提取练习对错误记忆影响的研究综述
A Review of the Retrieval Practice Effect on False Memory
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2022.116321, PDF,   
作者: 王浩钰:福建师范大学心理学院,福建 福州
关键词: 提取练习错误记忆RES效应Retrieval Practice False Memory RES Effect
摘要: 当接触到具有误导倾向的信息时,人们的记忆有可能产生扭曲甚至发生错误产生错误记忆。许多研究者致力于寻找提高记忆准确性或降低其暗示性的方法。测试或提取练习可能是一种可行的方法。测试效应指的是,在同等的时间内多次重复测试或提取练习比多次重复学习更能促进记忆的长期保持。已有研究表明测试效应在教学实践和学生学习中的有效性。本文总结了关于提取练习对错误记忆影响的研究。主要关注RES效应的产生与其理论机制,总结和分析了错误记忆产生的可能原因与解释,最后概述了进一步的研究方向。
Abstract: When exposed to information that has a tendency to mislead, people’s memories may become distorted or even erroneous producing false memories. Many researchers have worked to find ways to improve the accuracy of memory or reduce its suggestibility. Testing or retrieval may be one possible method. Testing effect refers to the fact that multiple repetitions of a test or retrieval practice over the same amount of time promote better long-term retention of memory than multiple repetitions of learning. Studies have been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the testing effect in teaching practice and student learning. This paper summarizes the research on the effects of extraction practice on false memory. It focuses on the generation of the RES effect and its theoretical mechanisms, summarizes and analyzes the possible causes and explanations for false memory generation, and concludes by outlining further research directions.
文章引用:王浩钰. 提取练习对错误记忆影响的研究综述[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2022, 11(6): 2339-2343. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2022.116321

参考文献

[1] Melnyk, L. and Bruck, M. (2004) Timing Moderates the Effects of Repeated Suggestive Interviewing on Children’s Eyewitness Memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 613-631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Karpicke, J.D., Blunt, J.R. and Smith, M.A. (2016) Retrieval-Based Learning: Positive Effects of Retrieval Practice in Elementary School Children. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article No. 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Roediger III, H.L. and Karpicke, J.D. (2006) The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 1, 181-210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Karpicke, J.D. and Roediger III, H.L. (2008) The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning. Science, 319, 966-968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Carpenter, S.K. (2009) Cue Strength as a Moderator of the Testing Effect: The Benefits of Elaborative Retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 35, 1563-1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Loftus, E.F. and Hoffman, H.G. (1989) Misinformation and Memory: The Creation of new Memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 118, 100-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Mcnally, R.J., Lasko, N.B., Clancy, S.A., et al. (2004) Psychophysiological Responding during Script-Driven Imagery in People Reporting Abduction by Space Aliens. Psychological Science, 15, 493-497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Kent, M.J. (2011) Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong. Law Library Journal, 103, 481-482.
[9] Loftus, E.F. (1977) Shifting Human Color Memory. Memory & Cognition, 5, 696-699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Memon, A., Zaragoza, M., Clifford, B.R., et al. (2010) Inoculation or Antidote? The Effects of Cognitive Interview Timing on False Memory for Forcibly Fabricated Events. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 105-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R.P., et al. (2012) Protecting against Misleading Post-Event Information with a Self- Administered Interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 568-575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Pansky, A. and Tenenboim, E. (2011) Inoculating against Eyewitness Suggestibility via Interpolated Verbatim vs. Gist Testing. Memory & Cognition, 39, 155-170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Pereverseff, R.S., Bodner, G.E. and Huff, M.J. (2020) Protective Effects of Testing across Misinformation Formats in the Household Scene Paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 425-441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Chan, J.C.K., Thomas, A.K. and Bulevich, J.B. (2009) Recalling a Witnessed Event Increases Eyewitness Suggestibility: The Reversed Testing Effect. Psychological Science, 20, 66-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Chan, J.C.K. and Langley, M.M. (2011) Paradoxical Effects of Testing: Retrieval Enhances Both Accurate Recall and Suggestibility in Eyewitnesses. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 37, 248-255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Thomas, A.K., Bulevich, J.B. and Chan, J.C.K. (2010) Testing Promotes Eyewitness Accuracy with a Warning: Implications for Retrieval Enhanced Suggestibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 149-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Gordon, L.T. and Thomas, A.K. (2014) Testing Potentiates New Learning in the Misinformation Paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 42, 186-197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Tulving, E. and Watkinsm, M.J. (1974) On Negative Transfer: Effects of Testing One List on the Recall of Another. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 181-193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Chan, J.C.K., Wilford, M.M. and Hughes, K.L. (2012) Retrieval Can Increase or Decrease Suggestibility Depending on How Memory Is Tested: The Importance of Source Complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 78-85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Hamker, C. (1986) The Effects of Adjunct Questions on Prose Learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 212-242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Lewis, M.R. and Mensink, M.C. (2012) Prereading Questions and Online Text Comprehension. Discourse Processes, 49, 367-390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Chan, J.C.K. and Lapaglia, J.A. (2013) Impairing Existing Declarative Memory in Humans by Disrupting Reconsolidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 9309-9313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Hardt, O., Einarsson, E.O. and Nader, K. (2010) A Bridge over Troubled Water: Reconsolidation as a Link between Cognitive and Neuroscientific Memory Research Traditions. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 141-167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Carpenter, S.K. (2011) Semantic Information Activated during Retrieval Contributes to Later Retention: Support for the Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis of the Testing Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1547-1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Chan, J.C.K., Mcdermott, K.B. and Roediger III, H.L. (2006) Retrieval-Induced Facilitation: Initially Nontested Material Can Benefit from Prior Testing of Related Material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 553-571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]