挠力河保护区退耕湿地大型底栖动物群落结构及多样性研究
Study on the Community Structure and Biodiversity of Macroinvertebrates in Recliamed Wetlands of Naolihe Reserve
DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2022.124087, PDF,   
作者: 王金武, 丁 成, 王广鑫, 崔兴波:黑龙江挠力河国家级自然保护区管理局,黑龙江 双鸭山;姜海霞, 刘曼红*:东北林业大学野生动物与自然保护地学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨
关键词: 挠力河国家级自然保护区大型底栖动物群落结构摄食功能群聚类分析Naolihe National Nature Reserve Macroinvertebrates Community Structure Functional Feeding Groups Cluster Analysis
摘要: 为研究挠力河国家级自然保护区的大型底栖动物恢复现状,在退耕湿地和自然湿地分别设置6个采样点于2019年夏季和秋季进行大型底栖动物样本采集,研究结果表明,采集到的大型底栖动物隶属于3门6纲16目35科72种,其中昆虫纲种类最多。对夏季和秋季退耕湿地与自然湿地的优势种进行配对样本t检验,发现差异性均显著(P < 0.05)。夏季的共有优势种为:乌苏里圆田螺(Cipangopaludina ussuriensis)和多足摇蚊属一种(Polypedilum sp.);秋季为多足摇蚊属一种、摇蚊属一种(Chironomus sp.)和划蝽科的(Graptocorixini sp.)。夏季退耕湿地Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H’)和Margalef丰富度指数(d)的最高值均出现在样点S6,分别为2.203和3.234;分别低于自然湿地(2.631和4.645)。秋季退耕湿地生物多样性指数H’、d的最高值分别为2.623和4.215,高于自然湿地(1.824, 3.107),夏季自然湿地摄食功能群的种类数及个体数均大于退耕湿地。退耕湿地中,撕食者具有一定的优势。自然湿地捕食者和撕食者均占优势。秋季自然湿地与退耕湿地物种丰富度差异并不明显,仅撕食者在退耕湿地数量多于自然湿地。为了揭示不同调查断面大型底栖动物群落的差异,以各调查断面大型底栖动物的摄食功能群数据构建Bray-Curtis相似矩阵,若以80%的相似性来划分,将夏季退耕湿地和自然湿地共12个调查断面分为三组,聚类分组表明,组内的各断面大型底栖动物群落摄食功能群的相似性较高,其中S2和S4相似性最高,达到90%以上。
Abstract: In order to explore the recovery of macroinvertebrates in Naolihe National Nature Reserve, 6 sampling sites were set up in reclaimed wetlands and natural wetlands respectively, samples of macroinvertebrates were collected in summer and autumn, 2019. The results of research showed that: The macroinvertebrates collected belonged to 72 species, 35 families, 16 orders, 6 classes, 3 phyla, among which insecta had the most species. Mathched samples t-test was performed on the dominant species between reclaimed wetlands and natural wetlands in summer and autumn, and significant differences were found (P < 0.05). The common dominant species in summer were Cipangopaludina ussuriensis and Polypedilum sp.; and in autumn, were Chironomus sp. and Graptocorixini sp. The maximum values of Shannon-Wiener index (H’) and Margalef index index (d) of reclaimed wetlands all appeared at sampling site S6, were 2.203 and 3.234, respectively, which were lower than those of natural wetlands (2.631 and 4.645). The maximum values of Shannon-Wiener index and Margalef index of reclaimed wetlands were 2.623 and 4.215, respectively, higher than those of natural wetlands (1.824 and 3.107). The number of species and individuals of functional feeding groups in natural wetlands in summer was larger than that in reclaimed wetlands. In reclaimed wetlands, predators have certain advantages. Both predators and shredders were dominant in natural wetlands. There was no significant difference in species richness between natural wetlands and reclaimed wetlands in autumn, only the number of predators in reclaimed wetlands was more than that in natural wetlands. In order to reveal the difference of macroinvertebrates communities in different survey sections, Bray-Curtis similarity matrix was constructed with data of macroinvertebrates functional feeding groups in all survey sections. With 80% similarity as the standard of division, a total of 12 survey sections of summer deserted wetlands and natural wetlands were divided into three groups. Group clustering showed that similari-ties of functional feeding groups in every survey sections were high, among them, sampling site S2 and sampling site S4 had the highest similarities, reaching more than 90%.
文章引用:王金武, 丁成, 王广鑫, 崔兴波, 姜海霞, 刘曼红. 挠力河保护区退耕湿地大型底栖动物群落结构及多样性研究[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2022, 12(4): 685-694. https://doi.org/10.12677/AEP.2022.124087

参考文献

[1] 韩明浩, 刘赢男, 周丹, 隋心, 倪红伟, 穆立蔷. 农业活动对三江平原湿地主要植物种群生态位的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(3): 461-467.
[2] 赵锐锋, 姜朋辉, 赵海莉, 樊洁平. 黑河中游湿地景观破碎化过程及其驱动力分析[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(14): 4436-4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 崔兴波, 刘曼红, 马玉堃. 黑龙江挠力河国家级自然保护区退耕还湿工程及效益分析[J]. 黑龙江科学, 2016, 7(19): 153-155.
[4] 段学花, 王兆印, 徐梦珍. 底栖动物与河流生态评价[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2010.
[5] 段学花, 王兆印, 程东升. 典型河床底质组成中底栖动物群落及多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(4): 1664-1672.
[6] 陈国贵, 王文卿, 谷宣, 洪伟, 林宇枫, 王瑁. 漳江口红树植物群落周转对大型底栖动物群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(11): 4310-4317.
[7] 王昱, 李宝龙, 冯起, 王之君, 刘蔚, 张昕雨, 孔德星, 左一锋. 黑河重金属空间分布及与大型底栖动物的关系[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(3): 1354-1365.
[8] 徐霖林, 马长安, 田伟, 吕巍巍, 赵云龙. 淀山湖沉水植物恢复重建对底栖动物的影响[J]. 复旦学报(自然科学版), 2011, 50(3): 260-267.
[9] 刘子刚, 王琦, 彭爱珺, 杨飞. 基于PSM和DID法的湿地自然保护区保护效果分析——以黑龙江省三江和挠力河国家级自然保护区为例[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 49(1): 54-61.
[10] Liu, J.W., Wang, T. and Qiang, Z. (2018) Ecological Water Requirements of Wetlands in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Naoli River. Water Policy, 20, 777-793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 邹红菲, 朱井丽, 吴庆明, 闫晗, 董海艳. SD法在保护区旅游景观评价中的尝试——以挠力河保护区为例[J]. 野生动物学报, 2016, 37(3): 271-276.
[12] 刘曼红, 孟瑶, 曹晶晶, 崔兴波, Nagam, A.M. 挠力河湿地大型底栖动物功能特性[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(1): 76-82.
[13] 张敬东, 王思宏. 塔头苔草及其根区土壤中重金属元素分布研究[J]. 延边大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 39(1): 47-49.
[14] Morse, J.C., Yang, L.F. and Tian, L.X. (1994) Aquatic Insects of China Useful for Monitoring Water Quality. Nanjing: HoHai University Press.
[15] 归鸿, 尤大寿. 中国经济昆虫志, 第四十八册, 蜉蝣目[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995.
[16] 周长发, 苏翠蓉, 归鸿. 中国蜉蝣概述[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.
[17] 刘月英, 张文珍, 王跃先, 等. 中国经济动物志, 淡水软体动物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1979.
[18] Cummins, K.W. and Klug, M.J. (1979) Feeding Ecology of Stream Invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10, 147-172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Cummins, K.W. (1973) Trophic Relations of Aquatic Insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 18, 183-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Poff, N.L., Olden, J.D., Vieira, N.K.M., Finn, D.S., Simmons, M.P., Kondratieff, B.C. (2006) Functional Trait Niches of North American Lotic Insects: Traits-Based Eco-logical Applications in Light of Phylogenetic Relationships. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 25, 730-755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 蒋万祥, 蔡庆华, 唐涛, 渠晓东. 香溪河水系大型底栖动物功能摄食类群生态学[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(10): 5207-5218.
[22] 刘建康. 高级水生生物学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
[23] Yoshimura, C., Tockner, K., Omura, T. and Moog, O. (2006) Species Di-versity and Functional Assessment of Macroinvertebrate Communities in Austrian Rivers. Limnology, 7, 63-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1963) The Mathe-Matical The-ory of Communciation. Univerdity of Illonois, Illonois.
[25] Greig-Smith, P. (1968) Rreview: Perspective in Ecological Theory by R. Margalef. Journal of Ecology, 59, 308-309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Aksnes, D.L. and Wassmann, P. (1993) Modeling the Significance of Zoo-plankton Grazing for Export Production. Journal of Ecology, 38, 978-985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] 于琪, 王珂, 郭杰, 孙晓梅, 刘绍平, 段辛斌, 陈大庆. 长江下游莲花洲港大型底栖动物摄食功能群时空分布及其影响因子[J]. 淡水渔业, 2021, 51(2): 47-54.
[28] 陈其羽. 黑龙江的底栖动物及水利枢纽建成后的预报[J]. 水生生物学集刊, 1959, 5(2): 147-156.
[29] 苏华武, 江晶, 温芳妮, 李晓宇, 闫云君. 湖北清江流域叹气沟河底栖动物群落结构与水质生物学评价[J]. 湖泊科学, 2008, 20(4): 520-528.
[30] Belinda, W.T., Martin, J.R. and Jonathan, S.S. (2003) Cost-Efficient Methods for Marine Pollution Monitoring at Casey Station, East Antarctica: The Choice of Sieve Mesh-Size and Taxonomic Resolution. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 46, 232-243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 安传光, 赵云龙, 林凌, 吕敢堂, 陈亚瞿. 长江口九段沙潮间带大型底栖动物季节分布特征的初步研究[J]. 水产学报, 2007, 31(z1): 52-58.
[32] 蒋万祥, 贾兴焕, 唐涛, 蔡庆华. 底栖动物功能摄食类群对酸性矿山废水的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(18): 5670-5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef