|
[1]
|
Aguirre, G. K., Singh, R., & D’Esposito, M. (1999). Stimulus Inversion and the Responses of Face and Object-Sensitive Cortical Areas. Neuroreport, 10, 189-194.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[2]
|
Amihai, I., Deouell, L. Y., & Bentin, S. (2011). Neural Adaptation Is Related to Face Repetition Irrespective of Identity: A Reap-praisal of the N170 Effect. Experimental Brain Research, 209, 193-204.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[3]
|
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why Faces, Are and Are Not Special: An Effect of Expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 115, 107-117.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[4]
|
Eng, Z. H. D., Yick, Y. Y., Guo, Y., Xu, H., Reiner, M., Cham, T. J., & Chen, S. H. A. (2017). 3D faces are recognized more accurately and faster than 2D faces, but with similar inversion effects. Vision Research, 138, 78-85.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[5]
|
Freiwald, W. A., & Tsao, D. Y. (2014). Neurons That Keep a Straight Face. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 7894-7895.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[6]
|
Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[7]
|
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the Middle Fusiform “Face Area” Increases with Expertise in Recognizing Novel Objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 568-573.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[8]
|
Hagen, S., Vuong, Q. C., Scott, L. S., Curran, T., & Tanaka, J. W. (2016). The Role of Spatial Frequency in Expert Object Recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 413-422.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[9]
|
Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2002). Learning Can Abolish Age Differences in Face Recognition: A Developmental ERP Study on Upright, Inverted, and Contrast-Reversed Faces. Perception, 31, 18.
|
|
[10]
|
Jacques, C., & Rossion, B. (2010). Misaligning Face Halves Increases and Delays the N170 Specifically for Upright Faces: Implications for the Nature of Early Face Representations. Brain Research, 1318, 96-109.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[11]
|
Kawakami, N., Miura, E., & Yoshida, F. (2015). Conscious and Unconscious Processes Are Sensitive to Different Types of Information. Evolution, Mind and Behaviour, 13, 37-46.[CrossRef]
|
|
[12]
|
Kerr, N. H., & Winograd, E. (1982). Effects of Contextual Elaboration on Face Recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10, 603- 609.[CrossRef]
|
|
[13]
|
Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: The Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A-Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 513-536.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[14]
|
Maurer, D., Grand, R. L., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The Many Faces of Configural Processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.[CrossRef]
|
|
[15]
|
Mazard, A., Schiltz, C., & Rossion, B. (2006). Recovery from Adaptation to Facial Identity Is Larger for Upright than Inverted Faces in the Human Occipito-Temporal Cortex. Neuropsychologia, 44, 912-922.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[16]
|
Miki, K., Honda, Y., Takeshima, Y., Watanabe, S., & Kakigi, R. (2015). Differential Age-Related Changes in N170 Responses to Upright Faces, Inverted Faces, and Eyes in Japanese Children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article No. 263.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[17]
|
Miki, K., Takeshima, Y., Watanabe, S., Honda, Y., & Kakigi, R. (2011). Effects of Inverting Contour and Features on Processing for Static and Dynamic Face Perception: An MEG Study. Brain Research, 1383, 230-241.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[18]
|
Murphy, J., Gray, K. L., & Cook, R. (2017). The Composite Face Illusion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 245-261.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[19]
|
Richler, J. J., Mack, M. L., Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2011). Inverted Faces Are (Eventually) Processed Holistically. Vision Research, 51, 333-342.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[20]
|
Sergent, J., Ohta, S., & MacDonald, B. (1992). Functional Neuroanatomy of Face and Object Processing. A Positron Emission Tomography Study. Brain, 115, 15-36.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[21]
|
Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 46, 225-245.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[22]
|
Tanaka, H. (2020). Mental Rotation of Alphabet Characters Affects the Face-Sensitive N170 Component. NeuroReport, 31, 897-901.[CrossRef]
|
|
[23]
|
Tanaka, J. W., Heptonstall, B., & Campbell, A. (2019). Part and Whole Face Representations in Immediate and Long-Term Memory. Vision Research, 164, 53-61.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[24]
|
Tanaka, J. W., Kaiser, M. D., Hagen, S., & Pierce, L. J. (2014). Losing Face: Impaired Discrimination of Featural and Configural Information in the Mouth Region of an Inverted Face. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1000-1014.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[25]
|
Tanaka, J. W., Kay, J. B., Grinnell, E., Stansfield, B., & Szechter, L. (1998). Face Recognition in Young Children: When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts. Visual Cognition, 5, 479-496.[CrossRef]
|
|
[26]
|
Yang, L. Z., Zhang, W., Shi, B., Yang, Z., Wei, Z., Gu, F. et al. (2014). Electrical Stimulation over Bilateral Occipito-Tem- poral Regions Reduces N170 in the Right Hemisphere and the Composite Face Effect. PLOS ONE, 9, Article ID: e115772.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|