具身情绪下编码状态对情绪词汇再认的影响
The Effect of Encoding State under Embodied Emotion on Emotional Word Recognition
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2022.116339, PDF,   
作者: 赵奥东:福建师范大学心理学院,福建 福州
关键词: 具身情绪编码情绪词汇再认Embodied Emotion Encoding Emotional Vocabulary Recognition
摘要: 实验采用Havas等(2007)的具身情绪启动范式(即通过面部动作启动情绪),在个体具身情绪启动后,使用“学习–再认”范式,以不同效价的情绪词汇为学习材料,考察具身情绪下编码状态对情绪词语效价再认的影响。比较积极、消极情绪下个体对情绪词汇的再认正确率和和反应时的差异,发现积极编码相对于消极编码对情绪词汇的再认表现出优势(F(2, 33) = 3.656, p < 0.05),表现为积极编码下反应时更短且正确率更高。同时发现积极词汇相较于中性和消极词汇也对再认表现出优势,具体为积极词汇的反应时更短,且消极词汇和中性词汇在不同编码情绪下存在交互作用(F(1, 32) = 4.696, p < 0.05)。上述结果表明,阈下的具身情绪启动范式是有效的;积极的情绪状态对带有情绪属性的学习材料再认产生了积极影响,表现为反应时更短。
Abstract: The experiment used Havas et al.’s (2007) embodied emotion priming paradigm (i.e., emotion priming through facial actions) to examine the effect of encoding state on the valence of emotion words under embodied emotions using a “learning-recognition” paradigm after individuals’ em-bodied emotion priming, using emotion words of different valence as learning materials. When comparing the correctness and response time of the positive and negative emotions, it was found that positive coding showed an advantage over negative coding in the recognition of emotion words (F(2, 33) = 3.656, p < 0.05), with shorter response time and higher correctness under positive coding. It was also found that positive words also showed an advantage over neutral and negative words for recognition, specifically shorter reaction times for positive words, and that there was an interaction between negative and neutral words across coded emotions (F(1, 32) = 4.696, p < 0.05). These results suggest that the subthreshold embodied emotion priming paradigm is effective; positive emotional states positively influenced the recognition of learned material with emotional attributes, as evidenced by shorter response times.
文章引用:赵奥东. 具身情绪下编码状态对情绪词汇再认的影响[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2022, 11(6): 2475-2481. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2022.116339

参考文献

[1] 白亚停, 何文广. 二语具身认知: 自动激活还是母语中介? [J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(11): 1970-1978.
[2] 刘志斌, 高申春. 从心智进化到心智生成——瓦雷拉的心智生成观及其对具身认知的启示[J]. 心理学探新, 2015, 35(6): 488-492.
[3] Price, T.F. and Harmon-Jones, E. (2015) Embodied Emotion: The Influence of Manipulated Facial and Bodily States on Emotive Responses. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 6, 461-473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 罗春春, 郝晓燕. 基于双重注意力模型的微博情感倾向性分析[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 56(2): 236-243.
[5] Malik, A.S., Boyko, O., Atkar, N. and Young, W.F. (2001) A Comparative Study of MR Imaging Profile of Titanium Pedicle Screws. Acta Radiologica, 42, 291-293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 易仲怡, 杨文登. 温和具身认知的产生与发展[J]. 心理研究, 2018, 11(2): 106-112.
[7] 叶浩生, 苏佳佳, 苏得权. 身体的意义: 生成论视域下的情绪理论[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(12): 1393-1404.
[8] 王卓彦, 叶浩生. 感觉运动模拟隐喻理论的形成与发展[J]. 心理学探新, 2020, 40(3): 203-208.
[9] 郑希付. 焦虑情绪与启动情绪两种状态下的记忆信息处理[J]. 心理科学, 2005(2): 351-355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Wu, L., Huang, R., Wang, Z., Nimal, S.J., Wei, L.Q., Yang, W.P. and Chen, J.X. (2020) Embodied Emotion Regulation: The Influence of Implicit Emotional Compatibility on Creative Thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article No. 1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 王九霞. 具身情绪对情绪词语再认成绩的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2017.
[12] 王雪. 身体活动对情绪体验的影响的实证研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2017.
[13] Rebekka, H. (2015) Embodied Emotions: A Naturalist Approach to a Normative Phenomenon. Taylor and Francis, Abingdon-on-Thames.
[14] 许远理, 熊承清. 情绪智力的思想渊源及理论发展脉络[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011, 31(1): 28-32+94.
[15] Spackman, M.P. and Miller, D. (2008) Embodying Emotions: What Emotion Theorists Can Learn from Simulations of Emotions. Minds and Machines, 18, 357-372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 谢超. 表情操控对情绪概念加工的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广州大学, 2017.