for Tar-geted Therapy. Breast Cancer Research, 13, Article No. R35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Li, Z., Qiu, Y., Lu, W., et al. (2018) Immunotherapeutic Interventions of Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Journal of Translational Medi-cine, 16, Article No. 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Jiang, Y.Z., Ma, D., Suo, C., et al. (2019) Genomic and Transcriptomic Landscape of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Subtypes and Treatment Strategies. Cancer Cell, 35, 428-440.E5.
[25] Wang, L., Lang, G.T., Xue, M.Z., et al. (2020) Dissecting the Heterogeneity of the Alternative Polyadenylation Profiles in Triple-Negative Breast Cancers. Theranostics, 10, 10531-10547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]