宽恕主题的舞动团体干预对贫困医学生愤怒水平及愤怒控制能力的影响
The Effect of Forgiveness-Themed Dance Movement Group Intervention on Anger Levels and Anger Control Ability in Impoverished Medical Students
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.127276, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈凡莹, 李鸿枭:贵州医科大学医学人文学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 宽恕舞动团体贫困医学生愤怒表达愤怒管理能力Forgiveness Dance Movement Therapy Impoverished Medical Student Anger Expression Anger Management Ability
摘要: 目的:探讨以宽恕为主题的舞动团体干预对降低贫困医学生愤怒水平和提高愤怒控制能力的效果。方法:招募28名贫困医学生并随机分配到干预组和对照组。干预组进行连续8周的,每周2小时的舞动团体干预,对照组只进行心理健康教育。8周后,干预组和对照组均接受生物反馈仪进行愤怒唤醒及控制的实验。两组在实验前后均使用状态–特质愤怒表达问卷(STAXI-2)量表进行测量。结果:干预组除愤怒表达中的外向怒因子结果为不显著外,其余因子得分均高于干预前(P < 0.05),对照组干预前后无显著差异(P > 0.05);生物反馈仪结果显示,干预组在使用舞动方法干预后的皮电水平明显低于诱发后的皮电水平(P = 0.043, t = 2.245, P < 0.05),对照组无明显差异(P = 0.626, t = −0.499, P > 0.05)。结论:宽恕主题的舞动团体能有效减轻贫困医学生的愤怒水平,提高愤怒控制能力。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the effect of dance group movement intervention with the theme of forgiveness on reducing anger level and improving anger control ability of impoverished medical students. Methods: 28 impoverished medical students were recruited and randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group received 2 hours dance movement training for 8 weeks, while the control group only received mental health education for 8 weeks. After 8 weeks, both the experimental group and the control group use the biofeedback instrument to record the galvanic skin response when activate anger and control anger. Both groups were measured by STAXI-2 scale before and after the experiment. Results: All scores except the outward anger in the experimental group were significant higher than those before the intervention (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the control group before and after the intervention (P > 0.05). The result of biofeedback instrument showed that the galvanic skin response was significantly lower in experimental group after intervention by dance movement (P = 0.043, t = 2.245, P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in control group (P = 0.626, t = −0.499, P > 0.05). Conclusion: Forgiveness-themed dance movement intervention can effectively reduce the anger level and improve anger control ability of impoverished medical students.
文章引用:陈凡莹, 李鸿枭 (2022). 宽恕主题的舞动团体干预对贫困医学生愤怒水平及愤怒控制能力的影响. 心理学进展, 12(7), 2321-2328. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.127276

参考文献

[1] 陈翠, 张红静, 江景华, 吴希庆, 张李娜(2010). 宽恕干预对大学生愤怒水平及愤怒控制的影响. 山东大学学报(医学版), 48(5), 147-149+153.
[2] 付伟, 张绍波, 李欣, 韩毅(2016). 宽恕与心理健康关系的meta分析. 中国心理卫生, 30(5), 583-587.
[3] 甘金莲, 梅金姣(2005). 184名贫困医学生心理健康状况调查分析. 医学与社会, (1), 14-15.
[4] 郝琦(2005). 舞蹈治疗: 从身体到心灵. 医学与哲学, 26(3), 61-62.
[5] 蒋宇婧(2014). 未成年犯愤怒状态及表达与攻击性的关系研究. 知识经济, (15), 28-29.[CrossRef
[6] 李海江, 卢家楣(2018). 宽恕心理的行为测量及认知神经机制. 心理科学进展, 41(3), 700-705.[CrossRef
[7] 廖伟芳(2015). 贵州省贫困医学生心理复原力与人格特征关系. 中国学校卫生, 36(8), 1188-1191.
[8] 林冰军(2018). 舞动疗法在高职学生团体心理辅导中的应用. 智库时代, (39), 52-53.
[9] 刘惠军, 高红梅(2012). 状态-特质愤怒表达量表修订版在大学生中的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 26(1), 70-76.
[10] 沈雁雁, 辛静丽, 童颖(2021). 结构式舞动治疗对康复期精神分裂症患者阴性症状及自我效能的影响. 基层医学论坛, 25(27), 3863-3865.[CrossRef
[11] 孙卉, 张田(2021). 宽恕干预对降低农村留守儿童拒绝敏感性的作用. 心理与行为研究, 19(1), 111-117.
[12] 孙卉, 张田, 傅宏(2018). 团体宽恕干预在恋爱受挫群体中的运用及其对大学生心理健康教育的启示. 心理与行为研究, 16(4), 541-548.
[13] 谭海宁, 杨阳, 张红静(2014). 初中生的愤怒情绪现况调查. 中国心理卫生, 28(5), 361-366.
[14] 王平(2011). 大学生的愤怒情绪及其管理. 职业时空, 7(6), 138-141.
[15] 吴希庆, 胡仟, 陈翠(2012). 大学生的宽恕水平对愤怒表达及心理健康的影响. 中国健康心理学, 20(3), 448-450.
[16] 徐丽丽, 冯英俊(2017). 大学生愤怒情绪、宽恕水平和心理健康的相关研究. 黑龙江教育学院学报, 36(4), 88-90.
[17] 徐鹏飞, 黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉(2010). 中国情绪影像材料库的初步编制和评定. 中国心理卫生杂志, 24(7), 551-554+561.
[18] 轩希, 吴捷, 马慧霞, 李洪琴, 徐晟, 陈瀛(2017). 舞动治疗对大学生自我接纳与自我效能感的干预. 中国临床心理学, 25(3), 584-587.
[19] 阎博, 樊富珉, 喻丰(2018). 动觉共情干预在舞蹈动作治疗中的应用. 心理科学进展, 26(3), 496-502.
[20] Batik, M. V., Bingöl, T. Y., Kodaz, A. F., & Hosoglu, R. (2017). Forgiveness and Subjective Happiness of University Students. International Journal of Higher Education, 6, 149-162.[CrossRef
[21] Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive Affect and the Complex Dynamics of Human Flourishing. American Psychologist, 60, Article No. 678.[CrossRef
[22] Kim, J. J., & Enright, R. D. (2017). Fathers’ Anger and Their Sons’ Socioemotional and Academic Outcomes with Implications for Forgiveness. Journal of Social Sciences, 13, 1-8.[CrossRef
[23] McKay, K. M., Hill, M. S., Freedman, S. R., & Enright, R. D. (2007). Towards a Feminist Empowerment Model of Forgiveness Psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory Research, Practice, Training, 44, 14.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Tonnaer, F., Siep, N., van Zutphen, L., Arntz, A., & Cima, M. (2017). Anger Provocation in Violent Offenders Leads to Emotion Dysregulation. Scientific Reports, 7, Article No. 3583.[CrossRef] [PubMed]