财产犯罪的刑民关系分析——以权利外观理论为出发点
Analysis of the Criminal-Civil Relationship of Property Crimes—The Appearance of Rights Theory as a Starting Point
摘要: 通常认为,民法中的权利归属是认定财产犯罪的前提:在民法中,当行为人利用虚假权利外观,致使第三人在善意时,基于正当信赖支付对价而取得相关财产之所有权时,权利外观理论发挥着保护善意第三人之作用,使其“屏蔽”原权利人之追索而丧失取得之所有权。换言之,其使原财产权利人承担不利后果。在刑法中,刑民判断的侧重点不同,财产犯罪被害人以及行为的认定应回归刑法本体的处理,而不必采取权利外观理论作为判断要素,对法秩序统一性不应当极端化。
Abstract: It is generally accepted that the attribution of rights in civil law is a prerequisite for the identification of property offences: in civil law, the doctrine of appearance of rights serves to protect bona fide third parties by “shielding” them from the original owner’s claims when the perpetrator uses a false ap-pearance of rights to obtain ownership of the property in good faith, based on the payment of con-sideration in justifiable reliance. The doctrine of the appearance of rights serves to protect bona fide third parties by “shielding” them from the claims of the original owner and forfeiting the acquired title. In other words, it exposes the original owner of the property to adverse consequences. In criminal law, the focus of criminal and civil judgement is different, and the identification of victims of property crime and conduct should be returned to the treatment of criminal law proper, without the need to adopt the appearance of rights doctrine as an element of judgement, and the uniformity of the legal order should not be polarised.
文章引用:哈明悦. 财产犯罪的刑民关系分析——以权利外观理论为出发点[J]. 争议解决, 2022, 8(3): 463-469. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2022.83062

参考文献

[1] 刘保玉, 郭栋. 权利外观保护理论及其在我国民法典中的设计[J]. 法律科学, 2012, 30(5): 61-69.
[2] 庄加园. 动产善意取得的理论基础再审视——基于权利外观学说的建构尝试[J]. 中外法学, 2016(5): 1346-1366.
[3] 刘胜军. 论商事外观主义[J]. 河北法学, 2016, 34(8): 86-89.
[4] Fasut, V. (2021) Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch Allgemeiner Teil. Verlag Nomos Baden-Baden, 245-271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 陈丹青. 权利外观与诈骗罪认定[J]. 法学家, 2020(2): 57-72.
[6] [德]卡尔•拉伦茨. 德国民法通论(下册) [M]. 王晓晔, 等, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 886.
[7] 陈兴良. 合同诈骗罪的特殊类型之“两头骗”: 定性与处理[J]. 政治与法律, 2016(4): 39-51.
[8] 杨志琼. 权利外观责任与诈骗犯罪——对二维码案、租车骗保案、冒领存款案的刑民解读[J]. 政法论坛, 2017, 35(6): 32-45.
[9] 张天一. 对财产犯罪中“财产概念”之再建构(下)——以“支配关系”所形成之财产概念[J]. 月旦法学杂志, 2009(165): 202-217.
[10] [日]松宫孝明. 刑法各论讲义[M]. 第4版. 王昭武, 张小宁, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2018: 203.
[11] 游成婧. 表见代理与诈骗罪的民刑并行分析[J]. 法学杂志, 2019, 40(5): 132-140.
[12] 杨兴培. 龚某盗卖其父房产一案之我见——兼谈不动产可以成为盗窃罪之对象[J]. 政治与法律, 2012(3): 127-133.
[13] 金成. 我国合同法上无权处分制度研究[J]. 当代法学, 2002(6): 125-129.
[14] 王利明. 论无权处分[J]. 中国法学, 2001(1): 77-90.