区块链智能合约与我国法律关联性的研究——以我国《民法典》合同编为例
Research on the Relationship between Blockchain Smart Contracts and China’s Laws—Taking the Contract Compilation of China’s Civil Code as an Example
摘要: 区块链智能合约在我国是起步阶段,对于智能合约实践应用也会出现许多问题且得不到重视,智能合约风险的法律规制对于数字网络化时代具有迫切意义,究其智能合约本质而言最应当重视合约的规制以及根据我国运用智能合约多数为商事群体的现实意义,即应加以研究我国《民法典》合同编对其商事制约关系,以点及面引申智能合约风险纾解的把控和法律构解的完善。我国法律制度并没有考虑到区块链智能合约的法律设计,没有落实其在社会生活的方方面面,本文主要研究在当今我国主要表现于民商事活动的区块链智能合约,研究智能合约与债权合同制度的关联性。智能合约具有合同性质,且与我国《民法典》合同编既具有独立性又具相关性,智能合同在当事人意思表示、合同变更解除等方面都存在与现行合同制度有相关内容,但也有相矛盾的地方,要想将智能合约纳入合同编进行调整,需要考虑到区块链智能合同的特殊性和与合同相关制度的共性。
Abstract: Blockchain smart contracts are in their infancy in my country, and there will be many problems in the practical application of smart contracts, which have not been paid attention to. The legal regulation of smart contract risks is of urgent significance for the digital network era. The essence of smart contracts is the most important. We should pay attention to the regulation of contracts and the practical significance of the use of smart contracts in most commercial groups in China; that is, we should study the relationship between my country’s “Civil Code” contract compilation and its commercial constraints, and to point out the control and risk mitigation of smart contracts. Our country’s legal system does not take into account the legal design of blockchain smart contracts, and does not implement them in all aspects of social life. This paper mainly studies the blockchain smart contracts that are mainly used in civil and commercial activities in my country today, and studies the correlation between smart contracts and the creditor’s rights contract system. However, smart contracts are related to ordinary contracts, and smart contracts are independent from the contract compilation of my country’s Civil Code. It is also relevant. Both smart contracts and ordinary contracts are related to the current contract system in terms of expression of intent, contract validity, defense rights, and contract performance, modification cancellation, breach of contract relief, etc., but there are also contradictions. In order to incorporate smart contracts into contracts for adjustment, it is necessary to take into account the particularity of blockchain smart contracts and the commonalities with contract-related systems.
文章引用:成一鑫. 区块链智能合约与我国法律关联性的研究——以我国《民法典》合同编为例[J]. 争议解决, 2022, 8(3): 431-435. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2022.83057

参考文献

[1] 詹碧华. 《“区块链”是什么?——去中心化的可信数据库》[J]. 中国周刊, 2019(1): 29-31.
[2] Savelyev, A. (2017) Contract Law 2.0: “Smart” Contracts as the Beginning of the End of Classic Contract Law. Information& Communica-tions Technology Law, 26, 116-134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 郭伟嘉, 刘敦楠. 基于智能合约的电动汽车充电服务费自适应调整机制[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2022(6): 6-7.
[4] 张文显. 法哲学通论[M]. 沈阳: 辽宁人民出版社, 2009: 49-52.
[5] Corrales, M., Fenwick, M. and Haapio, H. (2019) Digital Technolo-gies, Legal Design and the Future of the Legal Profession. In: Corrales, M., Fenwick, M. and Haapio, H., Eds., Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain, Springer, Berlin, 6-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 金雪涛, 许志敏. 区块链与学术评价体系变革: 应用场域及可能贡献[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(4): 14-21.
[7] 罗喜月. 民法典合同编视域下智能合约的规制问题[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021.
[8] 谭佐财. 智能合约的法律属性与民事法律关系论[J]. 科技与法律, 2020(6): 65-75.
[9] 陈成荣. 区块链中的智能合约对我国合同法律制度的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2019.
[10] 李伟民. 民法典视域中区块链的法律性质与规制[J]. 上海师范大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2020(5): 46-57.
[11] Nash, E.J. (2020) Blockchain & Smart Contract Technology: Alternative Incentives for Legal Contract Innovation. BYU Law Review, 2019, Article No. 5.
[12] 张雪. 我国区块链平台的法律问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2020.
[13] 韩龙, 程乐. 区块链智能合约的法律解构与风险纾解[J]. 学习与实践, 2022(3): 54-62.
[14] 黄祥钟, 陈铭. 利率分层制度下央行数字货币利率的设计与政策含义[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2021, 36(4): 3-15.
[15] 王雅震. 区块链国产化实践指南基于Fabric2.0 [M]. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2022.