黑果枸杞(Lycium ruthenicum)和沙蒿(Artemisia desertorum)种子出苗和幼苗生长对沙埋的响应
Response of Sand Buried Depth on Seed Emergence and Seedling Growth of Lycium ruthenicum and Artemisia desertorum
DOI: 10.12677/IJE.2022.113045, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 胡小柯, 尉秋实, 王方琳*, 李 亚, 胡 静:甘肃省治沙研究所,甘肃省荒漠化与风沙灾害防治重点实验室,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 种子出苗幼苗生长沙埋厚度荒漠植物Seed Emergence Seedling Growth Sand Buried Depth Desert Plant Species
摘要: 通过室内试验测定了黑果枸杞(Lycium ruthenicum)和沙蒿(Artemisia desertorum)两种荒漠植物的种子生理特征以及沙埋厚度(0、1、2、3、4、5 cm)对其种子出苗及幼苗生长的影响。结果表明:两种植物均为荒漠灌木,黑果枸杞种子千粒重大于沙蒿,自然状态下沙蒿种子萌发率较大。随着沙埋厚度增加,两种植物种子出苗率下降、首次出苗时间延迟;幼苗生长方面,黑果枸杞和沙蒿分别适宜于1~2 cm、0~1 cm的浅层沙埋,均在沙埋厚度5 cm时种子几乎不萌发。在荒漠区采用这两种植物进行植被恢复时,除考虑种子自身性状外,还应充分考虑当地的沙埋、降雨等条件,以提高出苗率、增大幼苗定植率。
Abstract: The seed physiological characteristics and the effects of sand burial depth on seedling emergence and seedling growth (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 cm) of the two desert plants (Lycium ruthenicum, Artemisia desertorum) were determined by laboratory experiments. The results showed that both plants were desert shrubs, and the seed weight of Lycium ruthenicum was higher than that of Artemisia desertorum, and the seed germination rate of Artemisia desertorum was higher in natural state. With the increase of sand burial depth, the seed emergence rate was decreased and the first seed-ling emergence time was delayed of two plants. In terms of seedling growth, the L. ruthenicum and A. desertorum were suitable for shallow sand burial of 1~2 cm and 0~1 cm respectively, the seeds hardly germinated when were buried at 5 cm depth; In order to increase the emergence rate and the seedling planting rate, the seed characteristics will be considered and the local conditions such as sand burial and rainfall also should be taken into full consideration for vegetation restoration in desert areas.
文章引用:胡小柯, 尉秋实, 王方琳, 李亚, 胡静. 黑果枸杞(Lycium ruthenicum)和沙蒿(Artemisia desertorum)种子出苗和幼苗生长对沙埋的响应[J]. 世界生态学, 2022, 11(3): 381-387. https://doi.org/10.12677/IJE.2022.113045

参考文献

[1] Samsone, I., Druva-Lfisite, I., Andersone, U., et al. (2009) Plasticity of a Dune Plant Alyssum gmelinii in Response to Sand Burial in Natural Conditions. Acta Universitatis Latviensis, 753, 125-136.
[2] 唐卫东, 魏林源, 马全林, 等. 不同因素对沙蓬种子萌发和出苗的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2017, 32(3): 156-161.
[3] 张鹏, 何梦雅, 张宇, 等. 温度与浸种处理对沙棘种子萌发的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(6): 130-133.
[4] 王文娟, 贺达汉, 唐小琴, 等. 不同温度和沙埋厚度对砂生槐种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2011, 31(6): 1437-1442.
[5] 张景光, 王新平, 李新荣, 等. 荒漠植物生活史对策研究进展与展望[J]. 中国沙漠, 2005, 25(3): 306-314.
[6] Gilbert, M., Pammenter, N. and Ripley, B. (2008) The Growth Responses of Coastal Dune Species Are Determined by Nutrient Limitation and Sand Burial. Oecologia, 156, 169-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Liu, H.J. and Guo, K. (2005) The Impacts of Sand Burial on Seedling Development of Caragana intermedia. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25, 2550-2555.
[8] 黄振英, Gutterman Y, 胡正海, 等. 白沙蒿种子萌发特性的研究II环境因素的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25(2): 240-246.
[9] 杨慧玲, 曹志平, 董鸣, 等. 沙埋对无芒雀麦种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(11): 2438-2443.
[10] 安桂香, 曾凡江, 刘波, 等. 胡杨种子出苗对沙埋和供水条件的响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2011, 20(2): 436-441.
[11] 李秋艳, 方海燕. 沙埋对红砂幼苗出土和生长的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2008, 8(1): 30-33.
[12] 杨慧玲, 梁振雷, 朱选伟, 等. 沙埋和种子大小对柠条锦鸡儿种子萌发、出苗和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(24): 7757-7763.
[13] 曲浩, 赵哈林, 周瑞莲, 等. 沙埋对两种一年生藜科植物存活及光合生理的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(1): 79-85.
[14] 李秋艳, 赵文智. 五种荒漠植物幼苗出土及生长对沙埋厚度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(6): 1802-1808.
[15] 贺宇, 丁国栋, 汪晓峰, 等. 水分和沙埋对两种荒漠植物种子萌发和出苗的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(6): 1711-1716.
[16] 王桔红, 陈文. 黑果枸杞种子萌发及幼苗生长对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(4): 804-810.
[17] 王方琳, 柴成武, 魏小红, 等. 荒漠区药用植物黑果枸杞的组织培养[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(10): 104-109.
[18] 李玲. 植物生理学模块实验指导[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
[19] 苏延桂, 李新荣, 贾荣亮, 等. 沙埋对六种荒漠植物种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(6): 968-971.
[20] 赵哈林, 曲浩, 周瑞莲. 沙埋对两种荒漠植物幼苗生长的影响及其生理响应差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(9): 830-838.
[21] Hammond, D.S. and Brown, V.K. (1995) Seed Mass of Woody Plants in Relation to Disturbance, Dispersal, Soil Type in Wet Neotropical Forests. Ecology, 76, 2544-2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 柴成武, 张德魁, 王方琳, 等. 4种荒漠植物种子出苗和幼苗生长对沙埋深度的响应[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020, 35(2): 108-113.
[23] Koller, D. (1956) Germination Regulating Mechanisms in Some Desert Seeds III. Calligonum Comosum L’Her. Ecology, 37, 430-433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef