论国家减排责任的分配:环境容量的视角
On the Allocation of National Responsibility for Emission Reduction: The Perspective of Environmental Capacity
DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2022.124092, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 许胜晴, 徐文艺, 缪 凡, 方瑞琪:江苏海洋大学文法学院,江苏 连云港
关键词: 气候变化环境容量减排责任Climate Change Environmental Capacity Emission Reduction Responsibility
摘要: 气候变化问题是人类面临的重要环境挑战。国际社会对于应对气候变化逐渐形成共识,但是在具体的减排机制上存在一定争议。目前关于气候变化责任的分担尚缺乏合理的标准提供公平的解决方案。本文基于自然资源的概念和科斯定理,提出将环境容量作为国家管辖范围内的自然资源,从而突破环境容量公共品属性的局限。环境容量的资源属性具有客观基础,而且国际法关于国家资源主权的理念也可以为从资源主权的角度划分国家减排责任提供理论支持。以环境容量为基础形成国家减排责任机制将有利于气候变化责任法公平划分,为建立更为明确的减排框架提供权利基础。
Abstract: Climate change is an important environmental challenge facing mankind. The international com-munity has gradually formed a consensus on addressing climate change, but there are some dis-putes on the specific emission reduction mechanism. At present, there is still a lack of reasonable standards for the sharing of responsibility for climate change to provide a fair solution. Based on the concept of natural resources and Coase theorem, this paper proposes to take environmental capacity as natural resources within the scope of national jurisdiction, so as to break through the limitations of public goods attribute of environmental capacity. The resource attribute of envi-ronmental capacity has an objective basis and the concept of national resource sovereignty in in-ternational law can provide theoretical support for the division of national responsibility of emis-sion reduction from the perspective of resource sovereignty. The establishment of national emission reduction liability mechanism based on environmental capacity will facilitate the fair division of climate change liability law and provide rights basis for the establishment of a more clear emission reduction framework.
文章引用:许胜晴, 徐文艺, 缪凡, 方瑞琪. 论国家减排责任的分配:环境容量的视角[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2022, 12(4): 742-746. https://doi.org/10.12677/AEP.2022.124092

参考文献

[1] 邵莉莉. 碳中和背景下国际碳排放治理的“共同责任”构建——共同但有区别责任的困境及消解[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(2): 30-43.
[2] 姚晓娜, 唐甜. 再议气候正义中的历史责任追究——历史责任的界定、合理与限度[J]. 阅江学刊, 2018, 10(4): 46-55+144.
[3] 张祥伟. 气候变化领域区别责任分配标准之探析[J]. 鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 32(1): 69-73+85.
[4] 徐祥民, 李宇斐. “能者多劳”——应对气候变化责任分担的首要原则[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2012(3): 31-34+158.
[5] 吕霞. 《气候变化框架公约》中的应对气候变化责任原则解析[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2012(3): 55-59+159.
[6] 莫志宏. 科斯定理与初始权利的界定——关于初始权利界定的法与经济学[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2008(5): 112-122+159.
[7] 吴健, 马中. 科斯定理对排污权交易政策的理论贡献[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004(3): 21-25.
[8] Lasse Ringius, Asbjørn Torvangerand, Bjart Holtsmark. (1998) Can Multi-Criteria Rules Fairly Distribute Climate Burdens?——OECD Results from Three Burden Sharing Rules. Energy Policy, 26, 777-793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] FAO (1986) Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific As-pects of Marine Pollution: An Approach to Marine Pollution Prevention. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
[10] 欧阳志云, 王如松, 赵景柱. 生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(5): 635-640.
[11] 张雪英, 黎颖治. 生态系统服务功能与可持续发展[J]. 生态科学, 2004(3): 286-288.
[12] 胡德胜, 主编. 环境与资源保护法学[M]. 郑州: 郑州大学出版社, 2010.