基于PCA-Bayes综合判别方法的祁东矿煤层顶板突水水源判别研究
Research on the Source of Water Inrush from Coal Roof in Qidong Mine Based on PCA-Bayes Comprehensive Discrimination Method
摘要: 祁东煤矿煤层顶板压架突水事故频发,准确、快速地识别突水水源是防止突水再次发生的关键。为此,从祁东煤矿二类含水层中提取了28个训练水样以及潘二矿三类含水层的11个水样作为验证样本,以Ca2+、Mg2+、Na++ K2+、HCO3-、CI-、SO42-为评价变量。采用主成分分析法消除训练样本中的冗余离子变量,然后结合Bayes法建立模型,判别结果表明:新生界松散含水层(I)水样判别正确率为100%,煤系砂岩水(II)水样判别正确率为66.67%,太原组灰岩水(III)水样判别正确率为100%,模型的综合精度为90.91%。与单一Bayes判别方法相比,该方法具有准确率高、速度快等优点,基于该模型判别结果,可在煤矿突水事故发生后快速查明突水原因,有效预防矿井水害。
Abstract: Because water inrush accidents occurred frequently in Qidong Coal Mine’s roof pressing support, it’s the key to identify the source of water inrush accurately and rapidly to prevent water inrush from happening again. Based on the hydrogeological data collected in Qidong Coal Mine, according to the hydrochemical characteristics of aquifer, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na++ K2+, HCO3-、CI-、SO42- were selected to establish a water inrush source discrimination model based on the combination of Principal Component Analysis and Bayes discrimination. Taking 28 water samples from Qidong Coal Mine as training samples and 11 water samples from Pan NO.2 Coal Mine as verification samples, the model is tested and applied. The Principal Component Analysis method is used to eliminate redundant ion variables in the training samples, and then the Bayes method is used to establish a model. The discriminant results show that the discriminant accuracy of Cenozoic loose aquifer (I) water samples is 100 %, the discriminant accuracy of coal measure sandstone water (II) water samples is 66.67 %, the discriminant accuracy of Taiyuan Formation limestone water (III) water samples is 100 %, and the comprehensive accuracy of the model is 90.91 %. Compared with the direct Bayes discrimination, the model reduces the calculation error caused by a large number of redundant original data and improves the calculation accuracy, makes the discrimination more accurate.
文章引用:彭涛声, 胡友彪, 琚棋定, 胡泰丰. 基于PCA-Bayes综合判别方法的祁东矿煤层顶板突水水源判别研究[J]. 矿山工程, 2022, 10(3): 244-257. https://doi.org/10.12677/ME.2022.103029

参考文献

[1] 袁亮. 我国深部煤与瓦斯共采战略思考[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(1): 1-6.
[2] Gui, H., Song, X. and Lin, M. (2017) Water-Inrush Mechanism Research Mining above Karst Confined Aquifer and Applications in North China Coalmines. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10, Article No. 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Kalantari, H. and Ali Ghoreishi-Madiseh, S. (2019) Study of Mine Exhaust Heat Recovery System with Coupled Heat Exchangers. Energy Procedia, 158, 3976-3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 徐星, 孙光中, 田坤云. GA-BP神经网络在煤矿突水水源判别中的应用[J]. 煤炭技术, 2018, 37(10): 172-174.
[5] 郭中安, 吴洪斌, 姜海滨, 李相通, 张海龙. 主成分分析与遗传算法优化ELM模型的矿井突水水源识别方法[J]. 中国科技论文, 2021, 16(9): 1010-1016+1022.
[6] 张妹, 刘启蒙, 张宇通. 基于PCA水水源Fisher判别模型[J]. 煤炭技术, 2018, 37(3): 172-174.
[7] 曲兴玥, 施龙青. 基于Matlab因子分析及距离判别模型的矿井突水水源识别[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(8):178-182
[8] Farnham, I.M., Stetzenbach, K.J., Singh, A.K. and Johannesson, K.H. (2000) Deciphering Groundwater Flow Systems in Oasis Valley, Nevada, Using Trace Element Chemistry, Multivariate Statistics, and Geographical Information System. Mathematical Geology, 32, 943-968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 胡友彪, 邢世平, 张淑莹. 基于可拓模型判别矿井突水水源[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 37(6): 34-40.
[10] Uddin, M.P., Mamun, M.A. and Hossain, M.A. (2019) Effective Feature Extraction through Segmentation-Based Folded-PCA for Hyperspectral Image Classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40, 7190-7220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 向晓蕊. 兴隆庄矿井水化学特征演化及识别模式研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 廊坊: 华北科技学院, 2016.
[12] 徐星, 李垣志, 张文勇, 曾珠. MPSO-BP模型在矿井突水水源判别中的应用[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2017, 26(5): 140-148.
[13] 李小胜, 陈珍珍. 如何正确应用 SPSS 软件做主成分分析[J]. 统计研究, 2010, 27(8): 105-108.
[14] 张好, 姚多喜, 鲁海峰, 朱宁宁, 薛凉. 主成分分析与Bayes判别法在突水水源判别中的应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2017, 45(5): 87-93.
[15] 刘向远, 刘丹, 刘建. 灰色局势决策法在地下水水质评价中的应用[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2007, 33(1): 45-47.
[16] 曹丽文, 吴圣林, 于宗仁, 王忠胜. 基于灰色局势决策理论的工程投标决策方法[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2004, 32(7): 27-30.