社会互动和子女数量对老年人主观幸福感的影响研究——基于CGSS2018的实证分析
Influence of Social Interaction and Number of Children on Subjective Well-Being of the Elderly —Empirical Analysis Based on CGSS2018
DOI: 10.12677/ORF.2022.123094, PDF,   
作者: 赵 维:上海工程技术大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 老年人主观幸福感社会互动子女数量The Elderly Subjective Well-Being Social Interaction Number of Children
摘要: 在现阶段我国经济高速平稳发展和人口老龄化程度严重的背景下,如何切实提升老年群体生活幸福感,越来越多的学者和政府开始重视这个问题。本文以2018年中国综合社会调查数据为基础,运用多元有序回归模型分析社会互动和子女数量对老年人主观幸福感的影响,并得出以下结论:第一,社会互动对老年人的主观幸福感有显著正向影响,高频率的社会互动有利于提升老年人的主观幸福感。第二,子女数量对老年人的主观幸福感有显著积极影响。基于以上的结论,对于如何切实有效地提升老年人的主观幸福感提出了相关建议,一是政府、社会和个人要鼓励老年人积极参与到社会互动中来;二是子女要为老人提供物质和精神支持;三是继续大力推进和完善老年人的继续教育体系。
Abstract: In the context of the rapid and stable development of China’s economy and the serious degree of population aging at the present stage, more and more scholars and governments begin to pay attention to the issue of how to effectively improve the life happiness of the elderly. Based on the data from China Comprehensive Social Survey in 2018, this paper uses multiple ordered regression model to analyze the influence of social interaction and the number of children on the subjective well-being of the elderly, and draws the following conclusions: Firstly, social interaction has a significant positive impact on the subjective well-being of the elderly, and high-frequency social interaction is conducive to improving the subjective well-being of the elderly. Second, the number of children has a significantly positive impact on the subjective well-being of the elderly. Based on the above conclusions, this paper puts forward relevant suggestions on how to effectively improve the subjective well-being of the elderly. First, the government, society and individuals should encourage the elderly to actively participate in social interaction. Second, children should provide material and spiritual support for the elderly. Third, continue to vigorously promote and improve the continuing education system for the elderly.
文章引用:赵维. 社会互动和子女数量对老年人主观幸福感的影响研究——基于CGSS2018的实证分析[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2022, 12(3): 886-895. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2022.123094

参考文献

[1] 张栋. 代际支持、社会网络对老年人生活质量的影响——基于老化态度的中介效应分析[J]. 中国劳动关系学院学报, 2021, 35(3): 15-25.
[2] Dienerand, E., Oishi, S. and Lucas, R.E. (2003) Personality, Culture, and Subjective Wellbeing: Emotional and Cognitive Evaluations of Life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403-425.
[3] Arent, S.M., Landers, D.M. and Etnier, J.L. (2000). The Effects of Exercise on Mood in Older Adults: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 8, 407-430.
[4] 答会明. 中国老年人主观幸福感研究10年: 回顾与展望[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(9): 2288-2294.
[5] 庞海云, 李彦如. 收入水平、养老保险制度与老年人主观幸福感——基于多层线性模型的实证分析[J]. 南方论刊, 2022(3): 46-48.
[6] 封铁英, 刘蓉, 高鑫. 人际关系、活动参与与老年人主观幸福感——基于陕西省养老机构调查实例的分析[J]. 中州学刊, 2020(3): 87-91.
[7] 孙立新, 刘兰兰. 教育会影响老年人主观幸福感吗?——基于教育回报率的实证研究[J]. 开放教育研究, 2020, 26(5): 111-120.
[8] 于晓琳, 陈有国, 曲孝原, 黄希庭. 影响老年人主观幸福感的相关因素[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2016, 30(6): 427-434.
[9] 郑思宁, 王淑琴, 郑逸芳. 子女数量与农村居民幸福感——基于性别和年龄差异视角[J]. 西北人口, 2018, 39(5): 30-38.
[10] 林海波, 刘莉, 王国军. 老年幸福感: “多子多福”合理性的中韩比较研究——基于老年人口追踪调查数据的分析[J]. 社会科学战线, 2018(7): 89-95.
[11] 潘丽, 贾姣杏. 缩小“数字鸿沟”提升“银发族”幸福感——对西安市老年群体智能手机使用现状调查与分析[J]. 新闻前哨, 2022(4): 58-59.
[12] 龙学文, 稂时阳, 徐泽林. 社区公共服务对老年人幸福感的影响[J]. 调研世界, 2022(1): 13-20.
[13] 黄文杰, 吕康银. “退而不休”对老年人主观幸福感的影响——基于CHARLS数据的实证分析[J]. 税务与经济, 2020(3): 22-31.
[14] 林艳, 陈章明. 社会互动与老年人生活满意度相关性研究[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2007, 27(12): 1196-1197.
[15] 姜照君, Nan Yu, 王红漫, 吴志斌, 郭可鑫. 社会资本对老年人生活满意度的影响——基于新冠肺炎疫情期间的调查分析[J]. 卫生软科学, 2021, 35(4): 45-51.
[16] 郭铖. 贫困农民经济地位、社会互动与幸福感——以太行山集中连片特困地区为例[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2020(2): 153-159.