《历史与阶级意识》中的物化意识与马克思异化思想的差异

The Difference between the Materialized Consciousness in History and Class Consciousness and Marx’s Thought of Alienation

摘要: 马克思在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中超越了黑格尔和费尔巴哈创造性地提出了异化劳动学说。卢卡奇在《历史与阶级意识》中揭露了物化意识的现象，尽管这与异化存在相似之处，但二者在定义上以及所主张的克服途径上都有着明显区别。以《历史与阶级意识》为研究文本，对卢卡奇物化理论与马克思异化思想的差异展开研究，以期为解决当前资本主义社会的意识控制与异化问题提供一定的理论参考。

Abstract: Marx creatively put forward the alienated labor theory beyond Hegel and Feuerbach in the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. In “History and Class Consciousness”, Lukacs exposed the phenomenon of materialized consciousness, and although there are similarities with alienation, the two are clearly different in definition and the way they propose to overcome. Taking “History and Class Consciousness” as the research text, this paper studies the difference between Lukacs’ theory of materialization and Marx’s alienation thought, in order to provide some theoretical reference for solving the problems of consciousness control and alienation in the current capitalist society.