福建省公立中小学智慧课堂项目采购之综合评分指标建置——一种基于DEMATEL-ANP的混合方法
A Study on Developing Evaluation Indicators in the Best Value Approach for Procurement of Smart Classrooms in the Public Primary and Secondary Schools in Fujian—A Hybrid Approach Based on DEMATEL-ANP
摘要: 本研究先以模糊德尔菲技术从福建省财政厅政府采购监督管理办公室于2017年7月至2021年12月期间公布的福建省政府采购货物和服务项目公开招标文件中筛选出三个一级指标与十个二级指标,再以DEMATEL-ANP方法计算指标权重系数,以供公立中小学智慧课堂项目采购之评标作业参考。研究发现,传统的综合评分法存在轻视“商务项”以及轻信厂家提供的“技术参数”之现象;评委组认为三个一级指标的权重值应相近;评委组最为重视的二级评审指标系“技术参数响应情况”与“总体技术方案”,而对“厂商的过往项目经验”与“对接福建省教育资源公共服务平台”等指标过于轻视。对此,提出三点建议:1) 加强教育信息化产品检验与鉴定业务的政府监管力量,全面构建智慧课堂检验鉴定监管与廉政监督体系;2) 废弃由各级教育行政部门自行制定智慧课堂建设标准之传统做法,邀请教育信息化头部企业之经验产品经理、工程师以及曾使用智能课堂之一线教师连同学院派专家共同参与国家统一规范的智慧课堂建设标准;3) 邀请智慧课堂厂商中具丰富经验之产品经理指导采购单位的需求萃取,以提升采购需求之理性。
Abstract: In this study, three first-level indicators and ten second-level indicators were screened by using Fuzzy Delphi technology from the public bidding documents of Fujian Provincial government procurement of goods and services, released by the Government Procurement Supervision and Administration Office of Fujian Provincial Finance Department from July, 2017, to December, 2021. Then DEMATEL-ANP was used to calculate the weight of the criteria and their causal relationship, so as to provide reference contributions for bid evaluation of smart-classroom-project procurement in public primary and secondary schools. This study found that the traditional Best Value Approach ignores the “business item” and over-trusts the “technical parameters” provided by manufacturers. The bid specialists believe that the weight values of the three first-level indicators should be similar, and the criteria of the matching degree of technical parameters and the overall technical scheme are attached of the most important while the criteria of the manufacturer’s experience with past projects and docking with Fujian Province education resources public service platform are highly ignored. Therefore, the following three improvement measures might be considered and implemented, which are: 1) To strengthen the government supervision of the inspection and appraisal business of educational informatization products to comprehensively construct a clean supervision system of smart classroom inspection; 2) To abandon the traditional practice that the education administrative departments at all levels make the standards of smart classroom construction by the different level government and meanwhile invite the experienced product managers, engineers and front-line teachers who have designed or used smart classrooms to participate in the national unified standard of smart classroom construction along with academic experts; 3) To invite experienced product managers from smart classroom manufacturers to guide the extraction of needs of smart classrooms, so as to help make rational purchases for smart classrooms construction.
文章引用:陈仰平. 福建省公立中小学智慧课堂项目采购之综合评分指标建置——一种基于DEMATEL-ANP的混合方法[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2022, 12(3): 1052-1063. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2022.123111

参考文献

[1] 穆素婚, 吴可增, 刘彤. 技术招标与投标[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 1989.
[2] 卢建昌, 裴乐萍. 基于ISM与G-ANP的建设项目评标方法研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2014, 34(2): 31-35.
[3] 孙宏才, 徐关尧, 田平. 网络层次分析法在桥梁工程招标中的应用[J]. 解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 6(1): 58-62.
[4] 陈光冲, 郑磊, 许俊杰. 建设单位人员项目管理能力评价研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2016, 30(2): 17-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 赵田, 张倩. 基于ANP的水运工程EPC项目评标办法的应用研究[J]. 港工技术, 2017, 54(6): 75-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 郝建新, 尹贻林. 美国政府投资工程管理研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2003(3): 91-92.
[7] Friedman, L.A. (1956) A Competitive Bidding Strategy. Operations Research, 4, 104-112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 徐源裕, 郑绍材, 余文德, 张宪宽, 王国武. 以历史投标资料辅助异质采购决标模式分析之研究[J]. 技术学刊, 2019, 34(4): 173-185.
[9] Banwell, C.H. (1964). Placing and Manage-ment of Contracts for Building and Civil Engineering Work. H.M.S.O., London.
[10] Merna, A. and Smith, N.J. (1990) Bid Evaluation for UK Public Sector Construction Contracts. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 88, 91-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Yu, W.D. and Wang, K.W. (2012) Best Value or Lowest Bid? A Quantitative Perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138, 128-134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 赵春锋, 戴春兰, 张茵茵, 刘清振. 浅析层次分析法在评标过程中的应用[J]. 中国招标, 2019(30): 29-32.
[13] Trybus, M. (2006) Improving the Efficiency of Public Procurement Systems in the Context of the European Union Enlargement Process. Public Contract Law Journal, 35, 409-425.
[14] 赵修华, 陈衍宏. 人力派遣采购最有利标评选项目与权重之研究[J]. 中国行政评论, 2015, 21(1): 55-75.
[15] Akintoye, A., Hardcastle, C., Beck, M., Chinyio, E. and Asenova, D. (2003) Achieving Best Value in Pri-vate Finance Initiative Project Procurement. Construction Management and Economics, 21, 461-470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 雷蕾, 谭跃进. 招标评标方法的适用性研究[J]. 空军工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 4(3): 87-91.
[17] 谭世海, 段磊, 黎亮. 基于AHP/模糊综合评价法的电子政务项目评标方法研究[J]. 项目管理技术, 2013, 11(10): 100-103.
[18] Mustafa, M.A. and Ryan, T.C. (1990) Decision Sup-port for Bid Evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 8, 230-235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Holt, G.D., Olomolaiye, P.O. and Harris, F.C. (1994) Incorporating Project Specific Criteria and Client Utility into the Evaluation of Construction Tenderers. Building Research and Information, 22, 214-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Singh, D. and Robert, L.K. (2005) A Fuzzy Decision Framework for Contractor Selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131, 62-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Deshmukh, A.J. and Chaudhari, A.A. (2011) A Review for Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods. In: Shah, K., Lakshmi Gorty, V.R. and Phirke, A., Eds., Technology Systems and Management: Communications in Computer and Information Science, Springer, Berlin, 283-291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Dickson, G.W. (1966) An Analysis of Vendor Selection Sys-tems and Decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2, 5-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Weber, C.A., Current, J.R. and Benton, W.C. (1991) Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Stevic, Z. (2017) Criteria for Supplier Selection: A Literature Review. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Enterprise Applications, 19, 23-27.
[25] 张绍勋. 模糊多准则评估法及统计[M]. 台北: 五南图书出版, 2012: 362.
[26] Dzeng, R.J. and Wen, K.S. (2005) Evaluating Project Teaming Strategies for Construction of Taipei 101 Using Resource-Based Theory. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 483-491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] 徐慧民, 卫万明, 蔡佩真. 应用分析网络程序法于建设公司住宅企划方案优先级选择之研究[J]. 建筑学报, 2007(62): 49-74.
[28] Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] 刘锋, 卢俊丞, 敖细平. 综合评分法评分标准中技术和商务部分分值如何设置? [J]. 中国招标, 2019(38): 42-43.
[30] 郑梅清. 对政府采购领域“低于成本价”的思考[J]. 中国政府采购, 2020(1): 47-53.
[31] 东山县政府采购中心. 东山县文昌初级中学智慧教室及智慧课堂教学设备采购项目货物类采购项目[EB/OL]. 2020-08-05. http://140.237.73.6/upload/document/20200805/98f315bd45d44f69b132d04d9d26bf5e.html, 2022-06-15.