大豆和玉米单、间作的氮养分吸收的微分方程建模
Differential Equation Modeling of Nitrogen Nutrient Uptake of Soybean and Maize in Their Mono- and Intercroppings
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2022.117487, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 段国梅, 化存才*:云南师范大学,数学学院,云南 昆明
关键词: 大豆玉米氮素吸收量间作微分方程模型Soybean Maize Nitrogen Uptake Intercropping Differential Equation Model
摘要: 大豆和玉米的氮素吸收量对于提高它们的产量有着重要的意义。在本文中,首先建立了大豆和玉米单作时的氮素吸收量的Logistic微分方程模型(称为单作模型),单作模型的数值模拟分析得出大豆和玉米单作生长的几点结论。进一步,建立了大豆和玉米间作时氮素吸收量的二维微分方程模型(称为间作模型),利用线性稳定性理论证明了唯一的正平衡点是稳定的结点。同时也在参数的一定条件下证明了间作玉米的氮吸收量,以及玉米和大豆的氮吸收总量都大于单作,因而使得间作最终呈现作物增产优势。间作模型的数值结果表明:1) 大豆的氮素吸收量的高峰时间出现在84天左右,玉米的氮素吸收量的高峰时间出现在71天左右。玉米与大豆对氮素吸收高峰时间是错开的,适合间作;2) 在选取合适的参数下,得到的唯一稳定正平衡点是(1.24, 4.29)。因此,在间作条件下,大豆的氮素吸收量为1.24 g,比单作大豆减少了26.19%;但是,间作玉米的氮素吸收量为4.29 g,比单作玉米增加了20.17%,特别地,间作大豆和玉米两者的氮吸收总量增加了5.33%,这就表明,间作产生了氮素吸量的优势。
Abstract: The amount of Nitrogen uptake of soybeans and maize is important for increasing their yields. In this paper, Logistic differential equation models (namely monocropping models) are established firstly for nitrogen uptake of soybean and maize as monocropping respectively. Several conclusions about the growth of soybean and maize monocroppers are given by numerical simulation analysis of the monocropping models. Furthermore, a two-dimensional differential equation model (namely intercropping model) is established for the nitrogen uptake of the soybean and maize as intercrop-ping. By using the linear stability theory, the unique positive equilibrium point is proved as stable node. At the same time, it is proved that the amount of Nitrogen uptake of intercropping maize, as well as the total amount of Nitrogen uptake of intercropping maize and soybean is larger than that of monocropping under certain condition of parameters, so the intercropping takes advantage in increasing productions finally. Numerical results of the intercropping model show that: 1) the peak nitrogen uptake of soybeans occurs around the 84th day, and the peak time for nitrogen uptake of maize occurs around 71st day. The peak time of nitrogen uptake of maize and soybean is staggered, so they are suitable for intercropping; 2) the unique stable positive equilibrium point is obtained (1.24, 4.29) under the selection of suitable parameters. Therefore, under intercropping conditions, the nitrogen uptake of soybeans is 1.24 g, which is less than that of monocropping soybeans by 26.19%; however, the nitrogen uptake of intercropping maize is 4.29 g, which is higher than that of monocropping maize by 20.17%, and the total nitrogen uptake of intercropping soybeans and corn increases by 5.33%. This shows that intercropping results in the advantages of nitrogen uptake.
文章引用:段国梅, 化存才. 大豆和玉米单、间作的氮养分吸收的微分方程建模[J]. 应用数学进展, 2022, 11(7): 4616-4626. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2022.117487

参考文献

[1] 焦光纯. 大豆植株干物质积累与氮素动态变化研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2003.
[2] 吴巍, 赵军. 植物对氮素吸收利用的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(13): 75-78.
[3] 董钻, 谢甫绨. 大豆氮磷钾吸收动态及模式的研究[J]. 作物学报, 1996(1): 89-95.
[4] 何萍, 金继运, 林葆, 王秀芳, 张宽. 不同氮磷钾用量下春玉米生物产量及其组分动态与养分吸收模式研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998(2): 123-130.
[5] 宋海星, 李生秀. 玉米生长量、养分吸收量及氮肥利用率的动态变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003(1): 71-76.
[6] 王立刚, 刘景辉, 刘克礼, 高聚林. 大豆对氮素吸收规律的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2004(6): 162-165.
[7] 张晓娜, 陈平, 庞婷, 等. 玉米/豆科间作种植模式对作物干物质积累、分配及产量的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2017, 35(4): 484-490.
[8] Li, L., Sun, J., Zhang, F., et al. (2006) Root Distribution and Interactions between Intercropped Species. Oecologia (Berlin), 147, 280-290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 吕越. 玉米/大豆种内与种间作物的资源竞争[D]: [博士学位论文]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014.
[10] 张林, 化存才, 强继业. 降低UV-B辐射对烤烟株高影响的非自治Logistic模型[J]. 生物数学学报, 2012, 27(4): 689-694.
[11] 刘春, 张春辉, 郭萨萨. 基于能量模型的水稻生长模型[J]. 应用气象学报, 2013, 24(2): 240-247.
[12] 符云锦. 农作物生长质量的非线性微分方程模型与分析[J]. 汕头大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(4): 31-34.
[13] 李文斌. 声频控制对水稻分蘖期生长影响的微分方程建模[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2019.
[14] 李德盛. 植物生长发育问题的微分方程建模[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2019.
[15] 张沥. 声频影响下番茄生长发育的微分方程建模[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2021.
[16] 梁仕军. 三种不同环境下花生生长发育的微分方程建模[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2021.
[17] 张锦炎, 冯贝叶. 常微分方程几何理论与分支问题[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2000.
[18] 王雪蓉. 施氮水平对玉米/大豆间作干物质累积和养分吸收的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2019.