大学生课程学习体验对积极学业情绪的影响：学业自我效能感的中介作用
The Effect of Course Experience on Positive Academic Emotions of College Students: The Mediating Role of Academic Self-Efficacy
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.128316, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王 松, 林 烽, 万永利, 陈 亚, 李 凌*：电子科技大学生命科学与技术学院，四川 成都；王春燕：成都医学院教务处，四川 成都
关键词: 课程学习体验；学业自我效能感；积极学业情绪；中介作用；大学生；Course Experience； Academic Self-Efficacy； Positive Academic Emotions； Mediating Effect； College Students
摘要: 目的：探讨大学生课程学习体验与积极学业情绪之间的关系，以及学业自我效能感在其中的中介作用。方法：采用大学生课程学习体验问卷、大学生一般学业情绪问卷和学业自我效能感问卷对352名大学生进行问卷调查。结果：大学生的积极学业情绪在毕业选择(t = 2.94, p < 0.01)、年级(F = 3.68, p < 0.05)、学业成绩(F = 17.76, p < 0.001)上差异显著。大学生课程学习体验正向预测学业自我效能感(β = 0.632, p < 0.001)和积极学业情绪(β = 0.603, p < 0.001)，学业自我效能感正向预测积极学业情绪(β = 0.486, p < 0.001)；学业自我效能感在课程学习体验与积极学业情绪之间起部分中介作用，中介效应占总效应的50.91%。结论：课程学习体验不仅直接影响积极学业情绪，而且可以通过学业自我效能感的中介作用间接影响大学生积极学业情绪。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the relationship among course experience, positive academic emotions and academic self-efficacy. Methods: A total of 352 college students were investigated by Course Experience Questionnaire, College Student General Academic Emotion Questionnaire and Academic Self-efficacy Questionnaire. Results: The positive academic emotions of college students in graduation choice (t = 2.94, p < 0.01), grade (F = 3.68, p < 0.05), academic achievement (F = 17.76, p < 0.001). Course experience positively predicted academic self-efficacy (β = 0.632, p < 0.001) and positive academic emotions (β = 0.603, p < 0.001), academic self-efficacy positively predicted positive academic emotions (β = 0.486, p < 0.001); Academic self-efficacy played a partial mediating role between course experience and positive academic emotions, accounting for 50.91% of the total effect. Conclusion: Course experience not only directly affects the positive academic emotions but also indirectly affects the positive academic emotions of college students through the mediating effect of academic self-efficacy.
文章引用：王松, 王春燕, 林烽, 万永利, 陈亚, 李凌 (2022). 大学生课程学习体验对积极学业情绪的影响：学业自我效能感的中介作用. 心理学进展, 12(8), 2654-2662. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.128316

参考文献

[1] 边玉芳(2004). 学习自我效能感量表的编制. 心理科学, 27(5), 1218-1222.
[2] 蔡文伯, 杨丽雪(2019). 少数民族大学生学业自我效能感、学习策略与学业成就的关系研究. 民族教育研究, 30(1), 83-90.
[3] 储璧茜(2011). 学生学习效能感的功效及其心理培养策略. 教学与管理, (12), 96-97.
[4] 龚少英, 韩雨丝, 王丽霞, 高雷, 熊俊梅(2016). 任务价值和学业情绪与网络学习满意度的关系研究. 电化教育研究, 37(3), 72-77.
[5] 郭建鹏, 计国君(2019). 大学生学习体验与学习结果的关系: 学生投入的中介作用. 心理科学, 42(4), 868-875.
[6] 胡路伟(2021). 大学生在线课程学习与行为意愿的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, 29(4), 619-624.
[7] 李洁, 宋尚桂(2013). 大学生学业自我效能感、学业情绪与学习适应性. 中国健康心理学杂志, 21(9), 1429-1431.
[8] 梁宇颂(2000). 大学生成就目标、归因方式与学业自我效能感的研究. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[9] 林杰, 刘衍玲, 彭文波(2020). 大学生学业情绪与学习投入的关系: 学业自我效能感的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (4), 89-96.
[10] 林亚萍, 范泽平, 武任恒(2017). 大学生积极心理资本和学业情绪的关系. 内江师范学院学报, 32(4), 6-11.
[11] 刘贤伟,马星(2015). 学业自我效能感与学生课程满意度的关系——学生课程体验的中介作用. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 28(1), 116-120.
[12] 卢曼萍, 简小珠(2021). 我国大学生“学业特权”的表现特征及影响因素. 教育学术月刊, (5), 78-84.
[13] 陆根书(2013). 大学生的课程学习经历、学习方式与教学质量满意度的关系分析. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 33(2), 96-103.
[14] 陆根书, 李丽洁(2020). 大学生课程学习经历: 测量工具设计与基本特征分析——基于陕西高校2018届本科毕业生调查数据的分析. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 38(11), 78-89.
[15] 马惠霞(2008). 大学生一般学业情绪问卷的编制. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(6), 594-596.
[16] 乔旭(2017). 大学生学业拖延、自我和谐和学业情绪的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 福州: 福建师范大学.
[17] 邵娟(2009). 大学生课程体验调查法的应用研究. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[18] 孙芳萍, 陈传锋(2010). 学业情绪与学业成绩的关系及其影响因素研究. 心理科学, 33(1), 204-206.
[19] 王定华(2020). 世界格局变革下我国本科教育发展的若干方略. 教育研究, 41(8), 85-95.
[20] 王莉华, 高源月(2021). 研究型大学研究生成就目标定向与学业拖延——学业自我效能感的中介效应. 研究生教育研究, 63(3), 26-34.
[21] 王纾(2012). 中美研究型大学本科课程教学的比较研究: 以学生课程学习体验为视角. 外国教育研究, 39(4), 111-119.
[22] 王伟, 雷雳, 王兴超(2016). 大学生主动性人格对学业成绩的影响: 学业自我效能感和学习适应的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 32(5), 579-586.
[23] 王小新, 苗晶磊(2012). 大学生学业自我效能感、自尊与学习倦怠关系研究. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 255(1), 192-196.
[24] 吴世珍, 孙百才(2021). 疫情背景下学生适应能力对学习投入的影响: 学业情绪的中介效应. 当代教育科学, (8), 87-95.
[25] 谢莉, 杨海涛, 张玲玲, 郑旭(2020). 学业准备对大学生学业收获的影响——人际互动与学业自我效能感的中介作用. 教育学报, 16(1), 83-91.
[26] 徐立清, 崔彦群, 郝丹(2020). 高校课程学习体验评价研究述评及展望. 中国大学教学, (10), 87-91+96.
[27] 袁耀宗(2010). 澳大利亚大学生课程体验调查研究. 硕士学位论文, 长沙: 湖南师范大学.
[28] 张春梅, 刘华山, 陈京军, 等(2017). 先前学业成就与学习动机、策略的关系: 学业情绪的中介作用. 心理科学, 40(6), 1365-1371.
[29] 张世晶, 黎嘉焮, 张旭东(2016). 大学生学业情绪现状及其与积极心理品质的关系. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), (5), 218-222.
[30] 赵淑媛, 蔡太生, 陈志坚(2012). 大学生学业情绪及与学业成绩的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(3), 398-400.
[31] 赵淑媛, 陈志坚(2022). 大学生自我效能感对积极学业情绪和成就目标定向的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 30(1), 156-160.
[32] 周蕾, 史秋衡(2021). 大学生课堂体验对学习成果的影响研究. 江苏高教, (12), 95-99.
[33] Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.[CrossRef] 
[34] Chemers, M. M., Hu, L. T., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic Self-Efficacy and First Year College Student Performance and Adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 55-64.[CrossRef] 
[35] Diseth, A. (2007). Approaches to Learning, Course Experience and Examination Grade among Undergraduate Psychology Students: Testing of Mediator Effects and Construct Validity. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 373-388.[CrossRef] 
[36] Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology: The Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions, American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.[CrossRef] 
[37] Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between Academic Self-Efficacy, Learning-Related Emotions, and Metacognitive Learning Strategies with Academic Performance in Medical Students: A Structural Equation Model. BMC Medical Education, 20, Article No. 76.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. The Guilford Press.
[39] Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The Influence of Academic Self-Efficacy on Academic Performance: A Systematic Review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63-84.[CrossRef] 
[40] Lazarides, R., & Raufelder, D. (2021). Control-Value Theory in the Context of Teaching: Does Teaching Quality Moderate Relations between Academic Self-Concept and Achievement Emotions? The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 127-147.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Liu, R. D., Zhen, R., Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Jiang, R., & Xu, L. (2018). Teacher Support and Math Engagement: Roles of Academic Self-Efficacy and Positive Emotions. Educational Psychology, 38, 3-16.[CrossRef] 
[42] Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University Students’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for Theory and Practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27-52.[CrossRef] 
[43] Pekrun, R. (2006). The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341.[CrossRef] 
[44] Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, P. R. (2002). Academic Emotions in Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-105.[CrossRef] 
[45] Putwain, D., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2013). Academic Self-Efficacy in Study-Related Skills and Behaviours: Relations with Learning-Related Emotions and Academic Success. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 633-650.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of Academic Departments on Students’ Approaches to Studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368-383.[CrossRef] 
[47] Reschly, A. L., Huebner, E. S., Appleton, J. J, & Antaramian, S. (2008). Engagement as Flourishing: the Contribution of Positive Emotions and Coping to Adolescents’ Engagement at School and with Learning. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 419-431.[CrossRef] 
[48] Wang, Y., Cao, Y., Gong S., Wang, Z., Li, N., & Ai, L. (2022). Interaction and Learning Engagement in Online Learning: The Mediating Roles of Online Learning Self-Efficacy and Academic Emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 94, Article ID: 102128.[CrossRef] 
[49] Yin, H., & Wang W. (2015). Assessing and Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Teaching in China: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 1032-1049.[CrossRef] 
[50] Zajacova, A., Lynch, S. M., & Espenshade, T. J. (2005). Self-Efficacy, Stress, and Academic Success in College. Research in Higher Education, 46, 677-706.[CrossRef]