可视化角膜生物力学分析仪在近视眼中的研究进展
Research Progress of Corvis ST in Myopia
DOI: 10.12677/HJO.2022.112023, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 朱娅萍：大理大学临床医学院，云南 大理；董开业, 李才锐*：大理大学第一附属医院眼科，云南 大理；刘景晨：江西中医药大学临床医学院眼科，江西 南昌
关键词: 角膜生物力学；可视化角膜生物力学分析仪；近视；Corneal Biomechanics； Corvis ST； Myopia
摘要: 可视化角膜生物力学分析仪(Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology, Corvis ST)作为眼科领域新型检查设备，可分析并得出相应的角膜生物力学参数，并且可将角膜受压形变全过程快速精确记录下来。近年来，近视人数逐年增加，且高度近视引发的一系列并发症，最终导致不可逆的视力丧失，严重影响人们的生活质量，将Corvis ST应用于近视研究中是非常有必要的。本文简要介绍角膜生物力学测量发展、Corvis ST等测量工作原理，并对其在近视眼中的应用情况进行综述，为开展相关眼科研究工作提供重要参考。
Abstract: Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST), as a new inspection equipment in the ophthalmology field, can analyze and obtain the corresponding corneal biomechanical parameters, and can quickly and accurately record the whole corneal compressive deformation process. In re-cent years, the number of myopia is increasing year by year, and a series of complications caused by high myopia eventually lead to irreversible vision loss, seriously affecting people’s quality of life, so it is very necessary to apply Corvis ST in myopia research. This paper briefly introduces the development of corneal biomechanics measurement and the working principles of Corvis ST, and summarizes the application of Corvis ST in myopia, so as to provide an important reference for relevant ophthalmic research.
文章引用：朱娅萍, 董开业, 刘景晨, 李才锐. 可视化角膜生物力学分析仪在近视眼中的研究进展[J]. 眼科学, 2022, 11(2): 157-165. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJO.2022.112023

参考文献

[1] 薛超, 向尧齐, 王雁, 等. 人眼角膜基质生物力学特性研究[J]. 眼科新进展, 2019, 39(11): 1009-1013.
[2] Ma, J., Wang, Y., Wei, P., et al. (2018) Biomechanics and Structure of the Cornea: Implications and Association with Corneal Disorders. Survey of Ophthalmology, 63, 851-861.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 慕璟玉, 王雁, 浏梦, 等. 近视的病因研究新进展[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2021, 21(10): 1746-1750.
[4] 张耀花. 飞秒激光角膜屈光手术生物力学效应研究进展[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2020, 38(6): 534-538.
[5] Ruberti, J.W., Sinha Roy, A. and Roberts, C.J. (2011) Corneal Biome-chanics and Biomaterials. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 13, 269-295.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Beshtawi, I.M., Akhtar, R., Hillarby, M.C., et al. (2013) Biomechanical Properties of Human Corneas Following Low- and High-Intensity Collagen Cross-Linking Determined with Scanning Acoustic Microscopy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 54, 5273-5280.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 代智敏, 谷浩, 莫云飞, 等. 角膜生物力学的测量及临床应用进展[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2021, 21(9): 1796-1800.
[8] 汪倩, 王琳琳, 张妍, 等. 角膜生物力学特性的测量方法研究现状[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2016, 16(10): 1840-1846.
[9] Luce, D.A. (2005) Determining in Vivo Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea with an Ocular Response Analyzer. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 31, 156-162.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Zimmermann, M., Pitz, S., Schmidtmann, I., et al. (2017) Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. PLOS ONE, 12, e0169438.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Sullivan-Mee, M., Billingsley, S.C., Patel, A.D., et al. (2008) Ocular Response Analyzer in Subjects with and without Glaucoma. Optometry and Vision Science, 85, 463-470.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Okafor, K.C. and Brandt, J.D. (2015) Meas-uring Intraocular Pressure. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 26, 103-109.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Carbonaro, F., Hysi, P.G., Fahy, S.J., et al. (2014) Optic Disc Planimetry, Corneal Hysteresis, Central Corneal Thickness, and Intraocular Pressure as Risk Factors for Glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 157, 441-446.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Terai, N., Raiskup, F., Haustein, M., et al. (2012) Identification of Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea: The Ocular Response Analyzer. Current Eye Research, 37, 553-562.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Mcmonnies, C.W. (2012) Assessing Corneal Hysteresis Using the Ocular Response Analyzer. Optometry and Vision Science, 89, E343-E349.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Tejwani, S., Shetty, R., Kurien, M., et al. (2014) Bio-mechanics of the Cornea Evaluated by Spectral Analysis of Waveforms from Ocular Response Analyzer and Cor-vis-ST. PLOS ONE, 9, e97591.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Huseynova, T., Waring, G.O.T., Roberts, C., et al. (2014) Corneal Biomechanics as a Function of Intraocular Pressure and Pachymetry by Dynamic Infrared Signal and Scheimpflug Imaging Analysis in Normal Eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 157, 885-893.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Hon, Y. and Lam, A.K. (2013) Corneal Deformation Meas-urement Using Scheimpflug Noncontact Tonometry. Optometry and Vision Science, 90, e1-e8.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Tian, L., Wang, D., Wu, Y., et al. (2016) Corneal Bio-mechanical Characteristics Measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug Technology in Eyes with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Normal Eyes. Acta Ophthalmologica, 94, e317-e324.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Kenia, V.P., Kenia, R.V. and Pirdankar, O.H. (2020) Association be-tween Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Myopic Refractive Errors in Young Indian Individuals. Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology, 10, 45-53.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Lee, H., Roberts, C.J., Kim, T.I., et al. (2017) Changes in Biome-chanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure and Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters before and after Transepithe-lial Photorefractive Keratectomy and Femtosecond Laser-As- sisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 43, 1495-1503.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Yang, K., Xu, L., Fan, Q., et al. (2019) Repeatability and Comparison of New Corvis ST Parameters in Normal and Keratoconus Eyes. Scientific Reports, 9, Article No. 15379.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 任胜卫, 杨凯丽, 徐丽妍, 等. Corvis ST测量近视患者新型角膜生物力学参数的重复性及其影响因素[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2019(12): 990-994.
[24] Nakao, Y., Kiuchi, Y. and Okumichi, H. (2020) Evaluation of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Using Corvis ST and Comparison of the Corvis ST, Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Patients with Glaucoma. PLOS ONE, 15, e0238395.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Guo, L.L., Tian, L., Cao, K., et al. (2021) Comparison of the Morphological and Biomechanical Characteristics of Keratoconus, Forme Fruste Keratoconus, and Normal Corneas. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 36, 671-678.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Hassan, Z., Modis, L., Szalai, E., et al. (2014) Examina-tion of Ocular Biomechanics with a New Scheimpflug Technology after Corneal Refractive Surgery. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, 37, 337-341.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Lee, R., Chang, R.T., Wong, I.Y., et al. (2016) Assessment of Corneal Biomechanical Parameters in Myopes and Emmetropes Using the Corvis ST. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 99, 157-162.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] 吴雪琴, 黄芳铭. 儿童青少年如何科学防控近视[N]. 中国食品报, 2021-10-13(003).
[29] Holden, B.A., Fricke, T.R., Wilson, D.A., et al. (2016) Global Prev-alence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology, 123, 1036-1042.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Dong, L., Kang, Y.K., Li, Y., et al. (2020) Prevalence and Time Trends of Myopia in Children and Adolescents in China: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Retina, 40, 399-411.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[31] Tseng, G.L. and Chen, C.Y. (2016) Evaluation of High Myopia Complications Prevention Program in University Freshmen. Medicine (Baltimore), 95, e5093.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] Wu, P.C., Huang, H.M., Yu, H.J., et al. (2016) Epide-miology of Myopia. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology (Phila), 5, 386-393.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Haarman, A.E.G., Enthoven, C.A., Tideman, J.W.L., et al. (2020) The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 61, 49.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Sefat, S.M., Wiltfang, R., Bechmann, M., et al. (2016) Evaluation of Changes in Human Corneas after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Non-Contact Tonometry and Ultra- High-Speed Camera (Corvis ST). Current Eye Re-search, 41, 917-922.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Bueno-Gimeno, I., Espana-Gregori, E., Gene-Sampedro, A., et al. (2014) Relationship among Corneal Biomechanics, Refractive Error, and Axial Length. Optometry and Vision Science, 91, 507-513.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[36] Del Buey, M.A., Lavilla, L., Ascaso, F.J., et al. (2014) Assessment of Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Intraocular Pressure in Myopic Spanish Healthy Population. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014, Article ID: 905129.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Wang, J., Li, Y., Jin, Y., et al. (2015) Corneal Biomechanical Prop-erties in Myopic Eyes Measured by a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015, Article ID: 161869.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Matalia, J., Francis, M., Tejwani, S., et al. (2016) Role of Age and Myopia in Simultaneous Assessment of Corneal and Extraocular Tissue Stiffness by Air-Puff Applanation. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 32, 486-493.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[39] Salvetat, M.L., Zeppieri, M., Tosoni, C., et al. (2015) Corneal Deformation Parameters Provided by the Corvis-ST Pa- chy-Tonometer in Healthy Subjects and Glaucoma Patients. Journal of Glaucoma, 24, 568-574.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[40] Asaoka, R., Nakakura, S., Tabuchi, H., et al. (2015) The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry Measured Corneal Parameters and Intraocular Pressure, Corneal Thickness and Corneal Curvature. PLOS ONE, 10, e0140385.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] He, M., Wang, W., Ding, H., et al. (2017) Corneal Bio-mechanical Properties in High Myopia Measured by Dynamic Scheimpflug Imaging Technology. Optometry and Vision Science, 94, 1074-1080.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[42] Zhang, C., Tatham, A.J., Abe, R.Y., et al. (2016) Cor-neal Hysteresis and Progressive Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in Glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 166, 29-36.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] 沈如月, 叶聪, 梁远波, 等. Corvis ST评估高度近视患者角膜生物力学参数及其相关因素[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019(3): 193-199.
[44] Sedaghat, M.R., Momeni-Moghaddam, H., Azimi, A., et al. (2020) Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Varying Severities of Myopia. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8, Article ID: 595330.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Hon, Y., Chen, G.Z., Lu, S.H., et al. (2017) High Myopes Have Lower Normalised Corneal Tangent Moduli (Less Stiff' Corneas) than Low Myopes. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 37, 42-50.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Nguyen, B.A., Reilly, M.A. and Roberts, C.J. (2020) Biomechanical Contribution of the Sclera to Dynamic Corneal Response in Air-Puff Induced Deformation in Human Donor Eyes. Experimental Eye Research, 191, Article ID: 107904.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] He, M., Ding, H., He, H., et al. (2017) Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Healthy Children Measured by Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology. BMC Ophthalmology, 17, Article No. 70.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] 李芳, 钟兴武, 杨军, 等. 应用CorVis ST评估不同屈光状态儿童的角膜生物力学特性[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021, 43(8): 766-771.
[49] 龙文, 李周越, 胡音, 等. 角膜生物力学及校正眼压与青少年屈光状态的相关性[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2020, 22(9): 652-658.

为你推荐