对社交焦虑大学生“线上 + 线下”混合式心理干预

“Online + Offline” Hybrid Psychological Intervention for College Students with Social Anxiety

摘要: 目的：探讨“线上 + 线下”的认知行为训练在社交焦虑大学生中的应用效果。方法：研究对象为被社交焦虑困扰的大学生103人，将其分为三组(实验组一34人、实验组二34人、对照组35人)。采用“线上 + 线下”的模式干预实验组一，采用“线下”的单一模式干预实验组二，对照组不进行任何干预。本研究使用人际交往焦虑量表(IAS)和线上社交焦虑量表(SADS)测量被试干预前后的社交焦虑水平。结果：干预前，三组的IAS得分和SADS得分无显著差异(F_IAS(1, 2) = 0.06, p > 0.05; F_SADS(1, 2) = 0.82, p > 0.05)。对三组进行干预后，与干预前相比，三组的IAS和SADS得分均有显著差异，其中实验组一和实验组二后测得分显著小于前测得分t_{IAS线上＋线下}(1, 2) = 4.62，p < 0.01；t_{SADS线上＋线下}(1, 2) = 3.5，p < 0.01；t_IAS线下(1, 2) = 3.39，p < 0.01；t _SADS线下(1, 2) = 1.42，p > 0.05，而对照组后测得分显著高于前测(t_IAS对照(1, 2) = −4.68, p < 0.01; t_SADS对照(1, 2) = −4.04, p < 0.05)，且实验组一的IAS得分和SADS得分显著低于实验组二和对照组(F_IAS(1, 2) = 32.83, p < 0.01; F_SADS(1, 2) = 12.35, p < 0.01)。结论：“线上 + 线下”混合式团体辅导较单一线下干预更有利于降低社交焦虑水平。

Abstract: Objective: To explore the application effect of “online + offline” cognitive behavioral training in socially anxious college students. Methods: The research subjects were 103 college students who were troubled by social anxiety, and they were divided into three groups (experimental group 1, 34 people, experimental group 2, 34 people, and control group, 35 people). The “online + offline” model was used to intervene in the experimental group 1, the “offline” single model was used to intervene in the experimental group 2, and the control group did not receive any intervention. This study used the Interpersonal Anxiety Scale (IAS) and the Online Social Anxiety Scale (SADS) to measure the subjects’ social anxiety levels before and after the intervention. Results: Before intervention, there was no significant difference in IAS score and SADS score among the three groups (F_IAS(1,2) = 0.06, p > 0.05; F_SADS (1, 2) = 0.82, p > 0.05). After the intervention of the three groups, compared with before the intervention, the IAS and SADS scores of the three groups were significantly different, and the post-test scores of the experimental group 1 and the experimental group 2 were significantly lower than the pre-test scores t_{IASonline + offline}(1, 2) = 4.62, p < 0.01; t_{SADSonline + offline}(1,2) = 3.5, p < 0.01; t_IASoffline(1,2) = 3.39, p < 0.01; tSADS offline(1,2) = 1.42, p > 0.05, while the post-test score of the control group was significantly higher than the pre-test (t _IAScontrol(1,2) = −4.68, p < 0.01; t_{SADS control}(1,2) = −4.04, p < 0.05; t_{IAS control} (1, 2) = −4.68, p < 0.01; t_{SADS control}(1, 2) = −4.04, p < 0.05), and the IAS and SADS scores of experimental group 1 were significantly lower than those of experimental group 2 and control group (F_IAS(1, 2) = 32.83, p < 0.01; F_SADS(1, 2) = 12.35, p < 0.01). Conclusion: “Online + offline” mixed group counseling is more conducive to reducing the level of social anxiety than single offline intervention.