川渝黔地区五峰组–龙马溪组页岩储层地质特征差异研究
Geological Characteristics Difference Study of Wufeng-Longmaxi Shale Formations from Sichuan, Chongqing and Guizhou Regions
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2022.126087, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 龙海岑:贵州乌江能源集团有限责任公司,贵州 贵阳;李刚权*, 吴 松:贵州页岩气勘探开发有限责任公司,贵州 遵义;蓝宝锋:贵州能源产业研究院有限公司,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 四川盆地五峰组–龙马溪组页岩气地质特征差异分析Sichuan Basin Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation Shale Gas Geological Features Difference Analysis
摘要: 上奥陶统五峰组–下志留统龙马溪组广泛分布于四川、重庆、湖北、贵州等中上扬子地区,是目前我国页岩气最主要的勘探开发地层。通过对比川渝黔地区五峰组–龙马溪组页岩储层地质背景、地球物理测井及岩心测试结果,分析了川渝黔地区五峰组–龙马溪组页岩地质特征、源岩品质、物性、测井响应及构造特征的差异及其原因,探索四川盆地盆内和盆外页岩气有效开发对策。结果表明:四川盆地五峰组–龙马溪组页岩厚度大,优质厚度达30米,而盆外地区页岩厚度逐渐减薄。页岩有机质含量以大于1%为主;涪陵地区有机碳含量最高,平均达2%以上。正安、涪陵、南川三个区块页岩孔隙度高频为2%~4%,但正安区块页岩的低频分布主要小于2%,而涪陵地区页岩孔隙度低频分布为5.5%~7.5%。涪陵地区页岩含气性最高,解析气分布主频约2 m3/t。正安、凤冈页岩的脆性指数高,达到60%以上,可能与陆源碎屑供给有关。地球物理测井响应方面,四川盆地内部页岩呈现高自然伽马、声波时差大、密度小,含气量高,盆外的正安、凤冈地区页岩则呈现电阻率高的特点,且含气量相对较低。四川盆地内部页岩地层普遍为“背斜”型正向构造,盆外则多为“向斜型”负向构造形态。盆外页岩地层产状陡,黔北地区龙马溪页岩地层倾角达20˚以上。通过对比分析,认为盆外页岩气勘探开发面临的主要问题是如何“效益开发”。“降本增效、提产提效”是四川盆地外部页岩气产业发展的攻关方向。
Abstract: The Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation, widely distributed in Sichuan, Chongqing, Hubei, Guizhou and other middle and upper Yangtze regions, is the main shale gas exploration and development strata in China. By comparing the geological background, geophysical and core testing results of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale formation from Sichuan, Chongqing, and Guizhou regions, the geological characteristics, source rock quality, physical properties, logging response, and tectonic characteristics of shales in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation from these three regions are analyzed. Then the effective development strategies of shales from Sichuan Basin and out of Sichuan Basin are proposed. Results show that the thickness of high-quality Wufeng-Long- maxi Formation in Sichuan Basin is high and up to 30 meters, while the total thickness significantly decreases out of Sichuan Basin. The total organic carbon content of these shales is commonly higher than 1%. Shales in Fuling block have the highest organic carbon content with an average value of being more than 2%. Main porosity in Zheng’an, Fuling and Nanchuan blocks is between 2% and 4%. Many shales in Zheng’an block have porosity less than 2%, while some shales in Fuling block have porosity of about 5.5%~7.5%. Shales in Fuling block have the highest gas content, with the dominant gas content of about 2 m3/t. The brittleness index of Zheng’an and Fenggang shales is higher than 60%, which may be related to the supplement of terrigenous detrital. In terms of geophysical logging responses, shales in Sichuan Basin have high natural gamma ray, large acoustic time difference, low density and high gas content, while shales in Zheng’an and Fenggang areas, outside the basin, have high resistivity and relatively low gas content. Shale formations in the Sichuan Basin generally have positive anticlinal structure, while the structure of shale formations outside Sichuan basin is mostly negative synclinal. Longmaxi shale formation in northern Guizhou region has a dip angle of over 20˚. Through comprehensively comparative analysis, it is concluded that the main problem of shales outside Sichuan basin is how to develop shale gas with benefit. Reducing cost and improving production are the key direction for the development of shale gas industry outside of Sichuan Basin.
文章引用:龙海岑, 李刚权, 蓝宝锋, 吴松. 川渝黔地区五峰组–龙马溪组页岩储层地质特征差异研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2022, 12(6): 913-924. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2022.126087

参考文献

[1] 郭彤楼, 何希鹏, 曾萍, 等. 复杂构造区页岩气藏地质特征与效益开发建议——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1490-1500.
[2] 邹才能, 杨智, 朱如凯, 等. 中国非常规油气勘探开发与理论技术进展[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89(6): 979-1007.
[3] 张金川, 金之钧, 袁明生. 页岩气成藏机理和分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2004, 24(7): 15-18.
[4] 梁狄刚, 郭彤楼, 陈建平, 等. 中国南方海相生烃成藏研究的若干新进展(一): 南方四套区域性海相烃源岩的分布[J]. 海相油气地质, 2008, 13(2): 1-16.
[5] 汤济广, 汪凯明, 秦德超, 等. 川东南南川地区构造变形与页岩气富集[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(5): 11-21.
[6] 梁峰, 张琴, 熊小林, 等. 四川盆地及周缘五峰组-龙马溪组富有机质页岩沉积演化模式[J]. 沉积学报, 2019, 37(4): 847-857.
[7] 王玉满, 李新景, 董大忠, 等. 上扬子地区五峰组-龙马溪组优质页岩沉积主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2017, 37(4): 9-20.
[8] 蒲泊伶, 董大忠, 耳闯, 等. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩有利储层发育特征及其影响因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2013, 33(12): 41-47.
[9] 张福, 黄艺, 蓝宝锋, 等. 正安地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(1): 49-56.
[10] 翟刚毅, 包书景, 庞飞, 等. 贵州遵义地区安场向斜“四层楼”页岩油气成藏模式研究[J]. 中国地质, 2017, 44(1): 1-12.
[11] 张浩然, 姜华, 陈志勇, 等. 四川盆地及周缘地区加里东运动幕次研究现状综述[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(5): 118-126.
[12] 苗凤彬, 彭中勤, 汪宗欣, 等. 雪峰隆起西缘下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩裂缝发育特征及主控因素[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(2): 31-42.
[13] 王玉满, 董大忠, 李建忠, 等. 黄金亮. 川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层特征[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(4): 551-561。
[14] Yang, F., Ning, Z.F., Zhang, R., et al. (2015) Investigations on the Methane Sorption Capacity of Marine Shales from Sichuan Basin, China. International Journal of Coal Geology, 146, 104-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Xu, S., Hao, F., Shu, Z.G., et al. (2020) Pore Structures of Different Types of Shales and Shale Gas Exploration of the Ordovician Wufeng and Silurian Longmaxi Successions in the Eastern Sichuan Basin, South China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 193, Article ID: 104271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Yang, F., Xu, S., Hao, F., et al. (2019) Petrophysical Characteristics of Shales with Different Lithofacies in Jiaoshiba Area, Sichuan Basin, China: Implications for Shale Gas Accumulation Mechanism. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 109, 394-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 胡德高, 杨峰, 舒志国, 等. 川南地区龙马溪页岩气体滑脱效应实验研究[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(2): 36-41.
[18] 李琪琪, 蓝宝锋, 李刚权, 等. 黔中隆起北缘五峰-龙马溪组页岩元素地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 地球科学, 2021, 46(9): 3172-3188.
[19] 张福, 黄艺, 戴岑璞, 等. 黔北地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩储层特征分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2020, 43(3): 94-101.
[20] 曾棒, 刘小平, 刘国勇, 等. 陆相泥页岩层系岩相测井识别与预测: 以南堡凹陷拾场次洼为例[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(1): 69-79.
[21] 李延钧, 张烈辉, 冯媛媛, 等. 页岩有机碳含量测井评价方法及其应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(1): 169-175.
[22] 谭茂金. 有机页岩测井岩石物理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2015.
[23] Li, S.J., Li, Y.Q., He, Z.L., et al. (2020) Differential Deformation on Two Sides of Qiyueshan Fault along the Eastern Margin of Sichuan Basin, China, and Its Influence on Shale Gas Preservation. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 121, Article ID: 104602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Liu, R., Hao, F., Engelder, T., et al. (2021) Influence of Tectonic Exhumation on Porosity of Wufeng-Longmaxi Shale in the Fuling Gas Field of the Eastern Sichuan Basin, China. AAPG, 104, 939-959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] 侯宇光, 张坤朋, 何生, 等. 南方下古生界海相页岩极低电阻率成因及其地质意义[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(1): 80-89.