电针刺激辅助神经阻滞在人工全膝关节置换术后疼痛中的相关研究
Study on Electroacupuncture Assisted Nerve Block in Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty
摘要: 目的:探究电针刺激辅助神经阻滞在人工全膝关节置换术后疼痛中的相关研究。方法:本研究为回顾性病例对照研究,以自2017年1月至2022年1月收入我院骨伤科的103例符合条件的OA患者为研究对象,根据是否采用电针刺激,将入组的103例患者分成2组,即电针联合组和神经阻滞组。TKA术中采用坐骨神经阻滞,术后电针刺激穴位,利用视觉模拟法(VAS)评分和数字分级法(NRS)评定术前和术后两组患者的疼痛,以及生活质量评分。结果:手术前,两组间VAS评分和NRS评分比较均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。手术后,电针联合组评分均显著低于神经阻滞组(P < 0.05),手术前,两组各项生活质量评分比较无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。手术后,电针联合组各项评分显著高于神经阻滞组(P < 0.05)。结论:电针联合神经阻滞也可以提高患者术后的生活质量,进而提高患者的术后满意度,有利于TKA技术在基层医院的开展。
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the effect of electroacupuncture assisted nerve block on pain after total knee arthroplasty. Methods: This study was a retrospective case-control study. 103 eligible OA patients who were admitted to the Department of orthopedics and traumatology of our hospital from January 2017 to January 2022 were studied. According to whether electroacupuncture stimulation was used or not, 103 patients were divided into two groups, namely electroacupuncture combined group and nerve block group. During TKA, sciatic nerve block and postoperative electroacupuncture were used to stimulate acupoints. The pain and quality of life of the two groups were evaluated by visual analog (VAS) score and digital grading (NRS). Results: Before operation, there was no significant difference in VAS score and NRS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). After operation, the scores of electroacupuncture combined group were significantly lower than those of nerve block group (P < 0.05). Before operation, there was no significant difference in the scores of quality of life between the two groups (P > 0.05). After operation, the scores of electroacupuncture combined group were significantly higher than those of nerve block group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The electroacupuncture combined with nerve block can also improve the postoperative quality of life of patients, and then improve the postoperative satisfaction of patients, which is conducive to the development of TKA technology in grass-roots hospitals.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
杨辉. 超声波引导收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术后镇痛的临床效果[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2022, 38(1): 14.
|
|
[2]
|
宋伟, 张亚鑫, 贾大洲, 等. 辅助应用地塞米松联合呋塞米对全膝关节置换后早期疼痛和肿胀的影响[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2022, 26(33): 5317-5322.
|
|
[3]
|
苏爽, 王景红, 何名江. 人工全膝关节置换术围术期疼痛用药管理路径的建立及效果[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2021, 19(6): 75-79.
|
|
[4]
|
李毅, 桂斌捷, 周烨, 唐淼, 刘长征. 口服氨甲环酸的全膝关节置换术后引流与否的临床效果比较[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(5): 4614-4620.
|
|
[5]
|
梁艾利. 分析规范化疼痛护理在人工全膝关节置换围术期的应用效果[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2021, 29(3): 74-75.
|
|
[6]
|
李薇迪. 中医推拿联合功能锻炼对人工全膝关节置换术后患者的影响[J]. 实用中西医结合临床, 2021, 21(12): 148-149.
|
|
[7]
|
郭江, 张忠杰, 张才东, 等. 人工全膝关节置换术治疗晚期类风湿性关节炎的疗效研究[J]. 泸州医学院学报, 2022(3): 240-242.
|
|
[8]
|
杨伶俐, 廖淑梅, 任辉. 单侧人工全膝关节置换术后患者的功能性活动能力及影响因素分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2021, 43(6): 560-566.
|
|
[9]
|
冯宾, 张博, 任毅, 等. 人工全膝关节表面置换术后连续股神经阻滞与经静脉患者自控镇痛的随机对照研究[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2018, 11(1): 25-29.
|
|
[10]
|
孙国丽, 金瑛, 胡雪蓉. 耳穴压豆联合中医定向透药对全膝关节置换术后患者早期疼痛的干预研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(6): 1010-1013.
|