自然与现代威胁性刺激在空间和时间维度上的注意偏向
The Attentional Bias between Modern and Natural Threatening Stimuli in Time and Spatial Dimensions
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.126271, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 吴 瑕:天津师范大学心理学部,天津;教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津;学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室,天津;中国科学院大学心理学系,北京;杨雨璇:天津师范大学心理学部,天津;姜云鹏:天津师范大学心理学部,天津;教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津;学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室,天津
关键词: 威胁性刺激现代自然注意偏向注意瞬脱Threatening Stimuli Modern Natural Attentional Bias Attentional Blink
摘要: 对威胁性刺激的快速识别和自动化的注意加工具有重要的进化意义。本研究分别从空间和时间维度上,采用威胁线索空间注意范式和快速序列视觉呈现范式,对自然和现代威胁性刺激的注意偏向和注意瞬脱的影响进行考察。结果发现,个体对现代威胁性刺激在空间上体现为注意解除困难,在时间上体现为注意瞬脱的降低,而自然威胁性刺激则主要体现在空间维度上的注意回避趋势。结果说明,相较于自然威胁性刺激,现代威胁性刺激具有更明显的加工优势和显著的注意捕获,更不易受到加工时间的限制;而对自然威胁性刺激则会主动将注意转移至刺激以外的位置,并根据任务需求进行注意抑制。本研究支持了基于相关性的模型,认为个体的注意分配偏向于对其有意义的关键刺激,灵活且依赖于情境。
Abstract: The rapid detection and automatic attentional processing for threatening stimuli has great signi-ficance to the biological evolution. In order to explore the difference of attentional bias between natural and modern threatening stimuli from the dimensions of space and time, we conducted two experiments by using threatening cue spatial attentional paradigm and rapid sequence visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm, respectively. The results showed that the modern threatening stimuli had a significant processing superiority, which was reflected by the impaired attentional disengagement on the spatial dimension and the reduction of attentional blink effect on the time dimension, whereas the effect of natural threatening stimuli was mainly manifested as the tendency of attentional avoidance on the spatial dimension. The results demonstrated that threatening stimuli could capture attention of individuals and maintain it for a while, moreover, this process is less likely to be restricted by attentional time processing. For natural threatening stimuli, individuals tended to pay attention to the location outside of them. In conclusion, the present study supports the correlation-based model, which indicates the allocation of attention is biased toward key stimuli that are meaningful to them, and is more flexible and context-dependent.
文章引用:吴瑕, 杨雨璇, 姜云鹏 (2022). 自然与现代威胁性刺激在空间和时间维度上的注意偏向. 心理学进展, 12(6), 2279-2289. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.126271

参考文献

[1] 贾磊, 李肖, 孙晓, 张庆林, 李海江, 蒋军(2012). 情绪图片的效价和唤醒度在注意瞬脱对抗效应中的作用: 来自ERP的证据. 心理发展与教育, 28(4), 376-383.
[2] 孙晓(2013). 知觉负载对情绪词语注意瞬脱对抗效应的影响机制. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[3] 王福兴, 李文静, 颜志强, 段朝辉, 李卉(2015). 幼儿对威胁性刺激蛇的注意觉察: 来自眼动证据. 心理学报, 47(6), 774-786.
[4] 张环, 侯双, 王海曼, 廉宇煊, 杨海波(2020). 他人在场条件下的社会分享型提取诱发遗忘. 心理学报, 52(6), 716-729.
[5] 张禹, 罗禹, 赵守盈, 陈维, 李红(2014). 对威胁刺激的注意偏向: 注意定向加速还是注意解除困难? 心理科学进展, 22(7), 1129-1138.
[6] Anderson, A. K. (2005). Affective Influences on the Attentional Dynamics Supporting Awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 258-281.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Blanchette, I. (2006). Snakes, Spiders, Guns, and Syringes: How Specific Are Evolutionary Constraints on the Detection of Threatening Stimuli? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1484-1504.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Boyer, P., & Bergstrom, B. (2011). Threat-Detection in Child Development : An Evolutionary Perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1034-1041.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Broadbent, D. E., & Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From Detection to Identification : Response to Multiple Targets in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 105-113.[CrossRef
[10] Broeren, S., & Lester, K. J. (2013). Relevance Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Attentional Bias to Relevant Stimuli in Children. Emotion, 13, 262-269.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Burra, N., Barras, C., Coll, S. Y., & Kerzel, D. (2016). Electrophysiological Evidence for Attentional Capture by Irrelevant Angry Facial Expressions. Biological Psychology, 120, 69-80.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Coelho, C. M., Cloete, S. & Wallis, G. (2010). The Face-in-the-Crowd Effect: When Angry Faces Are Just Cross(es). Journal of Vision, 10, 1-14.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by both PET and fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 7426-7435.[CrossRef
[14] Dalgleish, T. (2004). The Emotional Brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 583-589.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] De Oca, B. M., & Black, A. A. (2013). Bullets versus Burgers: Is It Threat or Relevance That Captures Attention? American Journal of Psychology, 126, 287-300.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Dhum, M., Herwig, U., Opialla, S., Siegrist, M., & Brühl, A. B. (2017). Evolutionary and Modern Image Content Differentially Influence the Processing of Emotional Pictures. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article No. 415.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2003). On Wildebeests and Humans: The Preferential Detection of Negative Stimuli. Psychological Science, 14, 14-18.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P. M. (2001). Differential Attentional Guidance by Unattended Faces Expressing Positive and Negative Emotion. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1004-1013.[CrossRef
[19] Esteves, F., Dimberg, U., & Ohman, A. (1994). Automatically Elicited Fear: Conditioned Skin Conductance Responses to Masked Facial Expressions. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 393-413.[CrossRef
[20] Fabio, R. A., & Caprì, T. (2019). Automatic and Controlled Attentional Capture by Threatening Stimuli. Heliyon, 5, e01752.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Flowe, H. D., Hope, L., & Hillstrom, A. P. (2013). Oculomotor Examination of the Weapon Focus Effect: Does a Gun Automatically Engage Visual Attention? PLOS ONE, 8, e81011.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Fox, E., Griggs, L., & Mouchlianitis, E. (2007). The Detection of Fear-Relevant Stimuli: Are Guns Noticed as Quickly as Snakes? Emotion, 7, 691-696.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do Threatening Stimuli Draw or Hold Visual Attention in Subclinical Anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Heeren, A., Reese, H. E., McNally, R. J., & Philippot, P. (2012). Attention Training toward and away from Threat in Social Phobia: Effects on Subjective, Behavioral, and Physiological Measures of Anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 30-39.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Kiss, M., Grubert, A., Petersen, A., & Eimer, M. (2012). Attentional Capture by Salient Distractors during Visual Search Is Determined by Temporal Task Demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 749-759.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Klein, A. M., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2011). Approach and Avoidance Tendencies in Spider Fearful Children: The Approach-Avoidance Task. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20, 224-231.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] LoBue, V. (2010). What’s So Scary about Needles and Knives? Examining the Role of Experience in Threat Detection. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 180-187.[CrossRef
[28] LoBue, V., Matthews, K., Harvey, T., & Stark, S. L. (2014). What Accounts for the Rapid Detection of Threat? Evidence for an Advantage in Perceptual and Behavioral Responding from Eye Movements. Emotion, 14, 816-823.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] March, D. S., Gaertner, L., & Olson, M. A. (2017). In Harm’s Way: On Preferential Response to Threatening Stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1519-1529.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Most, S. B., Chun, M. M., Widders, D. M., Haven, N., & Zald, D. H. (2005). Attentional Rubbernecking: Cognitive Control and Personality in Emotion-Induced Blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 654-661.[CrossRef
[31] Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, Phobias, and Preparedness: Toward an Evolved Module of Fear and Fear Learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483-522.[CrossRef
[32] Pessoa, L. (2008). On the Relationship between Emotion and Cognition. Nature Review Neuroscience, 9, 148-158.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Pessoa, L., & Adolphs, R. (2010). Emotion Processing and the Amygdala: From a “Low Road” to “Many Roads” of Evaluating Biological Significance. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 773-782.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Purkis, H. M., Lester, K. J., & Field, A. P. (2011). But What about the Empress of Racnoss? The Allocation of Attention to Spiders and Doctor Who in a Visual Search Task Is Predicted by Fear and Expertise. Emotion, 11, 1484-1488.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Sabatinelli, D., Bradley, M. M., Fitzsimmons, J. R., & Lang, P. J. (2005). Parallel Amygdala and Inferotemporal Activation Reflect Emotional Intensity and Fear Relevance. NeuroImage, 24, 1265-1270.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Subra, B., Muller, D., Fourgassie, L., Chauvin, A., & Alexopoulos, T. (2018). Of Guns and Snakes: Testing a Modern Threat Superiority Effect. Cognition and Emotion, 32, 81-91.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Trippe, R. H., Hewig, J., Heydel, C., Hecht, H., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2007). Attentional Blink to Emotional and Threatening Pictures in Spider Phobics: Electrophysiology and Behavior. Brain Research, 1148, 149-160.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Weymar, M., Löw, A., & Hamm, A. O. (2011). Emotional Memories Are Resilient to Time: Evidence from the Parietal ERP Old/New Effect. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 632-640.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Xu, Z., Yang, W., Zhou, Z., & Ren, Y. (2020). Cue-Target Onset Asyn-chrony Modulates Interaction between Exogenous Attention and Audiovisual Integration. Cognitive Processing, 21, 261-270.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Zhang, S., & Guo, Q. (2019). Superiority Effect in Detecting Phylogenetic Threats under Unattentional Condition: A Visual Mismatch Negativity Study. Journal of Psychology Research, 9, 353-370.[CrossRef
[41] Zsido, A. N., Deak, A., & Bernath, L. (2019). Is a Snake Scarier than a Gun? The Ontogenetic-Phylogenetic Dispute from a New Perspective: The Role of Arousal. Emotion, 19, 726-732.[CrossRef] [PubMed]