基于博弈理论的DRGs支付方式下医疗机构与医保部门行为分析
Behavior Analysis of Medical Institution and Medical Insurance Department under DRGs Payment Mode Based on Game Theory
摘要: 近年来,为提升医疗服务资源的使用效率和公平性,我国一直在探索新的医疗支付方式,逐步发展出基于DRGs付费的混合支付方式。这种支付方式在一定程度上能够提高医疗服务能力,使医疗质量和管理水平有所上升。本文从博弈论的视角,构建了医保部门与医疗机构在DRGs制度下的博弈模型,得出医疗机构所获额外收入、医保机构的监管成本、罚金高低是博弈均衡的影响因素。结合博弈结果提出加大处罚力度、培养优质的医疗队伍、完善智能医疗审核系统、加强对医疗机构监督的对策,促进DRGs支付方式良性发展并使医疗保障基金能够得到更高效地利用,更好地构建一个高效的医疗支付方式。
Abstract:
In recent years, in order to improve the use efficiency and fairness of medical service resources, China has been exploring new medical payment methods, and gradually developed a mixed payment method based on DRGs payment. This kind of payment method can improve the medical service capacity to a certain extent, so that the medical quality and management level have been improved. From the perspective of game theory, this paper constructs a game model between medical insurance department and medical institution under DRGs system, and concludes that the additional income of medical institution, supervision cost of medical insurance institution and fine level are the influencing factors of game equilibrium. Combined with the results of the game, this paper puts forward the countermeasures of increasing punishment, cultivating high-quality medical teams, improving the intelligent medical audit system and strengthening the supervision of medical institutions, so as to promote the benign development of DRGs payment mode and make the medical security fund be used more efficiently, so as to better build an efficient medical payment mode.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王坚强, 王奕婷. DRG医保支付方式改革对医疗行为的影响[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2021(1): 133-139.
|
|
[2]
|
徐靖. 我国医院推行DRG过程中的成本管理问题和对策研究[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 23(3): 23-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
冯虹, 张玉玺. DRGs试点的住院费用控制效果分析与推行建议[J]. 北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2019, 17(3): 116-124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
徐小平, 于千惠, 邓东宁, 柯冬阁, 蔡晓, 古永红, 林莉, 徐俊, 张新仕. DRGs在医院管理中应用的研究现状[J].卫生经济研究, 2018(5): 66-68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
徐莹波, 吴志伟. DRG付费下打造医保基金安全生态圈的思考[J/OL]. 卫生经济研究, 2021, 38(12): 54-56.
2022-03-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
Erlandsen, E. (2008) Improving the Efficiency of Health Care Spending: What Can Be Learnt from Partial and Selected Analyses of Hospital Performance? OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 1, 1-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Grimaldi, P.L. and Micheletti, J.A. (1982) Diagnosis Related Groups: A Practitioners’ Guide. Pluribus Press, Chicago, 38-41.
|
|
[8]
|
刘璇, 张朋柱, 张敏. 基于两方博弈关系分析的医保制度改进策略研究[J]. 医学与哲学(人文社会医学版), 2007, 28(3): 9-11.
|
|
[9]
|
郭燕莹, 朱光炜. DRGs付费模式下医院医保精细化管理实践[J]. 现代医院, 2021, 21(2): 250-252+256.
|
|
[10]
|
刘超, 李霞, 刘卓慧. 基于DRGs的城市公立医院医疗服务质量评价研究[J]. 宏观质量研究, 2020, 8(2): 42-54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[11]
|
方金鸣, 陶红兵. 基于博弈理论的DRG支付制度对医疗机构诊疗行为影响分析[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2021, 40(3): 5-8.
|
|
[12]
|
方金鸣, 陶红兵. 基于博弈理论的DRG支付制度下医院和医生层面诊疗行为分析[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2021, 40(3): 9-13.
|
|
[13]
|
刘轩. 从博弈论角度分析美国DRGs医疗服务支付方式及其对我国的借鉴意义[J]. 中国国际财经(中英文), 2017(1): 12-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[14]
|
国家医疗保障局发布DRG/DIP支付方式改革三年行动计划[J]. 中国数字医学, 2021, 16(12): 48.
|