富含有害气体地层长距离大埋深盾构穿越隧道接缝防气性能试验研究
Experimental Study on Gas-Proof Performance of Shield Crossing Tunnel Joints with Long Distance and Large Embedded Depth in Stratum Rich in Harmful Gases
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2022.128101, PDF,   
作者: 侯 宇, 王成林, 王 岳:国家管网集团建设项目管理分公司,河北 廊坊;薛 飞, 张 磊:中国石油天然气管道工程有限公司,河北 廊坊;洪 叶:同济大学土木工程学院,上海
关键词: 盾构隧道管片接缝密封垫模型试验防气性能含气地层Shield Tunnels Segment Joint Gasket Model Test Gas-Proof Performance Gas-Bearing Strata
摘要: 中俄东线天然气管道工程为长距离(10.23 km)、大埋深(40 m)长江盾构隧道穿越工程,经勘察其地层富含沼气等有害气体,有害气体的存在给项目施工和运营带来了巨大的安全隐患,对隧道接缝防气也提出了较高要求。本文设计了与实际隧道沟槽和密封垫高度和宽度等尺寸相同的内外两圈回型密封垫垫圈、带沟槽混凝土构件及预埋管道构成的模型试验装置,对不同工况下本穿越工程设计弹性密封垫的防气性能进行了直接测试和研究。试验结果表明,盾构外道密封垫在张开量5.6 mm、错缝量15 mm时,短期防气能力为2.03 MPa;在0.125 MPa较低气压的作用下,能测到微弱的气体泄漏。结合国内类似地层和工程的有害气体最高气压测量值等调研分析,可以判断在满足设计的张开、错缝验收标准情形下,本工程盾构隧道接缝具有足够的抵抗高压有害气体快速逸出或爆发式逸出的能力;但是,低气压下隧道接缝微弱泄漏的试验结果表明,需要警惕长期微泄漏情况下隧道内气体浓度累积带来的风险和危害,提前制定针对性的、切实可行的管控措施以保障施工与运营安全。
Abstract: The China-Russia eastern gas pipeline project is a long-distance (10.23 km), deeply buried (40 m) Yangtze River shield tunnel crossing project. It has been surveyed that its stratum is rich in harmful gases such as biogas. The existence of harmful gases has brought huge safety hazards to the construction and operation of the project, and higher requirements have been put forward for the gas-proof performance of tunnel joints. In this paper, a model test device consisting of two loops of inner and outer gaskets with the same dimensions as the actual tunnel groove and gasket height and width, concrete members with grooves, and embedded pipelines is designed. We conducted direct testing and research on the gas-proof performance of the elastic gasket designed for the project under different working conditions. The test results show that the short-term gas-proof capacity of the shield tunnel outer gasket is 2.03 MPa when the opening amount is 5.6 mm and the staggered seam amount is 15 mm; under the action of the lower pressure of 0.125 MPa, weak gas leakage can be detected. Combined with the investigation and analysis of the highest pressure measurement value of harmful gases in similar stratums and projects in China, it can be judged that under the condition of meeting the design acceptance criteria for opening and staggered seams, the joints of the shield tunnels project have sufficient resistance to the rapid or explosive escape of high-pressure harmful gases; however, the test results of the weak leakage of tunnel joints under low air pressure show that it is necessary to be alert to the risks and hazards caused by the accumulation of gas concentration in the tunnel under the condition of long-term micro leakage, and to formulate targeted and feasible control measures in advance to ensure construction and operation safety.
文章引用:侯宇, 薛飞, 王成林, 洪叶, 王岳, 张磊. 富含有害气体地层长距离大埋深盾构穿越隧道接缝防气性能试验研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2022, 12(8): 1048-1057. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2022.128101

参考文献

[1] 高健, 粟玉英, 丁淑平. 浅层有害气体对地铁的影响及应对措施[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2014, 28(4): 587-590.
[2] 冯铭璋, 季军. 上海地区浅层气地质灾害评估[J]. 上海地质, 2006, 100(4): 44-47.
[3] 唐益群, 刘冰洋, 赵书凯, 等. 高压沼气对浅部砂质粉土工程性质的影响[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 32(10): 1316-1319.
[4] 孔令伟, 郭爱国, 陈守义, 等. 浅层天然气井喷对地层的损伤影响与桩基工程危害分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2004, 24(4): 375-381.
[5] 马积薪. 盾构隧道瓦斯爆炸事故的原因及对策——东京都水道局输水管道工程[J]. 世界隧道, 1995(6): 64-73.
[6] 周殷康, 阎长虹, 李学乾, 等. 第四系全新统软土地层中浅层气空间分布及其控灾特征[J]. 工程勘察, 2016, 44(5): 17-20+25.
[7] 李萍, 杜军, 刘乐军, 等. 我国近海海底浅层气分布特征[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2010, 21(1): 69-74.
[8] Rad, N.S., Vianna, A.J.D. and Berre, T. (1994) Gas in Soils. II: Effect of Gas on Undrained Static and Cyclic Strength of Sand. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120, 716-736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 丁智, 郑海洋, 冯丛烈, 等. 含气土工程特性研究现状综述及展望[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(4): 537-553.
[10] 郭爱国, 沈林冲, 张金荣, 等. 浅层气对杭州地铁施工的影响模式分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2010, 27(9): 78-81.
[11] 唐益群, 叶为民, 张庆贺. 长江口软土层中沼气与隧道安全施工技术研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 1996(4): 465-470.
[12] 卢浩, 王明洋, 戎晓力, 等. 含气地层中气体释放对盾构隧道稳定性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(S1): 301-306.
[13] 孙昕, 武威, 焦亚基, 等. 盾构隧道管片接缝气密性模拟方法与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(2): 375-382.
[14] Wheeler, S.J. (1988) A Conceptual Model for Soils Containing Large Gas Bubbles. Géotechnique, 38, 389-397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 王晖皓, 叶斌, 涂新斌, 等. 含气地层不均匀沉降对盾构隧道结构影响的固-液-气耦合分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(6): 2487-2494.
[16] Feng, X.Q., Ye, B., Zhang, X.Y., et al. (2021) Analysis of the Effects of Shallow Gas on a Shield Tunnel during Leakage: A Case Study from the Sutong River-Crossing GIL Utility Tunnel Project in China. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 25, 2285-2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 梁立刚, 林兴贵, 骆汉宾. 盾构隧道穿越沼气地层风险识别与控制[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2015, 32(1): 65-71.
[18] 唐益群, 蒋玉坤. 隧道施工中浅层沼气的危害与防治[J]. 施工技术, 2011, 40(20): 44-45+49.
[19] 闫治平, 黄淑英. 漏率与压力关系的研究[J]. 中国空间科学技术, 1999(2): 44-48.
[20] 任晓. 三维粗糙表面的表征及其气体密封性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2009.
[21] Chapman, S. and Cowling, T.G. (1970) The Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Gases: An Account of the Kinetic Theory of Viscosity, Thermal Conduction and Diffusion in Gases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[22] Woods, L.C. (1993) An Introduction to the Kinetic Theory of Gases and Magnetoplasmas. Oxford University Press, Oxford.