英汉非常规双及物结构的认知对比研究
A Cognitive Contrastive Study of Unconventional Ditransitive Structures in English and Chinese
摘要: 本文将概念整合理论和语法转喻理论作为理论基础，以非常规双及物结构的非典型特征为出发点，分析和比较了英汉非常规双及物结构的认知特点。结合LancsBox自带的LCMC中文语料库和Brown英文语料库分析得知，中英文非常规双及物结构一般具备以下特点：1) 在SNOT-HUMAN + VGIVE + ObjINTENDED + Obj2THING中，非生命主语以集体名词为主，其次是抽象名词，其中，英文非生命主语的数量多于汉语非生命主语的数量。2) 在SHUMAN + VNOT-GIVE + ObjINTENDED + Obj2THING中的非典型传递谓词均多于典型传递谓词，但英文非常规双及物结构中非典型传递谓词数量较多于中文。3) 在SNOT-HUMAN + VGIVE + ObjNOT-INTENDED + Obj2THING中，非生命主语的类型包括集体名词、抽象名词和物质名词。除此之外，非常规双及物结构除了体现了概念整合和语法转喻相结合的认知机制以外，还得益于该结构在认知上具有的经济性和体验性。
Abstract: Taking conceptual integration theory and grammatical metonymy theory as the theoretical basis, this paper analyzes and contrasts the cognitive characteristics of unconventional ditransitive structures in English and Chinese from the perspective of atypical characteristics of unconventional ditransitive structures. Combining the LCMC Chinese corpus and the Brown English corpus, we know that unconventional ditransitive structures in Chinese and English generally have the following characteristics: 1) in the construction of SNOT-HUMAN + VGIVE + ObjINTENDED + Obj2THING, the non-life subjects are mostly collective nouns, and the number of abstract nouns is lower than that of collective nouns. The number of English non-human subjects is greater than that of Chinese. 2) The number of atypical transitive predicates in SHUMAN + VNOT-GIVE + ObjINTENDED + Obj2THING is more than that in typical transitive predicates. But the number of atypical transitive predicates in English unconventional ditransitive structure is more than that in Chinese. 3) In SNOT-HUMAN + VGIVE + ObjNOT-INTENDED + Obj2THING, the inanimate subject includes not only collective nouns and abstract nouns, but also material nouns representing concrete things. Moreover, Unconventional ditransitive structure not only embodies the cognitive mechanism of the combination of conceptual integration and grammatical metonymy, but also benefits from the economy of the syntactic structure and the experience of meaning interpretation.
文章引用：曾芳缘. 英汉非常规双及物结构的认知对比研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2022, 10(8): 1619-1627. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2022.108218

参考文献

[1] Goldberg, E. (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] 徐盛桓. 相邻关系视角下的双及物句再研究[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2007, 39(4): 253-260.
[3] 熊学亮. 增效构式与非增效构式: 从Goldberg 的两个定义说起[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2009, 41(5): 323-328.
[4] 张跃伟. 非常规双及物句式生成的认知动因——基于“动词句式双向互动”视角[J]. 外语教学, 2015, 36(5): 31-34.
[5] 申小阳. 英汉非常规双及物结构的构式语法阐释[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 41(2): 156-161.
[6] Goldberg, A.E. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[7] Brezina, P. and McEnery, T. (2015) Who Benefits When Discourse Gets Democratized? Analysing a Twitter Corpus around the British Benefits Street Debate. In: Baker, P. and McEnery, T., Eds., Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 244-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Brezina, V. (2016) Collocation Networks. In: Baker, P. and Egbert, J., Eds., Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research, Routledge, New York, 90-107.
[9] Marín, M.J. (2017) Legalese as Seen through the Lens of Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction to Software Tools for Terminological Analysis. International Journal of Language & Law (JLL), 6, 18-45.
[10] Germond, B. and Ha, F.W. (2019) Climate Change and Maritime Security Narrative: The Case of the International Maritime Organization. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 9, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 刘美君, 杨佳铭. 陶瓷文本中特殊的修辞策略[J]. 当代修辞学, 2020(2): 24-35.
[12] 王磊, 周乔. 能源话语与美国国内政治博弈——基于话语-历史分析法的特朗普能源话语策略分析[J]. 中国石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 37(1): 36-45.
[13] Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M.B. (1998) Blending as a Central Process of Grammar: Expanded Version. In: Goldberg, A., Ed., Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, 113-130.
[14] Fauconnier, G. and Sweetser, E. (1996) Spaces, Worlds and Grammar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[15] Mandelblit, N. (1997) Grammatical Blending: Creative and Schematic Aspects in Sentence Processing and Translation. University of California, San Diego.
[16] Mandelblit, N. (2000) The Grammatical Marking of Conceptual Integration: from Syntax to Morphology. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 197-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] 何爱晶. 名动转类的认知理据与外语学习研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2013.